The United States of America is at the brink of total collapse. Once a great and
powerful nation, the United States is now in a free fall to disaster from which she
will never recover. A few more steps in its decline and it will be ruined. These are
not easy words for a patriotic American to read, but, nevertheless, they are
absolutely true. Tragically, it need not have come to this.
As one looks at the history of nations, from Babylon to Rome to America, it is
evident that a Divine hand was protecting and guiding America. This country
began as a few colonies on the Eastern seaboard of this vast land and became a
great nation.
Alexis de Tocqueville, a young French philosopher of the last century, came to
our shores to discover what magical quality enabled a handful of people to defeat
the mighty British Empire twice in 35 years. He looked for the greatness of
America in her fertile soil, her limitless forests and natural resources. He
examined America's schools, her Congress and her unique Constitution without
fully understanding the source of America's strength.
I was not, he said later, until he went to the churches of America and found
congregations 'aflame with righteousness' that he began to comprehend the
secret of this power. Upon his return to France, de Tocqueville wrote; "America is
great because America is good, and if America ever ceases to be good, America
will cease to be great." -- Des Griffin, Descent into Slavery?, Emissary
Publications, p. 267.
In her youth, the United States was very good. On her money, her trust in God
was proclaimed, and the great blessing of God rested upon this nation. As the
United States grew to greatness, she gradually abandoned the principles that
made her great until today she is approaching a very tragic end. The process of
the decline of America is similar to the decline and fall of the Roman Empire. Let
us examine a little of the history of ancient Rome and notice the parallels.
As the early Roman Empire was beginning to develop, it was building on the
solid premise that the family unit was the cornerstone of society. Morality and
discipline were the cornerstones of the family unit. As the empire developed,
liberalism crept in, and the morality and discipline that protected society began to
disappear. By the beginning of the 2nd century AD, most families had given into
the liberal trends, and their children were allowed to do pretty much as they
pleased.
Having given up the habit of controlling their children, they let their children
govern them, and took pleasure in bleeding themselves white to gratify the
expensive whims of their offspring. The result was that they were succeeded by a
generation of idlers and wastrels, who had grown accustomed to luxury and lost
all sense of discipline. --Jerome Carcopino, Daily Life in Ancient Rome, Yale
University Press, pp. 78, 79.
While this was going on, Rome witnessed "an epidemic of divorces." (ibid. p.97)
From the same author, we find that a strong women's rights movement
developed in Roman society.
Some [wives] evaded the duties of maternity for fear of losing their good looks,
some took pride in being behind their husbands in no sphere of activity, and vied
with them in tests of strength which their sex would seem to forbid: some were
not content to live their lives by their husband's side, but carried on another life
without him.... It is obvious that unhappy marriages must have been
innumerable.--ibid. pp. 90, 93, 95.
Roman schools were in disarray.
They undermined Instead of strengthened the children's morals, they mishandled
the children's bodies instead of developing them, and if they succeeded in
furnishing their minds with a certain amount of information, they were not
calculated to perform any loftier or nobler task.
The pupils left school with the heavy luggage of a few practical and
commonplace notions laboriously acquired and of so little value that in the fourth
century Vegetius [A Roman writer who wrote about the Roman military system.]
could not take for granted that new recruits for the army would be literate enough
to keep the books for the corps.--ibid. pp. 106,107.
This kind of education led to a continual decline in morality and discipline and
also resulted in decreasing patriotism.
The Roman virtues -- honesty, candor, frugality and patriotism -- withered and
died. What was left was a people whom neither the vices of the rulers nor the
increasingly bold attacks of foreign enemies could shake out of their apathy....In
all the great cities of the provinces, the theater held the same place of bad
preeminence in the social life of the inhabitants.
The Roman stage was gross and immoral. It was one of the main agencies to
which must be attributed the undermining of the originally sound moral life of
Roman society. So absorbed did the people become in the indecent
representations on the stage, that they lost all thought and care for the affairs of
real life. --Philip Myers, Rome; Its Rise and Fall, Ginn & Company, pp. 515,516.
Another leading factor in the demise of Rome was that is became a welfare
country. People were encouraged to be idle and receive money from the
government rather than work to make their own way. The welfare system was a
leading fact of Roman life. The evils that resulted from this misdirected state
charity can hardly be overstated. Idleness and all its accompanying vices were
fostered to such a degree that we shall probably not be wrong in enumerating the
practice as one of the chief causes of the demoralization of society. --ibid. p.523.
It is obvious that the moral fabric of America today is where the morality of the
Roman Empire was nearly 2,000 years ago. Do we not see the breakdown of the
home, a strong women's rights movement, a deterioration in the school system,
moral decay as espoused by the news and entertainment media and the schools,
and welfare eating the heart out of the American economy? With regard to these
problems, how are we any different from the Roman Empire during its decay?
Why are these things happening in America? But, that's the wrong question. The
question should be: Who has brought America to the brink of destruction?
As mentioned earlier, Providence had its eye on the United States. America was
the land of opportunity. It was the place where those who were being persecuted
for their faith could come and worship God according to the dictates of their own
conscience. It was a land without a king where one could come and breathe the
air of civil liberty. It was the place where one could come and earn a good living
for himself and his family. America was the place where dreams came true. There
once was a Divine Hand Over America.
In 1759, twenty-five years, more or less, stood between the thirteen colonies and
freedom from the British. Twenty-five years and the greatest Protestant nation to
ever exist in the history of nations would fly its flag. Twenty-five years and the
groundwork for the Constitution -- republicanism, inalienable rights, and a
government of the people, by the people, and for the people -- was in sight. An
experiment in government never before tried in history was to become the
greatest nation the world had ever seen.
Many said such a government would not work. The Roman Catholic Church had
ruled the world under her dictatorial control. She was, and still is, deathly afraid of
such an experiment. For over 200 year, the Protestant Reformation had
challenged the papacy's authority. The papacy gradually began losing her power.
An experiment like America was certainly not in the plans of the Catholic Church;
no nation would be allowed to espoused principles that would bring the papacy
down.
What of the monarchs of Europe? They ruled by permission of the papacy and
had wielded tyrannical control for ages with no one to oppose them. Were they
now ready to watch the development of a government of the people, by the
people, and for the people? A clearer rationale would be that they would unite
with Rome to stop this American experiment with every weapon at their
fingertips.
By the 1550s the Reformation had become so extensive in Europe that the
papacy began to realize that they must do something to try to stop it. They
realized that if it were not stopped, it would eventually undermine the position of
the Catholic Church and destroy the absolute political power they had achieved.
In order to accomplish the destruction of the Reformation, a new secret
organization was formed within the Vatican called the Jesuits.
One of the major purposes of the Jesuits was to destroy every trace of
Protestantism and its principles, including religious freedom, republicanism,
representative government, and an economy built around a strong middle class.
Another purpose of the Jesuits was to greatly expand the power and control of
the papacy throughout the entire world.
I cannot too much impress upon the minds of my readers that the Jesuits, by
their very calling, by the very essence of the institution, are bound to seek, by
every means, right or wrong, the destruction of Protestantism. This is the
condition of their existence, the duty they must fulfill, or cease to be Jesuits.
Accordingly, we find them in this evil dilemma. Either the Jesuits fulfill the duties
of their calling, or not. In the first instance, they must be considered as the
bitterest enemies of the Protestant faith; in the second, as bad and unworthy
priests; and in both cases, therefore, to be equally regarded with aversion and
distrust. -- G.B. Nicolini, History of the Jesuits: Their Origin, Progress, Doctrine,
and Design, Henry G. Bohn, preface, [emphasis added}.
The first triumphs of the Reformation past, Rome summoned new forces, hoping
to accomplish its destruction. At this time the order of the Jesuits was created;
the most cruel, unscrupulous, and powerful of all the champions of
popery....There
was no crime to great for them to commit, no deception too
basilar
them to practice, no disguise to difficult for them to
assume. Vowed to
perpetual poverty and humility, it was their studied aim to secure wealth and
power, to be devoted to the overthrow of Protestantism, and the re-establishment
of the papal supremacy. – E.G. White, The Great Controversy, Review and
Herald, p. 234, [emphasis added].
From their very beginning in the 1540s, the Jesuits did just that. They used any
means they could devise to destroy Protestantism, including assassination to kill
leaders who tried to bring freedom to their people. Two examples are William of
Orange in 1584 and Henry IV in 1610. Both were slain by Jesuit assassins.
The Jesuits used deception in the extreme to bring about the St. Bartholomew’s
Day Massacre in 1572, where 70,000 Protestant Huguenots, including women
and children, were slain in one night. They also created the 30 Years War from
1618-1648 in order to destroy the Lutherans of Europe. The blood that reddened
European soil for centuries can all be traced back to the murderous Jesuits.
Starting in the 1600s, the Jesuits created a communist regime in Paraguay that
eventually brought the Jesuits demise in the 1700s.
The Jesuits, as is well known, held very large regions of Paraguay under
missionary control from 1650 to 1750. More than a quarter million natives worked
under their direction, and no payment was made directly to them.... They were
educated, trained, housed, clothed, fed and, to some extent, amused, but what
became of the surplus profits of their labors, and of the extensive trading that
was carried on? Over two thousand boats are said to have been engaged in
carrying merchandise and goods on the Parana River; and the economic value of
the Reductions was beyond doubt very great: so great in deed as to have
awakened the envy of Spanish and Portuguese traders. Robertson
[contemporary historian] estimated that the reductions represented at least
$25,000,000 capital for the Society. – Boyd Barrett, The Jesuit Enigma, New
York: Boni & Liveright, p. 211.
The Reductions were communist communes set up as manufacturing facilities
using the Guarani Indians as slave laborers. The products they produced were
sold in Europe and greatly enriched the Jesuit order.
The Reductions produced herbs, hides, tallow, clocks, and other goods, which
the Jesuits traded in Europe with their huge fleet of ships. The profits were used
to finance wars against the Protestant nations they had sworn to destroy. But all
this
wealth and power was acquired in secret, as the kings of Portugal and
Spain
knew nothing about the Reductions. – Eric Phelps, Vatican
Assassins, Halycon
Unified Services, p. 189.
By the middle of the 1700s, the Jesuit Order had become the powerhouse of
Europe. According to Barret, the Jesuit Order at last reached the pinnacle of its
power and prestige in the early eighteenth century. It had become more
influential and wealthier than any other organization in the world. It held a
position in world affairs that no oath-bound group of man has ever held before of
since... nearly all the Kings and Sovereigns of Europe had only Jesuits as
directors of their consciences, so that the whole of Europe appeared to be
governed by Jesuits only. – Boyd Barrett, The Jesuit Enigma, New York: Boni &
Liveright, p. 209.
The Jesuits ruled the world. The monarchs of Europe, and the pope himself had
Jesuits as their confessors. The plans and plots were all alike known to them.
Besides this, they were amassing a vast amount of wealth that allowed the
Jesuits to do whatever they chose. With them controlling the world, how could
the little colonies of America have had a chance to stand against the Jesuit
controlled monarchs of Europe? In an instant, the Jesuits could utilize any army
at its disposal and crush the colonies. It was at this juncture in 1759 that something
strangely divine began to happen. It began in Portugal. The Portuguese
king, Joseph I, banished the Jesuits from his realm.
In Portugal the culmination point was reached by an attempt to assassinate the
king....the deed had been incited by the Jesuits, who had impressed ignorant and
fanatical minds with the idea that no wrong was committed by killing a heretical
king; that is one who did not submit to their dictation....Hence, as a measure
absolutely essential to the life of the nation, the king issued a decree of
banishment against the Jesuits as traitors, rebels, enemies to, and aggressors
on, his person, his States, and the public peace and the general good of the
people. The Jesuits were then seized, transported to the States of the Church
(Italy).... – Richard Thompson, The Footprints of the Jesuits, Hunt & Eaton, p.
217, 218, [emphasis supplied].
King Joseph’s Portugal was the first Catholic kingdom of Europe to banish the
Jesuits from their realm. With this first banishment, the dominoes began to fall
rather quickly. Catholic France banished them in 1762. The decree of Louis XV
and the French Parliament reads as follows:
Whereupon, the investigation into the constitution and statutes of the society [of
Jesuits] ...resulted in the enactment of a Parliamentary decree which shows the
odium then attached to the society in France. It denounced their doctrines and
practices ‘as perverse, destructive of every principle of religion, and even of
probity; as injurious to morality, pernicious to civil society, seditious, dangerous to
rights of the persons of the sovereigns; as fit to excite the greatest troubles in
States, to form and maintain the most profound corruption in the hearts of
men...that the institutions of the Jesuits should forever cease to exist throughout
the whole extent of the kingdom.’—ibid. p. 219
The third sovereign to drive the Jesuits from their realm was King Charles III of
Spain. He banished the Jesuits in His [Charles III] greatest work, the expulsion of
the Jesuits, would never have been carried out if he had not been persuaded of
its political necessity. The [Jesuit] order had already been driven out by Pombal
from Portugal and by Choiseul from France when Charles III was convinced that
a riot in Madrid...had been promoted by the Jesuits. – Encyclopedia Britannica,
The Werner company, vol. XVII, p. 341.
One year later, yet another nation banished this evil brood from their realm.
Under the leadership of Fra Manuel Pinto de Fonseca, the Jesuits were forced to
leave the island of Malta in 1768. Of this, we read:
In 1768 the Jesuits, having given much trouble, were expelled and their property
confiscated. – ibid, vol. XV, p. 343.
The mightiest Catholic nations of Europe had banished the Jesuits from their
realms. These Catholic monarchs demanded that the Catholic Church abolish
the society forever. Clement XIII, the pope at that time, resisted the pressure of
the European monarchs, but finally capitulated. The night before he planned to
abolish the Jesuits, he was poisoned to death.
During the night preceding the day appointed for the public ceremony of
announcing the abolition of the Jesuits, Clement XIII was suddenly seized with
convulsions and died, leaving the act unperformed, and the Jesuits victorious.
Cormenin...records this event in the terse and expressive words: ‘The Jesuits
had poisoned him.’
The Catholic Monarchies of Europe, however, insisted that the Jesuits be
disbanded and threatened the Pope. Clement
XIII, after endless indecision,
postponements, and unconvincing delays,
finally decided to do what he had been
advised he should do. He
capitulated.
He made ready a proclamation announcing the suppression of the Jesuit order. It
was said that the document was written and was waiting for the day when it was
to be made public. To the surprise of all, however, the Pope was suddenly
attacked by a mysterious illness. He died on the 12th February (a coincidence in
dates) 1769 with agonizing, unexplained convulsions.
Rumors had it that he had been poisoned. The suddenness of his affliction and
the convulsions both pointed to it. The suspicions, however, were never proved.
It was suggested by those in the know that the Pope had been made to die
before he could publish the announcement of the official suppression of the
Jesuit order. – Avro Manhattan, Murder in the Vatican, Ozark Books, p. 74.
Four years later in 1773, three years before the Declaration of Independence,
mark it well, Pope Clement XIV wrote an order, the purpose of which was to
abolish the Jesuits forever. (Unfortunately, a later pope reestablished them in
1814.) Of this, we read:
Again, in July 1773, Pope Clement XIV wrote an order dissolving the Society of
Jesus. This bull, Dominus ac Redemptor, was published 16th of August of that
year. After issuing it, however, the Pope relented, in fear of the consequences,
and tried to withdraw it. Too late. The Spanish ambassador had already
dispatched the document by special courier direct to Madrid.
The papal brief annihilated the Jesuit order throughout the world, closed its
schools and canceled its statues. Its houses were occupied and its general and
other dignitaries were imprisoned. – ibid., pp. 74.75.
In a 14-year period, from 1759-1773, the Catholic monarchs of Europe and the
pope, himself, were preoccupied with abolishing the Jesuits. Emmett
McLaughlin’s tremendous book, An Inquiry into the Assassination of Abraham
Lincoln, summarizes these events very succinctly with these words.
Even their own Catholic countries finally became surfeited with Jesuit political
intrigue and financial avarice and, in self-preservation, were forced to expel them,
Portugal, Angola, Goa, and Brazil took the lead in 1759. France followed in 1754.
Several Italian states such as Parma, Sicily and Naples followed suit. By sealed
imperial
orders sent to her colonies around the world, Spain threw out all
Jesuits
in 1767, This decree suppressed them in the Philippines,
Argentina, New
Granada (Columbia), Peru, Chile, Ecuador, Guatemala, Cuba, Puerto Rico,
Mexico, New Mexico and Arizona. Austria did the same in 1773.
Finally, Pope Clement XIV in 1773 issued the document, Dominus ac Redemptor,
abolishing the Jesuit Order altogether, listing eleven popes that tried to curb their
excesses. Among them were Benedict XIV, Innocent XI, Innocent XIII and
Clement XIII.
He cited the Jesuits for opposition to “other religious orders,” for “revolts and
intestine troubles in some of the Catholic states,” and “persecutions against the
church in Europe and Asia. There remained no other remedy to so great
evils...and this step was necessary in order to prevent the Christians from rising
one against the other and from massacring each other in the very bosom of our
common mother, the holy church.” Therefore, he wrote, “after a mature
deliberation, we do out of our certain knowledge and the fullness of our apostolic
power, suppress and abolish the said company.” – Emmett McLaughlin, An
Inquiry into the Assassination of Abraham Lincoln, Lyle Stuart, Inc., pp. 84, 85.
The timing of these events in Europe in fascinating. Catholic Europe was in
disarray. The Catholic monarchs were pre-occupied with taking care of the
problems with the Jesuit Order. The Jesuits were reeling as one Catholic country
after another drove them from their realms. While Europe was shaking, thirteen
colonies across the Atlantic were looking at the very real possibility of war with
England. The thirteen colonies were instituting principles of government never
before heard in the annals of human history. Documents would soon be written
that would codify such things as inalienable rights, government of the people, by
the people, and for the people, free exercise of religion, and the right to keep and
bear arms. These documents would soon be the hope of mankind throughout the
would longing to be free.
What if the Catholic monarchs were no distracted by their dealings with Jesuits?
What if the Jesuits were not reeling by their banishment from Europe? The
monarchs and the Jesuits would have utilized their wealth and military power to
smash the American colonies in the New World, and the Protestant dream in
America would have never been a reality. Without a doubt, there was a Divine
Hand Over America!
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Chapter 2: The Illuminati-Jewish Front______________________________________________________________________________________
There are many books and treatises on the conspiracy theory of the history. It is
very difficult to find any two of them that agree. Some say the perpetrators
behind the scenes are the Illuminati, and others say the Jews. The list of the
conspiratorial organizations blamed includes the Communists, the Bilderbergers,
the Trilateral Commission, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Committee of
300, the Mafia, the Round Table, the Club of Rome, the Free Masons, the CIA FBI-
Mossad, and other secret societies. Of course the New World Order, and
European Union, and the International Bankers must be included in this list also.
Because of all the organizations accused of conspiracy, most people tend to
disbelieve the conspiracy theory of history. If they do believe it, they tend to be
thoroughly confused as to which organization is responsible.
The “head” conspirators are behind each one of the organizations mentioned,
and they control all of them, and more. Let us investigate this and look at the
evidence that shows that statement to be correct. Of course the real conspirators
do not want you to realize who they are. They do not want you to realize that they
are the real power behind all of these conspiratorial organizations.
Dr. Koryagina is the economic adviser to Russian president, Vladimir Putin. In a
radio interview with Rick Wiles of American Freedom News, Dr. Koryagina
declared:
Everybody knows about organized crime and the Mafia. Also people have known
for a long time about secret societies and so forth. During my research, I started
to notice that those structures can be put together and joined. And I realized that
right now, we have a criminal monster, a hybrid of organized crime, Mafia and
secret societies that have merged together. (Aired Dec. 6, 2001)
All of these groups, according to this Russian economist and adviser, have
merged together. All of these groups have one visible human head. The
Illuminati, the Jews, and all the rest of them take their marching orders from the
same mastermind, the same human leader. While some say, and very
convincingly, that the Illuminati and/or the Jews are calling the shots, this chapter
will show conclusively who the human leader of all these groups really is.
As we saw in chapter 1, the Catholic monarchs and the pope, himself, were
trying to ban the Jesuit Order throughout the entire world in 1773. In order to
survive, the Jesuits were forced to either go underground or travel to three countries
where they were still permitted to operate: England, Prussia (Germany), and Russia.
It is an unshakable fact that the founder of the modern Bavarian Illuminati was a
trained Jesuit named Adam Weishaupt from Ingolstadt University, which was the
center of the Jesuit counter-reformation. (See Encyclopedia Britannica, Volume
12, page 251.)
Ingolstadt was the center where the Jesuits were flourishing in 1556. (See
History of Protestantism by Wylie, Volume 2, p. 413.)
Can we really believe that Weishaupt would have been allowed to continue his
professorship in a Jesuit controlled University if he had deserted them? No way!
All evidence suggests that he continued to work for the Jesuits, establishing the
order of the Illuminati for them. – Sydney Hunter, Is Alberto for Real, Chick
Publications, pp. 21,22.
The Apostle of Lucifer, Adam Weishaupt was born a Jew, converted to
Catholicism, then turned to Witchcraft, there he became an expert, and founded
another sect of the Illuminati. This sect of Illuminati was founded May 1st, 1776.
– William Josiah Sutton, The New Age Movement and The Illuminati 66, The
Institute of Religious Knowledge, p. 173.
On May 1, 1776, the Order of the Illuminati was officially founded in the old Jesuit
stronghold of Bavaria from which the Sons of Loyola had ignited the Thirty Years’
War. – Eric Phelps, Vatican Assassins, Halycon Unified Services, page 214.
From the Jesuit College at Ingolstadt is said to have issued the sect known as
‘the Illuminati of Bavaria’ founded by Adam Weishaupt; its nominal founder,
however, seems to have played a subordinate though conspicuous role in the
organization of this sect. – Lady Queensborough, Occult Theocracy, Emissary
Publication, p.313.
The organization...is a secret society founded in Babaria in 1776. Its founder,
Adam Weishaupt, a professor of canon law at the University of Ingolstadt,
labeled it the Illuminati Order. – Dee Zahner, The Secret Side of History, LTAA
Communications Publishers, p. 26.
Canon law was the result of the infamous Council of Trent, which met from 1545-
1563. This law revealed the Catholic Church’s stand against the Protestant
Reformation and is known as the Catholic Counter-Reformation. This council not
only revealed the church’s hostility toward the Reformation, but also how she
would attack and destroy it.
Weishaupt established the Illuminati specifically to be a front organization behind
which the Jesuits could hide. After being abolished by Clement XIV in 1773, the
Jesuits used the Illuminati and other organizations to carry out their operations.
Thus the front organizations would be blamed for the trouble caused by the
Jesuits. Having so many front organizations would also confuse the people so
that it would be virtually impossible to know who is actually manipulating the
wars, policies, politics, and trouble caused by the Jesuits. The methods of many
of these front organizations such as the Illuminati are carbon copies of the
Jesuits methods and techniques.
This passage exactly describes the methods laid down by Weishaupt for his
‘Insinuating Brothers’—the necessity of proceeding with caution in the enlisting of
adepts, of not revealing to the novice doctrines that might be likely to revolt him,
of ‘speaking sometimes in one way, sometimes in another, so that one’s real
purpose should remain impenetrable’ to members of the inferior grades.
How did these oriental methods penetrate to the Bavarian professor? According
to certain writers, through the Jesuits. The fact that Weishaupt had been brought
up by this Order has provided the enemies of the Jesuits with the argument that
they were the secret inspirers of the Illuminati.... That Weishaupt did, however,
draw to a certain extent on Jesuit methods of training is recognized even by
Barruel, himself a Jesuit, who, quoting Mirabeau, says that Weishaupt ‘admired
above all those laws, that regime of the Jesuits, which, under one head, made
men dispersed over the universe land towards the same goal....—Nesta Webster,
Secret Societies and Subversive Movements, Emissary Publications, p. 197,
198.
Here is what we have learned so far about Adam Weishaupt and the Illuminati.
1. Modern Illuminism founded May 1, 1776.
2. Originated in Bavaria, Germany, a Jesuit stronghold.
3. Illuminati organization is a carbon copy of the Jesuit order.
4. Weishaupt was brought up and trained by Jesuits.
5. He taught Catholic canon law at a Jesuit College, Ingolstadt University.
During the Order’s suppression from 1773 to 1824 by Pope Clement XIV,
General Ricci [the head of the Jesuits] created the Illuminati with his soldier,
Adam Weishaupt, the Father of modern Communism, who, with his Jacobins,
conducted the French Revolution.... For the Sons of Loyola punished all their
enemies including the Dominican priests, perfected the inner workings between
themselves and Freemasonry, created an alliance between the House of Rothschild
in establishing the Illuminati.... The Jesuit General was in control of
Scottish Rite Freemasonry an now sought an alliance with the Masonic Baron of
the House of Rothschild. To accomplish this he chose a Jesuit who was a
German Gentile (not a Jew) by race and Freemason by association-Adam
Weishaupt.... Weishaupt established the Illuminati in 1776 and joined the Grand
Orient Masonic Lodge in 1777. He united the magnificent financial empire of the
Masonic Jewish House of Rothschild with the opulence of the international and
secret, anti-Jewish Race, Gentile Society of Jesus. –Eric Phelps, Vatican
Assassins, Halcyon United Services, pp. 206, 205, 213, 215.
The House of Rothschild financed Weishaupt In his creation of the Illuminati.
Phelps alluded to this several times in the preceding paragraph. He is not alone
in his assertion that the Jewish House of Rothschild worked hand in hand with
the Jesuits in creating and funding the Illuminati.
After he [Weishaupt] formed his organization with financial backing from the
House of Rothschild, he adopted the name Illuminati.... It was on May 1, 1776
that Adam Weishaupt backed and led by the House of Rothschild, formed the
International Revolutionary force called the Illuminati, which later became known
as Communism. – William Sutton, The New Age Movement and The Illuminati
666, Institute of Religious Knowledge, p. 175, 231.
Aware that the Rothschilds are an important Jewish family. I looked them up in
Encyclopedia Judaica and discovered that they bear the title “Guardians of the
Vatican Treasury....” The appointment of Rothschild gave the black papacy
absolute financial privacy and secrecy. Who would ever search a family of
orthodox Jews for the key to the wealth of the Roman Catholic Church? -- F.
Tupper Saussy, Rulers of Evil, Harper Collins Publishers,, pp. 160, 161.
With the financial power of the Rothschilds behind Weishaupt’s Illuminati, the
Jesuit and the Catholic Church have an almost perfect cover to hide their
operations from the view of the public. When investigators try to trace the roots of
certain events, the Illuminati is a perfect shield behind which the Jesuits can hide,
and behind which investigators cannot penetrate. The implications of this are
enormous. We will briefly consider two items here but will examine them in
greater detail in following chapters.
The book, Descent into Slavery, shows that there was a plan for both world wars
and even a third world war.
This plan was outlined in graphic detail by Albert Pike, the sovereign Grand
Commander of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry and the
top Illuminist in America, in a letter to Giusseppe Mazzini dated August 15, 1871.
[Knowing
what we know about the Illuminati, Albert Pike was speaking as one who
understood the Jesuits plan for world dominion to bring everything back
into
the pope’s hands. Pike was the top Illuminist/Jesuit in America.] Pike stated that
the First World War was to be fomented in order to destroy Czarist Russia and
to place that vast land under the direct control of Illuminati agents. Russia was
then to be used as a ‘bogey man’ to further the aims of the Illuminati worldwide.
[In other words, the Jesuits gained control of Russia near the end of WWI.]
World War II was to be fomented through manipulation of the differences that
existed between the German Nationalists and the Political Zionists. This was to
result in an expansion of Russian influence and the establishment of a state of
Israel in Palestine. [In both instances, Pike’s plan for world wars has been
precisely carried out. These plans existed 40 to 60 years before the wars took
place.]
The Third World War was planned to result from the differences stirred up by
Illuminati agents between the Zionists and the Arabs. The conflict was planned to
spread worldwide. -- Des Griffin, Descent into Slavery, Emissary Publications,
pp.38, 39.
Pike shows in that quote that the Jesuits are planning for a third world war
between the Zionists and the Arabs. Zionists are those who are pro Israel like the
United States and Great Britain. The so-called war on terror is part of the
preparation for that war using Arabs such as Al Qaeda, Saddam Hussein of Iraq,
and others against the Zionists of America and Great Britain. The Jesuits are
stirring up this conflict by their lies and deception, such as the false claim that
Saddam Hussein was stock-piling weapons of mass destruction. This lie was
simply a ploy to convince the American people that we had no choice but to
invade Iraq. As will be shown later, George Bush is working closely with the
Jesuits to carry out their policies to the letter. The current conflict was planned
over 130 years ago.
The Illuminati/Jesuit connection also impacts us in another way. In Fritz
Springmeier’s book, Bloodlines of the Illuminati, we read that the two Bush
Presidents were members of the Skull and Bones Order at Yale. The Skull and
Bones Order is an entry point into the Illuminati. It is made to appear as just
another exclusive fraternity, but in actuality a member of the Skull and Bones
order is also a member of the Illuminati. We have seen that this means that the
two Bush presidents are also member of the Jesuit Order and are carrying out
their wishes. Springmeier also points out that the Bush family has been tied up
with the Harriman family since the 1920s. The Harrimans have been intimately
connected with the Skull and Bones Order/Illuminati/Jesuits for decades. (See
Fritz Springmeier, Bloodlines of the Illuminati, Ambassador House, pages 63,
320)
It is a most sobering thought to realize that the Jesuit Order controls the
President of the United States. It is also a most sobering thought to think that this
great Protestant nation is under the control of a man who is willingly carrying out
the dictates of an Order whose stated objective is the destruction of every
Protestant principle for which this nation stands. If permitted, this President would
shred the Constitution. He is passing laws such as the USA Patriot Act and the
Homeland Security Act, which totally ignore the restrictions on such laws in the
Constitution.
This President has been told to engage in war in the Middle East. He has done
so knowing that many lives of America’s youth would be lost. This is nothing but a
deliberate act of Treason! When will Americans wake up and see what is being
done to them?
Let us now examine the claim that the Jews are really the bad people who are
behind the scenes manipulating the world. The propaganda in the media today
tries desperately to convict the Jews as the real instigators of the trouble in the
world. The Jewish belief that Christ will one day come and rule the world causes
the Vatican to shudder.
The Vatican believes that if hatred for the Jews can be fomented as took place in
Hitler’s Germany. Then Jews will be ruthlessly eliminated. The Vatican believes
that if all Jews are killed, Christ will not come, and the Vatican’s aim to rule the
world would remain intact. Avro Manhattan says it this way:
It is important, although it may be difficult for some to recognize the religious
nature of the Communist/Zionist/Catholic political configuration. Although
deliberately muted in public pronouncements, behind the Zionist banner there
was to be found the ancient Messianic hope for the coming a global theocracy,
as predicted by all the seers and prophets of Zion. It was to be a theocracy in
which Jehovah, not Christ, was to be King.
The spectre of the creation of such a theocracy has haunted the inner chambers
of the Catholic church from her earliest inception, and still is a dominant fear.
In Vatican eyes, therefore, the millenarian yearning for a global Hebrew
theocracy, represents a deadly threat to the eschatological teachings of the
Catholic church. When translated into concrete political terms, such a view spells
not only rivalry, but implacable enmity. -- Avro Manhattan, The Vatican Moscow
Washington Alliance, chick Publications, pp. 169, 170.
Why would the Jesuits use their implacable enemy, the Jews, to further their
designs for world dominion? The Jesuits never do anything out in the open where
they
can be exposed. If they are recognized as the culprits, they will be
blamed and
suffer the consequences, but if they can use someone else as
the cause of
the world’s problems, especially an enemy they can destroy in the process, then
they have simultaneously accomplished two of their objectives. The Jewish
people are the perfect scapegoat. Since the Rothschilds are Jesuit agents
operating under a Jewish cover, using them in forming the Illuminati back in 1776
effectively throws the onus of this conspiracy on the Jews. The Rothschilds are
certainly not the only Jesuit agents that operate under a Jewish front.
The following sources indicate that Adam Weishaupt and the Rothschilds were
the brains and the wealth behind the French revolution.
History books will tell us that the French Revolution first began in 1787 or 1789,
depending on which book you read. However, it was actually planned by Dr.
Adam Weishaupt and the House of Rothschild almost 20 years before the
Revolution took place. -- William Sutton, The New Age Movement and The
Illuminati 666, Institute of Religious Knowledge, pp. 172, 73.
For the main purpose of Baruel’s book is to show that not only had Illuminism
and Grand Orient Masonry contributed largely to the French Revolution, but that
three years after that first explosion they were still as active as ever. -- Nesta
Webster, Secret Societies and Subversive Movement, Emissary Publications, p
255.
The (the Jesuits) have son constantly mixed themselves up in court and state
intrigues that they must, in justice, be reproached with striving after world
dominion. They cost kings their lives, not on the scaffold, but by assassination,
and equally hurtful as the society of Illuminati; they were the foremost among the
crowd, at all event, who applauded the murder scenes in Paris.... -- Hector
Macpherson, The Jesuits in History, Ozark Book Publishers, pp. 126, 127.
The Jesuits, Weishaupt and the Rothschilds, managed to cast the blame for the
French Revolution on their front organization, the Illuminati!
The Communistic ideals that came from the Reductions in Paraguay and that
were exalted in France had their fruition in the writings of Karl Marx.
The ideas Lenin developed were directly from Karl Marx’s Communist Manifesto,
and ideas founded in the Communist Manifesto were directly from the writings of
Dr. Adam Weishaupt, who took his orders from the House of Rothschild. --
William Sutton, The New Age Movement and The Illuminati 666, Institute of
Religious Knowledge, p. 193.
Karl Marx was hired by a mysterious group who called themselves ‘The Leagure
of Just Men’ to write the Communist Manifesto as demagogic boob-bait to appeal
to the mob. In actual fact the Communist Manifesto was in circulation for many
years before Marx’ name was widely enough recognized to establish his
authorship for this revolutionary handbook. All Karl Marx did was update and
codify the very same revolutionary plans and principles set down seventy years
earlier by Adam Weishaupt, the founder of the Order of the Illuminati in Bavaria.
And, it is widely acknowledged by serious scholars of this subject that the
League of the Jest Men was simply an extension of the Illuminati... -- Gary Allan,
None Dare Call it Conspiracy, Concord Press, p. 25.
Karl Marx, ‘the Father of Modern Communism... was privately tutored by Jesuits
in the huge Reading Room of the British Museum while writing The Communist
Manifesto based upon the ten maxims of ‘planks’ the Order had perfected on its
Paraguayan Reductions.... A Jew was chosen for this task; for, the Order
anticipated blaming all the evils of the Communist Inquisition on the Jewish
Race. -- Eric Phelps, Vatican Assassins, Halcyon Unified Services, p. 293.
Adam Weishaupt and the Rothschild family created the Illuminati. Then both
Weishaupt and the Rothschilds united their efforts to foment the French
Revolution and the roots of Communism. The Jesuits next used Karl Marx to
write the Communist Manifesto, which codified the Illuminati’s plans. The
teachings of Marx were then passed to Lenin, Stalin, and Trotsky. The financiers
of all these men were the Rothschilds or Rothschild agents such as Paul
Warburg, the first chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank, Jacob Schiff and
Armand Hammer. Each one of these men, being Jesuits, were Jews and
operated under a Jewish front. Is it any wonder that the Jews are usually blamed
for all the conspiracies?
Other Jesuits who operate under a Jewish front include the chairman of the
Federal Reserve bank, Alan Greenspan, Arlen Specter, and Henry Kissinger.
The Jesuit Order has very effectively used traitorous Jews as their agents to
carry out awful crimes against humanity. So many things have been done by
Jews who were being used by the Jesuits. When the whistle is blown and
someone cries foul, the Jew is left holding the bag and is blamed, while the
Jesuit Order walks away clean. This has been the case time after time through
the last 400 years.
The Illuminati and traitorous Jews have been used by the Jesuits and have taken
the blame for many crimes that really were the Jesuits responsibility. We have
seen many such examples in this chapter. In the Jesuits relentless pursuit to
destroy America, she would use the Jewish House of Rothschild to gain control
of the American banking system. To this, we will turn in the next chapter.
Chapter 3: Blackmailing Banker Bandits______________________________________________________________________________________
Because Pope Clement XIV and the Catholic emperors across Europe were busy
abolishing the Jesuits, they were not able to cooperate with each other well
enough to stop the Protestant American experiment. If a Divine Hand had not
intervened to protect the 13 colonies, there would never have been a United
States with its God-given Constitution!
The Jesuits were greatly troubled because of their expulsions around the world,
and they were forced to go underground. We have seen that they used their
agent, Adam Weishaupt, to create the Illuminati and used the Jesuit House of
Rothschild to finance it. It was not just here, however, where Rothschild wealth
was very helpful. America was becoming a giant of financial affluence and
prosperity. Already, the Rothschild were involved in extensive trading in the
Americas. Besides their financial and mercantile empires, the Rothschilds were
utilizing their wealth to gain political and religious dominance in order to further
the ends of the Jesuits in destroying Protestantism worldwide.
Aware that the Rothschilds are an important Jewish family, I looked them up in
Encyclopedia Judaica and discovered that they bear the title 'Guardians of the
Vatican Treasury.'... The appointment of Rothschild gave the black papacy
absolute financial privacy and secrecy. Who would ever search a family of
orthodox Jews for the key to the wealth of the Roman Catholic Church? -- F.
Tupper Saussy, Rulers of Evil, Harper-Collins, pp. 160,161.
The Jesuits used all their resources in their attempt to destroy America. They
used the powerful financial empire of the Rothschilds to obtain control through
money. Biographer Frederick Morton concluded that through the effective use of
money
the Rothschilds had successfully conquered the world more thoroughly,
more
cunningly, and much more lastingly than all the Caesars before or
all the Hitlers after
them. -- Frederic Morton, The Rothschilds: A
Family Portrait, Atheneum, p. 14.
The Rothschilds believed that if they could control a nation's money, then they
could control that country. This is clearly pointed out in the following statement
from biographer Derek Wilson.
The banking community had always constituted a 'fifth estate' whose members
were able, by heir control of royal purse strings, to affect important events. But
the
house of Rothschild was immensely more powerful than any financial
empire
that had ever preceded it. It commanded vast wealth. It was
international. It was
independent. Royal governments were nervous of it because they could not
control it. Popular governments hated it because it was not answerable to the
people. -- Derek Wilson, Rothschild: The Wealth and Power of a Dynasty,
Charles Scribner's Sons, pp. 79, 98, 99.
Using the vast wealth of the Rothschilds, the Jesuits equipped armies to destroy
countries that would not do what they dictated. They could buy politicians and
through them change the very laws of a nation. This is exactly what they did in
America and are still doing today! The Jesuits have been using the Rothschild
wealth to control major events behind the scenes worldwide for the last few
centuries. This was true when they first started, but today they have the central
banks in each country including the Federal Reserve Bank to supply them with
funds. To illustrate how the Jesuits and the Rothschilds have used countries and
events to gain domination over nations and financial markets, we must look at
the battle of Waterloo between France and England on June 19, 1815.
There were vast fortunes to be made, and lost, on the outcome of the Battle of
Waterloo. The Stock Exchange in London was at fever pitch as traders awaited
news of the outcome of this battle of the giants. If Britain lost, English consuls
would plummet to unprecedented depths. If Britain was victorious, the value of
the consul would leap to new dizzying heights.
As the two huge armies closed in for the battle to the death, Nathan Rothschild
had his agents working feverishly on both sides of the line to gather the most
accurate possible information as the battle proceeded. Additional Rothschild
agents were on hand to carry the intelligence bulletins to a Rothschild command
post strategically located nearby.
Late on the afternoon of June 19, 1815, a Rothschild representative jumped on
board a specially chartered boat and headed out into the channel in a hurried
dash for the English coast. In his possession was a top secret report from
Rothschilds secret service agents on the progress of the crucial battle. This
intelligence data would prove indispensable to Nathan in making some vital
decisions.
The special agent was met a Folkstone the following morning at dawn by Nathan
Rothschild himself. After quickly scanning the highlights of the report Rothschild
was on his way again, speeding towards London and the Stock Exchange.
Arriving at the Exchange amid frantic speculation on the outcome of the battle,
Nathan took up his usual position beside the famous ‘Rothschild Pillar’. Without a
sign
of emotion, without the slightest change of facial expression the
stony-faced,
flint eyed chief of the House of Rothschild gave a
predetermined signal to his
agents who were stationed nearby.
Rothschild agents immediately began to dump consuls on the market. As
hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of consuls poured onto the market their
value started to slide. Then they began to plummet.
Nathan continued to lean against ‘his’ pillar, emotionless, expressionless. He
continued to sell, and sell and sell. Consuls kept on falling. Word began to sweep
through the Stock Exchange: ‘Rothschild knows.’ ‘Rothschild knows.’ ‘Wellington
has lost at Waterloo.’
The selling turned into a panic as people rushed to unload their ‘worthless’
consuls or paper money for gold and silver in the hope of retaining at least part of
their wealth. Consuls continued their nosedive towards oblivion. After several
hours of feverish trading the consul lay in ruins. It was selling for about five cents
on the dollar.
Nathan Rothschild, emotionless and expressionless as ever, still leaned against
his pillar. He continued to give subtle signals. But these signals were different.
They were so subtly different that only the highly trained Rothschild agents could
detect the change. On the cue from their boss dozens of Rothschild agents made
their way to the order desks around the Exchange and bought every consul in
sight for just a ‘song’.
A short time later the ‘official’ news arrived in the British capital. England was now
the master of the European scene. Within seconds the consul skyrocketed to
above its original value. As the significance of the British victory began to sink
into the public consciousness, the value of the consuls rose ever higher.
Napoleon had ‘met his Waterloo.’ Nathan had bought control of the British
economy. Overnight his already vast fortune was multiplied twenty times over. --
Des Griffin, Descent into Slavery, Emissary Publications, pp. 27, 28.
By 1815, the Jesuits had complete control over England. If a leader did not do as
he was told, money would be used to kill, smear, destroy, blackmail, or just drive
the person from office. Later chapters will show that this procedure is being used
today to control people like George Bush and Tony Blair. What was done in
England is being done in many countries today.
As the new nation of America began to spread its wings, it would need a sound
financial base from which to operate. It needed a bank, all right, but the back
used America instead of America using the bank. Financial genius and
opportunist,
Robert Morris organized the first bank. He and his associates believed
that the bank should be modeled after the Bank of England. While the
first bank in North America was not as ruthless as the central banks of today, it
performed many of the operations of a modern central bank. ‘Secret’ investors
put up $400,000 to start this bank. This attempt failed after two short years. We
will identify the ‘secret investors’ in following paragraphs.
Please understand that the central banks being established by the Jesuits and
the Rothschilds are in no way similar to the neighborhood banks that we all use
to manage our money. Let us take a closer look at the central bank and see why
it is so dangerous. We will use the Federal Reserve Bank as an example. Here is
a very simplified scenario that pretty much explains one of the operations of the
Federal Reserve Bank.
It is necessary to understand that the Federal Reserve Bank is not owned by the
United States government as many believe. The central bank, the Federal
Reserve Bank has a total, government-enforced monopoly in money. Before we
had the central bank, each individual bank competed with other banks; the
customers, the consumers, got the best deal. Not any more.
We all know that today the United States government borrows money and
operates under astronomical debt. Why is this? Common sense dictates that a
policy of such enormous debt will sooner or later destroy the organization that
practices it, because the interest on its debt must increase beyond its income,
making payoff impossible.
Now to our scenario. Here, roughly, is how the operation proceeds. Suppose the
United States government wants to borrow a billion dollars. The government
issues a bond for this amount, much as a water company does when it wants to
raise money for a new pipeline or a new dam. The government delivers this bond
for the billion dollars to the Federal Reserve Bank. The Federal Reserve Bank
takes the bond and writes an order to the Department of Printing and Engraving
to print the billion dollars’ worth of bills. After about two weeks or so, when the
bills are printed, the Department of Printing and Engraving ships the bills to the
Federal Reserve Bank, which then writes a check for about two thousand dollars
to pay for printing the billion dollars’ worth of bills. The Federal Reserve Bank
then takes the billion dollars and lends the billion dollars to the United States
government, and the people of the country pay interest at an exorbitant rate each
year on this money, which came out of nothing. The owners of the Federal
Reserve Bank put up nothing for this money.
We see, therefore, that when the United States government goes into debt one
dollar, a dollar plus the interest goes into the pockets of the owners of the
Federal Reserve Bank. This is the largest, the most colossal theft ever
perpetrated
in the history of mankind, and it is so slick, so subtle, and so
obfuscated
by propaganda from the news media that the victims are not
even
aware of what is happening. You can see why the Jesuits want to keep this
operation secret.
The Constitution of the United States gives to Congress the power to coin
money. If Congress coined it own money as the Constitution directs, it would not
have to pay the hundreds of billions of dollars of interest that it now pays each
year to the bankers for the national debt, for money that came out of nothing.
Money coined by Congress would be debt free. All the central banks in other
countries operate the way the Federal Reserve does.
Secretary of the Treasury, Alexander Hamilton, submitted a proposal to Congress
in 1790 for a central bank. Interestingly enough, Hamilton had been an aide of
Robert Morris in the initial experience of central banking in North America.
Surprisingly, during the Constitutional convention of 1787,
Hamilton had been a strong supporter of sound money. That Hamilton completely
shifted within three years and proposed a central bank, which could generate
money as the Federal Reserve Bank does, shows that Hamilton’s loyalty was
compromised by the Jesuits.
This is hard to reconcile, and one must suspect that, even the most well
intentioned of men can become corrupted by the temptations of wealth and
power. -- G. Edward Griffin, The Creature from Jekyll Island, American Opinion,
p. 328.
Note carefully Griffin’s conclusion. For Alexander Hamilton to have shifted so
drastically within a few short years would lead us to believe that he had been
bribed or blackmailed by the ‘secret investors’; either that , or joined them.
Thomas Jefferson clearly saw what a central bank would do to America. He
declared,
A private central bank issuing the public currency is a greater menace to the
liberties of the people than a standing army. -- The Writings of Thomas Jefferson,
Volume X, G. P. Putnam & Sons, page 31.
Jefferson realized that if a central bank was ever set up in America, the bankers
would have virtually unlimited amounts of money to control how lawmakers
voted, and to control the media and what they said. Within a short time, these
bankers would essentially rewrite the Constitution and the Bill of Rights by the
unconstitutional laws that they would pass. Thomas Jefferson was completely
correct, for today we have enough laws, such as the USA Patriotic Act and the
Homeland Security Act, to literally convert the United States in a police state,
when all the provisions of these acts are implemented.
Just like the old Bank of North America, the new Bank of the United States had
eighty percent of its initial funding capital provide by ‘secret’ investors, and the
government put up only twenty percent. Whoever these ‘secret’ investors were,
they had tremendous power in America because they had control of the money in
America. Many books written about this time period tell us who these people
were.
Under the surface, the Rothschilds long had a powerful influence in dictating
American financial laws. The law records show that they were the power in the
old Bank of the United States. -- Gustavus Myers, History of the Great American
Fortunes, Random House, p. 556 [emphasis added].
Over the years since N.M. [Nathan Rothschild], the Manchester textile
manufacturer, had bought cotton from the Southern states, Rothschilds had
developed heavy American commitments. Nathan... had made loans to various
states of the Union, had been, for a time, the official European banker for US
government and was a pledged supporter of the Bank of the United States. --
Derek Wilson, Rothschild: The Wealth and Power of a Dynasty, Charles
Scribner’s Sons, p. 178.
The Rothschilds and the Jesuits have been using their vast wealth to take over
the United States through traitorous politicians for a great many years.
During the time of the Rothschilds in Victorian England, Benjamin Disraeli was
the Prime Minister for many years. In 1844, he wrote a political novel entitled
Coningsby. One of the key characters in the book was a very powerful merchant
and banker by the name of Sidonia. It is apparent from the events chronicled,
that Sidonia is really Nathan Rothschild of England. In the book, Disraeli
declares,
Europe did require money, and Sidonia [Nathan Rothschild] was ready to lend it
to Europe. France wanted some, Austria more; Prussia a little; Russia a few
millions. Sidonia could furnish them all.
It is not difficult to conceive that, after having pursued the career we have
intimated for about ten years, Sidonia [Nathan Rothschild] had become one of
the most considerable personages in Europe. He had established a brother, or a
near relative, in whom he could confide, in most of the principal capitals. He was
lord and master of the money market of the world, and of course virtually lord and
master of everything else. He literally held the revenues of Southern Italy in
pawn; and monarchs and ministers of all countries courted his advice and were
guided by his suggestions. -- Benjamin Disraeli, Coningsby, Alfred A. Knopf, p.
225 [emphasis added].
The Jesuits and the Rothschilds would settle for nothing less.
After the Hamilton Central Bank failed, the Jesuits were able to establish a third
central bank using Nicholas Biddle as their agent in 1816. The charter for this
bank ran until 1826. Biddle made an attempt to renew the charter of this third
bank during the Presidential campaign of 1832. Biddle believed that Andrew
Jackson would not dare to risk his second term in office by opposing him, so
Biddle felt this was the perfect time to renew the bank’s charter. Andrew Jackson
understood the dangers of the central bank and vetoed the bill to renew the
bank’s charter. Jackson’s argument was simple.
Is there no danger to our liberty and independence in a bank that in its nature
has so little to bind it to our country?...[Is there not] cause to tremble for the purity
of our elections in peace and for the independence of our country in war?...Of the
course which would be pursued by a bank almost wholly owned by the subjects
of a foreign power, and managed by those whose interests, if not affections,
would run in the same direction there can be no doubt...Controlling our currency,
receiving our public monies, and holding thousands of our citizens in
dependence, it would be more formidable and dangerous than a naval and
military power of the enemy. -- Herman E. Kross, Documentary History of
Banking and Currency in the United States, Chelsea House, pp. 26, 27.
Jackson feared that the foreigners, who wanted to dominate and control America,
would use the central bank to destroy her. The Rothschilds and the Jesuits have
been doing just that for many years. The following quote shows how Nicholas
Biddle manipulated the Congress.
Biddle had one powerful advantage over his adversary. For all practical
purposes, Congress was is his pocket. Or, more accurately, the product of his
generosity was in the pockets of Congressmen. Following the Rothschild
Formula, Biddle had been careful to reward compliant politicians with success in
the business world. Few of them would bite the hand that fed them. Even the
great Senator, Daniel Webster, found himself kneeling at Biddle’s throne.-- G.
Edward Griffin, The Creature from Jekyll Island, American Opinion, p. 351.
By the early 1830s the Biddle-Rothschild-Jesuit plan was working perfectly. They
controlled the Congress of the United States by giving them money to become
successful in the business world. As long as the Congressmen voted as they
were told, their businesses did well, but if they disobeyed the bankers, their
money and other resources were withheld, and their businesses failed.
Biddle was not without resources. In keeping with his belief that banking was the
ultimate source of power, he had regularly advanced funds to members of
Congress when delay on appropriations bills had held up their pay. Daniel
Webster was, at various times, a director of the Bank and on retainer as its
counsel. "I believe my retainer has not been renewed or refreshed as usual. If it
be wished that my relation to the Bank be continued, it may be well to send me
the usual retainers." Numerous other men of distinction had been
accommodated, including members of the press. -- John Kenneth Galbraith,
Money: Whence it Came, Where it Went, Houghton Mifflin, page 80.
Webster's record in Congress had previously been in behalf of sound money.
When Biddle bought Webster with money and other enticements, he succumbed
and became a supporter of the corrupt banking objectives of Biddle. Webster
became one of the central banks most avid supporters. How tragic that Daniel
Webster did not have the moral courage to withstand Biddle's bribes! In the early
1830s, Congress had many Jesuits seeking to secretly undermine the great
principles of our Constitution.
When Andrew Jackson finally ousted Nicholas Biddle and the central bank, he
had to face other things such as Jesuit assassins.
With these accomplishments close on the heels of his victory over the Bank, the
President had earned the undying hatred of monetary scientists, both in America
and abroad. It is not surprising, therefore. that on January 30, 1835, an
assassination attempt was made against him. Miraculously, both pistols of the
assailant misfired, and Jackson was spared by a quirk of fate. It was the first
such attempt to be made against the life of a President of the United States. The
would-be assassin was Richard Lawrence who either was truly insane or who
pretended to be insane to escape harsh punishment. At any rate, Lawrence was
found not guilty due to insanity. Later, he boasted to friends that he had been in
touch with powerful people in Europe who had promised to protect him from
punishment should he be caught. -- G. Edward Griffin, The Creature from Jekyll
Island, American Opinion, p. 357.
The Rothschild-Jesuit conspirators are ruthless, sick individuals who will stop at
nothing until Protestantism and the United States are destroyed, and the papacy
rules the world again.
The Rothschilds and the Jesuits needed to regroup. For the next 20 years, the
name of the game was assassination as two presidents were poisoned and one
was almost killed by poisoning. Then, the guns of war were heard in America as
the Civil War reddened American soil. According to German Chancellor, Otto von
Bismarck, all this was carefully planned.
The division of the United States in federations of equal force was decided long
before the Civil War by the high financial powers of Europe. These bankers were
afraid that the United States, if they remained in one block and as one nation,
would attain economic and financial independence, which would upset their
financial domination over Europe and the world. Of course, in the 'inner circle' of
Finance, the voice of the Rothschilds prevailed. They saw an opportunity for
prodigious booty if they could substitute two feeble democracies, burdened with
debt to the financiers,...in place of a vigorous Republic sufficient unto herself.
Therefore, they sent their emissaries into the field to exploit the question of
slavery and to drive a wedge between the tow parts of the Union...The rupture
between the North and the South became inevitable; the masters of European
finance employed all their forces to bring it about and to turn it their advantage. --
[Quoted in] G. Edward Griffin, The Creature from Jekyll Island, American Opinion,
p. 374.
The Rothschilds and Jesuits used the Civil War to divide the United States into
two contending countries. This would make America weak and much easier to
control. It would result in political and constitutional control, along with material
wealth in America, and would facilitate America becoming enslaved to the Jesuits
of Rome. In spite of the fact that the Civil War failed to accomplish the destruction
of the United States, the Jesuits achieved much of their goal anyway, as
conditions in the United States plainly show today.
President Lincoln understood the insidious hand of the Rothschilds and the
Jesuit schemers in the Civil War. He knew that they were relentless in their
pursuit of the destruction of the United States. Lincoln greatly feared for the
survival of America and did everything he could to defeat their purposes. He said,
The money power [the Rothschilds and the Jesuits] preys upon the nation in
times of peace and conspires against it in times of adversity. It is more despotic
than monarchy, more insolent than autocracy, more selfish than bureaucracy. I
see in the near future a crisis approaching that unnerves me and causes me to
tremble for the safety of my country. Corporations have been enthroned, an era
of corruption will follow, and the money power of the country will endeavor to
prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices of the people, until the wealth is
aggregated in a few hands, and the republic is destroyed. -- Archer Shaw, ed.,
The Lincoln Encyclopedia: The Spoken and Written Words of A. Lincoln,
Macmillan, p. 40.
How prophetic; that is exactly what has happened.
Abraham Lincoln was that the Rothschild-Jesuit scheme was compromising the
leaders of America. By utilizing their endless supplies of money, these evil men
controlled many political leaders at the highest levels of the American
government, and that was in the mid 1800s. Today the situation is much worse.
American politicians are selling their country to the Jesuits for the chance to be
wealthy and influential. We saw that even the great Daniel Webster was a pawn
in their hands. In a speech in 2837, Lincoln declared, No foreign power or
combination of foreign powers could by force take a drink from the Ohio or make
a track on the Blue Ridge. At what point, then, is the approach of danger to be
expected? If it ever reaches us, it must spring from among us, it cannot come
from abroad. If destruction be our lot, we must ourselves be its author and
finisher. As a nation of freedom, we must live through all time or die of suicide. --
Joan Veon, The United Nations' Global Straightjacket, Hearthstone Publishing, p.
64.
Greed, selfishness, and financial gain are used to compromise politicians to pass
laws defeating the purpose of the Constitution, and to take America down a path
never intended by our Founding Fathers. These politicians adopt governing
principles like those of communism and the French Revolution. Following the
awful bloodbath called the Civil War the nation was bleeding, and things were in
disarray. The country was quite vulnerable to more Jesuit mischief, and they took
good advantage of it.
Chapter 4: Thaddeus Stevens and the Trashing of the Constitution
Anyone who saw the Congress of the 1860s would declare that Thaddeus
Stevens was undeniably in charge.
His tremendous power as a party leader lay in the biting bitterness of his tongue
and the dominating arrogance of his manner, before which weaker men
shriveled. When a colleague dared question the wisdom of his policy, he relied
with studied contempt that he did not 'propose either to take his counsel,
recognize his authority, or believe a word he says.' His flings were consuming
flame, his invective terrible to withstand.... One who observed him well thought
that 'the intensity of his hatred was almost next to infernal.' There were no neutral
tones in his vocabulary.... He had no sympathy with failure. Thus there was a
hardness about him that made men dread him. Time and again he was to enter a
party caucus with sentiment against him to tongue-lash his followers into line. It
was easier to follow than to cross him. He had all the domineering arrogance of
the traditional boss. He brooked no opposition. Schurz [A colleague of Stevens]
noted even in his conversation, 'a certain absolutism of opinion with
contemptuous scorn for adverse argument.' He was a dictator who handed down
his decrees and woe to the rebel who would reject him.... And he could not
compromise - that was a once his strength and weakness. It made him a leader
while he lived, and a failure in the perspective of the years. He held no council,
heeded no advice, hearkened to no warning, and with an iron will he pushed
forward as his instinct bade, defying, if need be, the opinion of his time, and
turning it by sheer force to his purpose. A striking figure on the canvas of history -
stern, arrogant, intense, with a threatening light in his eye, and something
between a sneer and a Voltairian smile upon his thin, hard lips. Such was the
greatest party and congressional leader of his time. -- Claude Bowers, The Tragic
Era, AMS Press, pp. 74, 84.
He was in his sixties at the time, slowing due to age and illness, but his mind had
lost none of its invective. He was not a particularly brilliant man. He made sure
that everyone knew exactly where he stood, and he expected everyone to stand
with him. If they did not, he made sure that they knew he was very unhappy
about it. This radical, Thaddeus Stevens, controlled the Congress and applied all
his overbearing and caustic manner to bring about one of the greatest revolutions
in American since 1776. By his influence, certain hidden changes were
implemented into the Reconstruction Amendments that did so much more than
provide freedom and equality for the slaves, but rather attacked the very rationale
for the Bill of Rights.
We have seen that the banished Jesuit Order used the wealth of the Rothschild
to finance Adam Weishaupt in founding the Illuminati on May 1 1776. We have
also seen that the principles laid out by the Jesuits and Weishaupt were carried
out in the French Revolution. Two years after the Constitution of the United
States was ratified, the Jesuits carried out their principles of government in the
French Revolution. These two antagonistic forms of government were laid open
for all the world to see. The Constitution guaranteed Republican government
where the government was founded on law, and every citizen was equal before
the law. In France, however, the great cry was for democracy.
At that time (1789) France was the richest and most populous nation on the
continent of Europe; and it was here that the 'Great Experiment in Democracy'
began. The battle cry was 'liberty, equality, and fraternity.' The vehicle was
Socialism. -- Dee Zahner, The Secret Side of History, LTAA Communications
Publishers, p. 34.
The United States of America is not a democracy. It is a republic, and there is a
big difference between the two. A pure democracy is based solely on the majority
without any restrictions on what the majority can do. An excellent example of a
democracy is a lynch mob. The majority wants to hang the person, and the
minority, the person to be hanged, does not want to be hanged. They have a
vote, and then hang the person. In a pure democracy, the minority is the victim of
the majority.
In contrast, a Republic is founded on a set of laws that govern what the majority
can and cannot do. The law on which the United States; Republic is founded is
the Constitution. For instance, the Constitution says,
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or
prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the
press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the
government for a redress of grievances. -- First amendment to the Constitution.
If a law was proposed in Congress to set up a national religion, and everyone in
Congress voted for it, it still cannot be done, because the Constitution prohibits
this type of law. The Constitution says that the government is not permitted to
pass any law concerning religion. During the Dark Ages, over 150 million
Christians were put to death because they would not abide by the universal
religion at that time. The same thing would happen in America if America were a
pure democracy.
The word democracy cannot be found in the Constitution or in the Declaration of
Independence, or in any of the state's constitutions. Many of the Founders of the
United States tried to warn about the dangers of a pure democracy.
Democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever
been found incompatible with personal security or the rights of property; and
have in general been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their
death. -- James Madison, Federalist Paper #10.
Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon, exhausts, and murders itself.
There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide. -- John Adams,
The Works of John Adams, Vol. 6, New Library Press, p. 484.
If America had been established as a pure democracy, it would have long since
ceased to exist.
What we learn to-day from the study of the Great Revolution [French
Revolution]... is that it was the source and origin of all the present communist,
anarchist, and socialist conceptions.... up till now, modern socialism has added
absolutely nothing to the ideas that were circulating among the French people
between 1789 and 1794.... Modern socialism has only systematized those ideas
and found arguments in their favor. -- Nesta Webster, The French Revolution,
Noontide Press, p. 5.
The French Revolution was a source for communist, anarchist, and socialist
conceptions; conceptions that, when carried to conclusion, resulted in the
necessity of installing drainage systems to carry away the torrents of blood that
flowed from French guillotines. These same 'conceptions' applied during the
twentieth century have resulted in the murder of well over one hundred million
human beings. There is much to learn from the Great Revolution. -- Dee Zahner,
The Secret Side of History, LTAA Communications, p. 35.
At the same time anarchy is seeking to sweep away all law, not only divine, but
human. The centralizing of wealth and power; the vast combinations for the
enriching of the few at the expense of the many; the combinations of the poorer
classes for the defense of their interests and claims; the spirit of unrest, of riot
and bloodshed; the world-wide dissemination of the same teachings that led to
the French Revolution - all are tending to involve the whole world in a struggle
similar to that which convulsed France. -- E.G. White, Education, Pacific Press
Publishing Association, p. 228.
The principles of democracy or mob rule have filled this world with blood.
Thaddeus Stevens was most instrumental in bringing the ideals of the French
Revolution to America under the guise of bringing freedoms to the downtrodden
slaves.
As we have seen, the ideas of Karl Marx were nothing new. He simply took the
ideas of the Jesuits and Weishaupt and codified them into the Communist
Manifesto.
In actual fact the Communist Manifesto was in circulation for many years before
Marx' name was widely enough recognized to establish his authorship for this
revolutionary handbook. All Karl Marx really did was update and codify the very
same revolutionary plans and principles set down seventy years earlier by Adam
Weishaupt, the founder of the Order of the Illuminati in Bavaria. And, it is widely
acknowledged by serious scholars of this subject that the League of the Just Men
was simply an extension of the Illuminati. -- Gary Allen, None Dare Call it
Conspiracy, Concord, p. 25.
The principles of democracy, communism, and the French Revolution, codified
by Karl Marx, are seen in countless countries in the twentieth century. From the
purges in Russia by Josef Stalin, to Mao Tse Tung's Reign of Terror in China, to
Pol Pot in Cambodia and numerous others, the results of Jesuitism have filled
this world with misery, pain, suffering, and death. Will the United States, the
greatest bastion of Republican government, fall as well?
After the Civil War, America was in shambles. The South had to start all over
again. Over three million slaves, who had only known the cotton fields and hard
labor, were now free. Carpetbaggers were pillaging an already depleted South.
Abraham Lincoln, the man who guided America through the bloody Civil War,
was dead from a Jesuit assassin's bullet. Great struggles faced the war-torn
nation.
Lincoln, like Andrew Johnson after him, wanted to allow the seceded Southern
states back in the Union, but a group in Congress called the Radical Red
Republicans objected. They wanted some things changed before they would
allow that. They were instrumental in having the 13th, 14th, and 15th
Amendments placed into the Constitution. The amendments, in part, are stated
below and on the surface look very good. However, as after declarations were
made, it became clear that freedom and equality for the Afro-American free man
was used to create an entirely new citizenship, which broadened the powers of
the national government and attacked the Bill of Rights. This was the same
method used in France; the peasants were struggling under horrible difficulties,
so the reign of terror granted them liberty and equality. Hidden beneath this was
a drive to expand the power of the government and entrench the peasants in
bondage still.
13th
[Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for
crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the
United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
14th
[Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the
jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they
reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges
or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any
person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any
person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
15th
Section 1. The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or
abridged by the United States or by any state on account of race, color, or
previous condition of servitude.
Section 2. The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate
legislation.]
Notice the following statements from Justices of the Supreme Court and actual
cases where these amendments were interpreted. These amendments were
interpreted far beyond freedom and equality for the black man.
The following statement is from the Slaughterhouse Cases of 1872. Notice how
the Supreme Court interpreted the case in light of the 14th Amendment.
We are of the opinion that the rights claimed by these plaintiffs in error
[fundamental common-law rights] if they have any existence are not privileges
and immunities of citizens of the United States within the meaning of the clause
of the 14th Amendment under consideration. -- Slaughter-House Cases, 83 US
36, 80 (1872)
According to the first Supreme Court case in which the 14th Amendment was
considered, it was interpreted to mean that the Bill of Rights would not be
considered as privileges and immunities of 14th Amendment U.S. citizenship.
This stance of the Supreme Court continued and was spelled out very clearly in
subsequent cases.
The right of trial by jury in civil cases, guaranteed by the 7th Amendment... and
the right to bear arms, guaranteed by the 2nd Amendment, have been distinctly
held not to be privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States,
guaranteed by the 14th Amendment... the decision rested upon the ground that
this clause of the 14th Amendment did not forbid the states to abridge the
personal rights enumerated in the first eight Amendments, because those rights
were not within the meaning of the clause 'privileges and immunities of citizens of
the United States. -- Twining v. New Jersey, 211 US 97, 105, 106, (1908)
Many people, who lived during that time, recognized that the Constitution was
under attack by Thaddeus Stevens and his followers. That the Constitution was
under direct attack after the Civil War is apparent from the books written about
that era, from the news papers, and from the speeches made by president
Andrew Johnson.
Never have American public men in responsible positions, directing the destiny of
the Nation, been so brutal, hypocritical and corrupt. The Constitution was treated
as a doormat on which politicians and army officers wiped their feet after wading
in the muck... So appalling is the picture of these revolutionary years that even
historians have preferred to overlook many essential things. Thus, Andrew
Johnson, who fought the bravest battle for constitutional liberty and for the
preservation of our institutions ever waged by an Executive, until recently was left
in the pillory to which unscrupulous gamblers for power consigned him... and the
London 'Times' was commenting that 'it is the Constitution rather than Mr.
Johnson that is in danger.” – Claude Bowers, The Tragic Era, AMS Press,
emphasis supplied, p. 157.
The Constitution was a doormat for politicians to walk on with their muddy feet!
The Constitution was in grave danger of being trashed!! These are appalling
statements in the light of the glorious, Protestant principles that that document
represents. It is very clear, that following the Civil War; the Constitution came
under furious attack from 'American' politicians who were bent on bringing
America under the sway of the Principles of Communism/Illuminism/Jesuitism,
And they would use the good and noble, which was freeing of the slaves, in order
to diabolically undermine the Bill of Rights. Is this not still happening today? We
hear so much about 'defending freedom', which sounds great, while American
liberties are trampled in the dust by Patriot Acts I and II.
Here are some excerpts from speeches made by President Andrew Johnson.
While reading these, remember that Andrew Johnson was almost removed from
office because he refused to go along with the Radical Red Republicans.
I love the Constitution: I intend to plant myself, with the confident hope and belief
that if the Union remains together, in less than four years the now triumphant
party will be overthrown. -- ibid. p. 33.
The best efforts of my life have been exerted for the maintenance of the
Constitution, the enforcement of the laws, and the preservation of the Union of
the States. -- ibid. p. 162
.
Greeted cordially at Baltimore, he had said he Would rather be a free citizen than
be inaugurated President ‘over the ruins of the Constitution,’ and ‘rather be a free
man than be President and be a slave.’ – ibid, p. 241.
“The President stands squarely against Congress and the people.” Wrote the
indignant Julian. “Neither Jefferson nor Jackson… ever asserted with such
fearless fidelity and ringing emphasis the fundamental principles of civil liberty,”
said the New York World. – ibid, p. 102.
It has been my fate for the last five years to fight those who have been opposed
to the Union... I intend to fight all opponents of the Constitution... to fight the
enemies of this glorious Union forever and forever. – ibid, p. 132
.
According to Constitutional scholar, George P. Fletcher, Cardazo Professor of
Jurisprudence at Columbia University:
The Civil War called forth a new constitutional order. At the heart of this
postbellum legal order lay the Reconstruction Amendments-the Thirteenth,
Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments, ratified in the years 1865 to 1870. The
principles of this new legal regime are so radically different from our original
Constitution, drafted in 1787, that they deserve to be recognized as a second
American constitution. The new constitution established, in fact a second
American Republic. The first Constitution was based on the principles of
peoplehood as a voluntary association, individual freedom, and republican
elitism. The guiding premises of the second constitution were, in contrast,
organic nationhood, equality of all persons, and popular democracy. These are
Principles radically opposed to each other. – George P. Fletcher, Our Secret
Constitution, Oxford University Press, p. 2.
This professor at Columbia University recognized that the thirteenth, fourteenth,
and fifteenth amendments brought about a completely different constitution that
the one established in 1787. He declared that these amendments created a new
constitution. As we have seen from subsequent court cases after the passing of
those Amendments, it is clear that that is exactly what Stevens and Rome
wanted to do.
Summing it up, by 1868 the Jesuits, with their radicals Thaddeus Stevens and
Charles Sumner, had forced the Fourteenth Amendment on the peoples of the
States, North and South. They had created a new nation as a result of a new
citizenship. By 1872 the Jesuits, with their radicals on the Supreme Court, had
made the powers of both the Federal and State governments absolute, limited
only by decisions of their respective King’s benches- the Federal and State
Supreme Courts. The transition from a Presbyterian form of government to a
Roman Catholic form of government had been accomplished. And how did they
do it? By declaring that the Bill of Rights were not privileges and immunities of
Fourteenth Amendment citizenship, thereby overthrowing the ancient liberties. –
Eric Phelps, Vatican Assassins, Halycon Unified Services, p. 327.
We are at a loss for words in describing the dismal, diabolical and demoralizing
depravity of this singular man... he was the great tool of the Jesuits in creating
their socialist-communist monster of the Twentieth Century, Fourteenth
Amendment America. He was called a ‘traitor’ by President Johnson while he
‘destroyed the government of the Old Union, changed its form and spirit, and
made a new Union with new theories and new powers.’ Horace Greeley, one of
Stevens’ masters, adds, ‘We have brought all laborers to a common level... by
reducing the whole working population, white and black, to a condition of
serfdom.’ On his deathbed this old communist ‘commoner’ was baptized into the
Roman Catholic Institution for a job well done in obedience to the Papal Caesar’s
tyrannical Holy Alliance and the Black Pope’s evil Council of Trent. –ibid, p. 331
.
In light of the heinous and destructive work of Thaddeus Stevens and the Radical
Republicans, it is easy to conclude that they were the tools of Rome in destroying
the great Protestant Constitution. No more wicked and diabolical men ever
walked the land of the free and the home of the brave. Further insights into the
life of Thaddeus Stevens add more and more evidence of Rome’s vicious
involvement in the undermining of the constitution done in the name of freedom
and equality.
Early in his life, Stevens was very poor. As a result, he always held a manifest
contempt for the aristocrats and the wealthy. He always held that the wealthy
were made that way because they had exploited the poor. Throughout his
political career, Stevens always sided with the poor. However, in the famous
conflict between Andrew Jackson and Nicholas Biddle, Stevens did a very
strange thing. Jackson was siding with the common man in America, fighting
against the Biddle-Rothschild-Jesuit front that sought to enslave America. One
would think that Stevens would automatically side with Jackson and the common
people. However, this was not the case.
This enemy of aristocracy fairly frothed with rage Against the Jacksonian
Democracy, and fought with fervor for the moneyed aristocracy represented by
Nicholas Biddle and the Bank. In his earlier years he had been as fervent in the
support of the Hamiltonian aristocracy. It is these marked contradictions in his
character that make him so difficult of analysis. – Claude Bowers, The Tragic Era,
AMS Press p. 68.
The contradictions in Stevens can be readily understood in light of his
involvement with the Jesuits-Rothschilds. Naturally, Stevens stood with common
people, but when his masters told him otherwise, then he would throw out his
principles and do as he was told. How else would one explain the flagrant
contradictions in this man?
Steven had no religious convictions. He never attended church. However, one
very interesting note about his religious life surfaces from the book by Claude
Bowers.
He attended no church, which, within itself, would have colored the general
impression of his character in the community in which he lived. For the Baptists
he had a certain sentimental regard due to the fact that it was the church of his
mother, but he was probably a free thinker... ‘That his mind was a howling
wilderness, so far as his sense of his obligation to God was concerned,’ was the
opinion of Jeremiah Black; and Senator Grimes disliked him as ‘a debauchee in
morals.’ Even so, one of his best friends was a Catholic priest in Lancaster, with
whom he liked to talk and walk; and he was tenderly fond of children, and
extremely sensitive to the appeals of the poor, to whom he was unvaryingly
generous. – ibid. p. 78, 79, emphasis supplied.
In the light of the devilish route that Stevens took America and the beloved Bill of
Rights, his close association with this Catholic priest would lead one to conclude
that this priest had great influence over Stevens mind and served as his mentor
in delineating to him exactly what path he was to pursue. That Stevens sought to
undermine the Protestant Constitution declares that Stevens got the ideas from
somewhere and his close association with this priest could certainly be one of the
paths through which the Jesuit Order got to Stevens and twisted his willing mind!!
The other great influence in Stevens’ life from the Catholic Church came from his
maid and then live-in-lover of many years; namely on Lydia Smith.
In the rear of his house in Lancaster, among the fruit trees, stood a little house,
occupied by Lydia Smith and her husband, a very black negro barber, with their
two children, likewise black. Mrs. Smith was mulatto, and was engaged as
housekeeper for the bachelor lawyer. [Stevens] After a time the husband died,
and the widow moved into the master’s house, and there she lived for many
years. When Stevens went to Washington, she accompanied him there.
Wherever he was, there she was also... That she was devoted to Stevens was
evident to all. In time, as he grew feeble, she became indispensable, acting as a
buffer between him and those who would unnecessarily sap his strength... This
assumption that she was Steven’s mistress was not confined, however to
undertone gossip, which is never impressive. It was current in the press, and in
no instance was the publisher rebuked or threatened with a libel suit.... The
housekeeper [Smith] lived with her husband until his death, and many years later
was buried by his side in the Catholic cemetery in Lancaster... Many ascribed his
deep-seated hatred for the Southern whites to the influence of Lydia. His
fondness for her is shown in the fact that there is in Lancaster to day a portrait of
this comely mulatto from the brush of Esholtz, a prominent painter who also did a
portrait of Stevens. – ibid. pp. 80, 81, 83.
At Stevens deathbed, we read
There were Lydia Smith and the two Sisters, Loretta and Genevieve. As he was
sinking rapidly, the doctor asked him how he felt. ‘Very mean, Doctor.’ Then
Sister Loretta asked permission to baptize him in the Catholic faith. Lydia Smith
was kneeling at the foot of the bed; the two Sisters were on their knees reading
the prayers for the dying. And this Thaddeus Stevens passed to eternity. At the
moment, his hand was in that of Sister Loretta, his breast heaved, he pressed
her hand, and thus the end came. A year before he had said that when sick, he
would rather send a hundred miles to have her with him at the end than most
ministers he knew. – ibid. p. 222.
From these statements by Bowers, we can glean many things. Stevens was very
attached to Smith and obviously was living in an illicit relationship with her. Smith
was a devout Roman Catholic and had a tremendous influence on Stevens. At
Stevens’ deathbed, he was baptized by two Catholic nuns into the Catholic faith
for the great service that Stevens had performed in behalf of the Catholic Church.
It is clear that the influence of the Catholic priest of Lancaster and Lydia Smith
were both instrumental in bringing Thaddeus Stevens to the mind-set of swinging
America from Protestantism to Catholicism. Only in the light of eternity will the
heinous crimes of these people be fully realized.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Chapter 5: Tightening the Noose
After the Jesuits’ attempts to destroy the fledgling United States, they
concentrated on another goal that had eluded them for many years. They had
desperately tried to establish a central bank under Robert Morris, Alexander
Hamilton, and Nicholas Biddle, but each attempt had failed. During the
devastating Civil War, Augustus Belmont, a rabid Jesuit and Rothschild agent,
tried to coerce Lincoln into establishing a central bank, but Lincoln understood
the damage a central bank would cause to the country, and he refused.
With new gusto and a different approach, the Jesuits and the Rothschilds tried
again.
They realized, as Lenin had that the establishment of a central bank
was
90% of communizing a nation. – Fritz Springmeier, Bloodlines of the
Illuminati,
Ambassador House, p. 268.
In the mid 1750s, the Rothschilds and the Schiffs moved into the same
residence, a large duplex house in Frankfurt, Germany, where their families lived
together.
He [The father Rothschild] had five daughters and five sons.... He moved from
his old house, the “Haus Zur Interfann,” to a new one, “Green Shield....” when he
started making more money. Green Shield was a dual residency and the other
half was occupied by the Schiff family who were to Play an important role later on
as agents of the Rothschilds. – ibid, p. 244.
About 100 years after the two families lived together in Frankfurt, Germany,
Jacob Schiff was born. He was a wizard at finances and developed the
underhanded shrewdness of the Rothschilds. In 1865, as the Civil War is ending,
young 18-year-old Jacob left Germany and came to America.
Ten years later he became the partner of the Illuminati firm Kuhn, Loeb &
Company. Ten years after that he became its president. [It was here that Schiff
was] directing Rothschild and Illuminati affairs from this seat of authority.
Jacob Schiff was also on the board of directors of Central Trust Company,
Western Union, and Wells Fargo Company. – ibid, p. 268.
Between the end of the Civil War and 1914, their main agents in the United
States were Kuhn, Loeb and Co. and the J.P. Morgan Co.
A brief history of Kuhn, Loeb and Co. appeared in Newsweek magazine on
February 1, 1936: “Abraham Kuhn and Solomon Loeb were general merchandise
merchants in Lafayette, Indiana, in 1850. As usual in newly settled regions, most
transactions were on credit. They soon found out that they were bankers... In
1867, they established Kuhn, Loeb and Co., bankers, in New Your City, and took
in a young German immigrant, Jacob Schiff, as partner. Young Schiff had
important financial connections in Europe. After ten years, Jacob Schiff was head
of Kuhn, Loeb and Co., Kuhn having died and Loeb retired. Under Schiff’s
guidance, the house brought European capital into contact with American
industry.”
Schiff’s ‘important financial connections in Europe’ were the Rothschilds and their
German representatives, the M.M. Warburg Company of Hamburg Amsterdam.
Within twenty years the Rothschilds, through their Warburg-Schiff connection,
had provided the capital that enabled John D. Rockefeller to greatly expand his
Standard Oil empire. They also financed the activities of Edward Harriman
(Railroads) and Andrew Carnegie (Steel). – Des Griffin, Descent into Slavery,
Emissary Publications, pp. 36, 37.
Couple that with this statement:
J.P. Morgan was brought into banking by his father, Junius Morgan, in England.
The Morgans were friendly competitors with the Rothschilds and became socially
close to them. Morgan’s London-based firm was saved from financial ruin in 1857
by the Bank of England over which the Rothschilds held great influence.
Thereafter, Morgan appears to have served as a Rothschild financial agent and
went to great length to appear totally American. – G. Edward Griffin, The
Creature from Jekyll Island, American Opinion, p. 209.
Again, in the mid 1800’s another German Illuminist was sent on a mission from
the house of Rothschild to accomplish a goal of this New Order For the Ages. His
name was Jacob Henry Schiff (1847-1920). He came to New York first for the
sole purpose of getting control of the United States monetary system. He
eventually became the head of the banking firm of Kuhn, Loeb and Company. He
bought Kuhn & Loeb out later with Rothschild money.
Using charity as a front to hide his Illuminati One World Government activities,
Jacob Schiff became one of the most important successors of Albert Pike in
leading the United States toward anarchy. As stated by Lenin earlier, one of the
first goals of the communists is to get control of all monetary systems of the
world. And this was to be Jacob Schiff’s first achievement. – William Sutton, The
New Age Movement and Illuminati 666, Institute of Religious Knowledge, pp.
234, 235.
Thus, we see that the Jesuits-Rothschilds sent Jacob Sciff to the United States at
the end of the Civil War to gain enough control over the American financial
system that it would be impossible for America to refuse a central bank. Schiff
used Jesuit-Rothschild money to finance J.P. Morgan, John D. Rockefeller,
Edward Harriman, and Andrew Carnegie. Through the companies owned by
these four individuals, shipping, energy, oil, transportation, railroads, import,
exports, and steel with its associate businesses, would be involved. These
financial giants branched off into so many other business enterprises that it
simply boggles the mind. To say the least, the financial power gained by Schiff by
1900 was absolutely staggering! We must keep in mind the statement of F.
Tupper Saussy, which says:
Aware that the Rothschilds are an important Jewish family, I looked them up in
Encyclopedia Judaica and discovered that they bear the title “Guardians of the
Vatican Treasurey... The appointment of Rothschild gave the black papacy
absolute financial privacy and secrecy. Who would ever search a family of
orthodox Jews for the key to the wealth of the Roman Catholic Church? – F.
Tupper Saussy, Rulers of Evil, Osprey Bookmakers, pp. 160, 161.
Saussy’s reference to the “black papacy” is a reference to the Jesuits. The head
Jesuit, the Jesuit general, is referred to quite frequently as the black pope.
In their relentless drive to abolish freedom in America without firing a shot, the
Jesuits used their financial agents to so dominate American business and the
banking system that they were able to push a central bank on the unsuspecting
American people. This time, the central bank did not fail.
While Schiff was constantly increasing in wealth, influence, and power, the
Jesuits-Rothschilds sent yet another agent to complete the goal of establishing a
central bank in America. Their man was Paul Warburg.
At the turn of the century the Rothschilds, not satisfied with the progress being
made by their American operations, sent one of their top experts, Paul Moritz
Warburg, over to New York to take direct charge of their assault upon the only
true champion of individual liberty and prosperity – the United States.
At a hearing of the House Committee on Banking and Currency in 1913, Warburg
revealed that he was ‘a member of the banking firm of Kuhn, Loeb and Co. I
came to this country in 1902, having been born and educated in the banking in
Hamburg, Germany, and studied banking in London and Paris, and have gone all
around the world...’
At the end of the last century people didn’t ‘study banking in London and Paris’
and go ‘all around the world unless they had a special mission to perform!
Early in 1907, Jacob Schiff, the Rothschild-owned boss of Kuhn, Loeb and Co.,
in a speech to the New York Chamber of Commerce, warned that ‘unless we
have a Central Bank with adequate control of credit resources, this country is
going to undergo the most severe and far reaching money panic in its history.’
Shortly thereafter, the United States plunged into a monetary crisis that had all
the earmarks of a skillfully planned Rothschild ‘job.’ The ensuing panic financially
ruined tens of thousands of innocent people across the country, and made
billions for the banking elite. The purpose for the ‘crisis’ was two-fold:
1. To make a financial ‘killing’ for the Insiders, and
2. To impress on the American people the ‘great need’ for a central bank.
Paul Warburg told the Banking and Currency Committee: “In the Panic of 1907,
the first suggestion I made was, ‘let us have a national clearing house” [Central
Bank]. The Aldrich Plan [for a Central Bank] contains many things that are simply
fundamental rules of banking. – Des Griffin, Decent Into Slavery, Emissary
Publications, p. 37.
The [Jesuit] Illuminati interests wanted to create a Central Bank in America. They
wanted to build the Federal Reserve. First, they needed a bunch of banking
crisis’ that would push public opinion towards a Federal Reserve system. These
were provided by the Illuminati, including J.P. Morgan’s Knickerbocker Panic of
1907. Second, they needed a favorable U.S. president in office.
Rothschild agent Colonel House provided this by getting Woodrow Wilson
elected. -- Fritz Springmeier, Bloodlines of the Illuminati, Ambassador House, p.
273.
The engineered banking panic of 1907 did just what the Jesuits and the
Rothschilds wanted it to do. It was made to appear that the only way to avoid
another depression was to have a central bank.
To convince Congress and the public that the establishment of a banking cartel
was, somehow, a measure to protect the public, the Jekyll Island strategists laid
down the following plan of action:
1. Do not call it a cartel nor even a central bank.
2. Make it look like a government agency.
3. Establish regional branches to create the appearance of decentralization, not
dominated by Wall Street banks.
4. Begin with a conservative structure including many sound banking principles,
knowing that the provisions can be quietly altered or removed in subsequent
years.
5. Use the anger caused by recent panics and bank failures to create popular
demand for monetary reform.
6. Employ university professors to give the plan the appearance of academic
approval. – G. Edward Griffin, The Creature from Jeckyll Island, American
Opinion, pp. 438.
Under these pretenses, the American people were ready for the Federal Reserve
Bank. The name sounds very official as if it were an entity of the American
government. If people understood how the Federal Reserve Bank was going to
operate, and that it would be controlled by a few of the richest bankers, they
would not have tolerated its creation. The dream the Jesuits had of a central
bank in America took shape at Jekyll Island. The operators and controllers of this
bank are from the same groups as those who were behind the central bank in the
18th and 19th century: the Jesuits and the Rothschilds!
Only one step remained to complete the project. The Jesuits needed certain men
in the White House and the government to pass the Federal Reserve Act. By
1912, they had their man in the White House, Woodrow Wilson. Since Jacob
Schiff was already deeply into the financial scam, the Jesuits needed another
man whose expertise was politics. The man they found was Edward Mandel
House. It was he who controlled Wilson in the White House.
Col. Edward Mandel House, of the Illuminati and whose father Thomas W. House
was a Rothschild agent who got rich off the Civil War, wrote in his book Philip
Dru, Administrator... that “Cynical Europe said that the North would have it
appear that a war had been fought for human freedom, whereas it was fought for
money.” It’s an interesting concept to see appear in a book by a secret Illuminati
member.... Another man who appears to be connected to the Rothschilds was
Thomas House, who also made his fortune slipping supplies past the U.S. naval
blockade of the South. His son, Col. Edward M. House, was one of the main
Illuminati figures to control America during the early 20th century. – Fritz
Springmeier, Bloodlines of the Illuminati, Ambassador House, pp. 145, 273.
One of the most influential men behind the scenes at this time was Colonel
Edward Mandell House, personal adviser to Woodrow Wilson and, later, to F.D.R.
House had close contacts with both J.P. Morgan and the old banking families of
Europe. He had received several years of his schooling in England and, in later
years, surrounded himself with prominent members of the Fabian Society.
Furthermore, he was a man of great personal wealth, most of it acquired during
the War Between the States. His father, Thomas William House, had acted as the
confidential American agent of unknown banking interests in London. It was
commonly believed he represented the Rothschilds. – G. Edward Griffin, The
Creature from Jekyll Island, American Opinion, pp. 239, 240.
These two quotes show that Edward M. House was a key agent for the Illuminati
and the Rothschilds. Since the Illuminati is a front for the Jesuits, House was a
key Jesuit agent seeking to destroy Protestantism and to establish papal
supremacy in America.
Two more insights into the life of Edward M. House come from Dee Zahner.
In 1902, a novel was published that had been written by Edward Mandel House.
This novel, entitled Philip Dru: Administrator, called for “Socialism as dreamed of
by Karl Marx.”.... It should be remembered that the influence behind Wilson
throughout his career as president was Colonel Edward Mandel House, the
Marxist (Communist) who founded the Council of Foreign Relations, and the man
whom Wilson called his “alter ego.” – Dee Zahner, The Secret Side of History,
LTAA Communications, pp. 90, 112.
House hoped to see the teachings of Karl Marx become a living reality in
America. Remember that the teachings of Marx were the codified writings of
Adam Weishaupt, the Illuminist and Jesuit agent. According to Woodrow Wilson’s
own words, he was dominated by House while he was president! How deceitful
that the man sitting in the White House portrayed himself to the American people
as a loyal American, when in fact, he did the bidding of America’s greatest enemy
– the Jesuits of Rome! Several books reveal the control that House had over
Wilson while he was in the Oval Office.
Woodrow Wilson was the sole property of Jacob Schiff and J.P. Morgan and
other internationalist bankers, But the man who was really running things in the
White House was the mysterious ‘Col.’ Edward Mandel House during Wilson’s
term in office....
It was House and the internationalist bankers who promoted Wilson as the
Presidential candidate.... But is was House who converted Wilson to accept the
principles of the centralization of the U.S. Monetary System, It was House that
helped promote the Presidential candidacy of Franklin D. Roosevelt. -- William
Sutton, The New Age Movement and the Illuminati 666, Institute of Religious
Knowledge, p. 240.
It is widely acknowledged that Colonel House was the man who selected Wilson
as a presidential candidate and who secured his nomination. He became
Wilson’s constant companion, and the President admitted publicly that he
depended on him greatly for instruction and guidance. Many of Wilson’s
important appointive posts in government were had selected by House. He and
Wilson even went so far as to develop a private code so they could communicate
freely over the telephone. The President himself had written: “Mr. House is my
second personality. He is my independent self. His thoughts and mine are one.” –
G. Edward Griffin, The Creature from Jekyll Island, American Opinion, p. 240.
A key individual of the New York Archbishop’s control of the Democratic Party
Woodrow Wilson was the sole property of Jacob Schiff and J.P. Morgan and
other internationalist bankers. But the man who was really running things in the
White House was the mysterious ‘Col.’ Edward Mandel House during Wilson’s
term in office....
It was House and the internationalist bankers who promoted Wilson as the
Presidential candidate.... But it was House who converted Wilson to accept the
principles of the centralization of the US Monetary System. It was House that
helped promote the Presidential candidacy of Franklin D. Roosevelt. – William
Sutton, The New Age Movement and the Illuminati 666, Institute of religious
Knowledge, p. 240.
It is widely acknowledged that Colonel House was the man who selected Wilson
as a presidential candidate and who secured his nomination. He became
Wilson’s constant companion, and the President admitted publicly that he
depended on him greatly for instruction and guidance. Many of Wilson’s
important appointive posts in government were had selected by House. He and
Wilson even went so far as to develop a private code so they could communicate
freely over the telephone. The President himself had written: “Mr. House is my
second personality. He is my independent self. His thoughts and mine are one.” –
G. Edward Griffin, The Creature from Jekyll Island, American Opinion, p. 240.
A key individual of the New York Archbishop’s control of the Democratic Party
through Tammany Hall, Colonel House, known as ‘the holy monk’, was directly
involved in making Woodrow Wilson and Franklin Roosevelt presidents of the
American empire. As Wilson’s adviser and ‘alter ego’, he pressed for the passage
of Morgan’s Federal Reserve Act. – Eric John Phelps, Vatican Assassins,
Halycon, p. 447.
In their efforts to create a Jesuit empire in America, Jacob Schiff, J.P. Morgan ,
the Rockefellers, and Edward House were their agents. So many books refer to
them as Illuminists, international bankers, or as Marxists, but we have seen that
all of these organizations were being used as fronts for the Jesuits, and all of
them do the bidding of the Black Pope, the Jesuit general!
The early 1900s were very busy years indeed. The Federal Reserve Act and a
central bank, World War One, and the sinking of the Titanic were just a few of the
events transpiring at that time. Two other unfortunate events were the toppling of
Czarist Russia and the attempt to establish a League of Nations.
When the Czar of Russia, Alexander I, rejected the Jesuits’ effort to create a
League of Nations in Europe, the Jesuits wanted to destroy him and the system
of government he represented. Coupled with this, the Czar had always been the
protector of the Russian Orthodox Church, which was the Vatican’s implacable
enemy ever since 1054. Thus, the Jesuits felt that if the Czar could be eliminated
and a new government established, they would accomplish two important goals:
the Czar would be eliminated, and the Orthodox Church in Russia would be
destroyed.
The leaders of the Revolutionary forces in Russia were Leon Trotsky, Nicolai
Lenin, and Joseph Stalin. These three men were avowed Marxists and
communists. Since Marxism and Communism can be traced back to the
Illuminati and ultimately to the Jesuits through their agent, Adam Weishaupt, it
should not surprise anyone that western financiers like Jacob Schiff and the
international bankers were the ones who financed the Russian Revolution. The
revolutionaries were Jesuits of Rome, and they were financed by western
bankers, who were Jesuits of Rome.
Jacob Schiff, head of the New York based Kuhn, Loeb and Co., spent $20 million
on the revolution. Federal Reserve Director, William Boyce Thompson, gave the
Bolsheviks $1 million. In the summer of 1917, fifteen Wall Street financiers and
attorneys, led by Thompson, went to Petrograd, the center of revolutionary
activity...
After the Revolution in Russia was successful, many American businessmen who
supported it went into business with the Soviets. Averill Harriman formed a joint
shipping firm with the Soviets. The Rockefeller family became involved in the oil
business with Soviets. From the 1920’s the Rockefeller’s Chase Bank financed
business in the Soviet Union. Today the Rockefeller’s Chase Manhattan Bank
maintains a branch office at 1 Karl Marx Square in Moscow. – Dee Zahner, The
Secret Side of History, LTAA Communications, p. 93.
It was confirmed by the New York Journal American of February 3, 1949, that
Jacob Schiff gave 20 million in gold to help the final triumph of Bolshevism in
Russia. – William Sutton, The New Age Movement and the Illuminati 666,
Institute of Religious Knowledge, p.239.
Jacob Schiff was head of the New York investment firm, Kuhn, Loeb and Co. He
was one of the principal backers of the principal backers of the Bolshevik
revolution and personally financed Trotsky’s trip from New York to Russia. He
was a major contributor to Woodrow Wilson’s presidential campaign and an
advocate for passage of the Federal Reserve Act. – G. Edward Griffin, The
Creature from Jekyll Island, American Opinion, p. 210.
There are numerous other references to these facts that we could quote. These
people were American citizens, and most of them took an oath swearing
allegiance to the Constitution. Their acts in supporting a government whose
principles are diametrically opposed to the is treason. How could these people do
this? How could Woodrow Wilson and FDR support Communist Russia? They
were all Jesuits working to destroy the United States. They worked together and
supported each other because their masters in the Vatican told them to do this. A
brief chart may be of help here to see the shape of world control.
THE JESUITS
Illuminism-Weishaupt (French Revolution)
Communism-Marx (Codified Communistic Ideas)
International Bankers-Sciff (Financed it all)
The establishment of the League of Nations after World War One was very
important for the Jesuits. They had been trying to establish the League ever
since the early 1800s.
The first attempt in the 20th century to unite the whole world into a One World
Luciferian slave unit was tried in history by these super-rich conspirators at the
close of World War I. President Woodrow Wilson on January 8th, 1918 laid out a
14 point plan to Congress for lasting peace. Within this package of world peace
was neatly hidden a plan for these conspirators to get all nations of the world to
give up their sovereignty. It was labeled as ‘The League of Nations.’
There modern money changers used World War I to make tons of money and as
a toll to frighten the war-torn people of the world at that time into believing if all
the governments of the world would unite into a One World Government, this
would stop all wars between nations, and would achieve world peace and
security.
The League of Nations headquarters was in Geneva, Switzerland, and it was
during World War I that our own President Woodrow Wilson in 1918 began to
draw the United States citizens, along with the rest of the world, into accepting
this sham. Eventually, with the help of ‘Col.’ Edward Mandel House, 63 nations
joined the League, although the total membership at one time never exceeded
58. However, President Wilson was dumbfounded when he was unable to obtain
the two-thirds vote in the US Senate required for ratification of a treaty, and the
10 Nations. The Second World War was necessary to convince the people of the
world that they needed the United Nations in order to guarantee peace in the
world. The following chapter will expose the unpublicized underhanded purposes
of the Council on Foreign Relations._______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Chapter 6: The CFR: Another Jesuit Front
When Woodrow Wilson, under the direction of Jesuit agent, Edward Mandel
House, failed to convince the American people and the United States Senate that
they should join the League of Nations, the Jesuits realized that they had to
make sure this refusal never happened again. For fifty years the Jesuits had
been planning World War Two. This next war was planned to make sure that
America would join their next League of Nations. This time it would be called the
United Nations. In order to accomplish this, the Jesuits knew that they had to
have greater control of the mass media outlets, more Congressmen in their
pocket, more businesses had to be dominated, and the office of the President
had to be controlled. When these things were accomplished, the Jesuits knew
that they would have no trouble convincing a blinded and deluded American
people into eventually surrendering their sovereignty to the United Nations. In
order to accomplish these things, the Jesuits created the Council on Foreign
Relations. This was to be another front behind which they would hide while
accomplishing their subversion in America. In England they created a similar
sister organization called the Royal Institute of International Affairs.
The Council on Foreign Relations was a spin-off from the failure of the world’s
leaders at the end of World War I to embrace the League of Nations as a true
world government. It became clear to the master planners that they had been
unrealistic in their expectations for rapid acceptance. – G. Edward Griffin, The
Creature from Jekyll Island, American Opinion, p. 273.
The agents of the Jesuits created the Council on Foreign Relations. The
locations would be in the two most powerful Roman Catholic Dioceses in the
American Empire, New York and Chicago. The CFR would control the Empire’s
finance, government, industry, religion, education, and press. No one could be
elected to the Presidency of the United States without the Council’s consent, as
the office would be a tool for the Archbishop of New York subject to ‘the Vicar of
Christ’ [the pope] in Rome. (One of the founders of the CFR also aided in the
creation of the Federal Reserve Bank. He was the ‘holy monk’, a Shriner
Freemason and agent of the Jesuit General. Edward M. House.) Its purpose was
to return the world to the Pope’s Dark Ages with an economically socialist world
police state. – Eric Phelps, Vatican Assassins, Halcyon Unified Services, p. 464,
465.
And it was Edward M. House, under the watchful eye of Jacob Schiff, who was
under the watchful eye of the HEAD of this international conspiracy {the House of
Rothschild of London and Paris}, that established in 1921 what their earlier
comrades established, to overthrow the governments of France and Russia.
Called the Jacobin Clubs in France in the 18th century, this aristocratic
revolutionary movement today in America is called THE COUNCIL ON FOREIGN
RELATIONS, INC. and its offshoot is the TRILATERAL COMMISSION. The
Council on Foreign Relations, Inc. is the political side of the Illuminati today. They
have produced Congressmen, Senators and even Presidents, that they have
used Senators and even Presidents, that they have used to pass laws that have
little by little led America into becoming a Socialist country... Now when the
Conspirators saw that their One World Government couldn’t be achieved using
the name The League of Nations, Col. House, under the direction of Jacob Schiff,
formed an aristocratic secret organization called the Council on Foreign
Relations, Inc. This private Secret Society is to produce enough Congressmen,
Senators, and Statesmen, etc. so the next attempt to incorporate the US into a
One World Government will not fail, because of the voting power they hope to
have. But reader, remember, this is not a United States Government run
establishment. – William Sutton, The New Age Movement and the Illuminati 666,
The Institute of Religious Knowledge, pp. 240-242.
Phelps showed that the Jesuits created the Council on Foreign Relations.
Therefore, the Council on Foreign Relations is yet another front organization of
the Jesuit Order. The following chart shows the various Jesuit front organizations
and the people in control of them.
The Jesuits:
*The Illuminati – Adam Weishaupt
*House of Rothschild – Jacob Schiff; J.P. Morgan; Rockefellers
*Communism – Lenin; Stalin; Mao Tse Tung
*Council on Foreign Relations – Edward Mandel House; J.P. Morgan;
Rockefellers
The Council on Foreign Relations is extremely powerful and has been very
effective in carrying out the subversive goals of the Jesuits. This organization is
so secretive that most people are not aware of their existence. The Council on
Foreign Relations was instrumental in coercing America into the United Nations
after World War II. Following the war, there was a concentrated barrage of
propaganda from the news media to convince the people of America that the only
way to have peace was to join the United Nations. Today, America is a member
of this international governing body. Incidentally, instead of having the United
Nations in Europe as they did with the League of Nations, they even managed to
house the United Nations in New York City so that it would be a greater malicious
influence in this country. Also, the United Nations charter is very similar to
communist Russia’s constitution. The charter guarantees absolutely no
freedoms, although the wording sounds as if it does.
Instead of its headquarters being located in Geneva, Switzerland, this time the
conspirators place it in New York City. Who donated the money to buy the land
and the building materials to unite the nations? It was John D. Rockefeller who
sank 18.5 million as a gift to the UN, to buy 18 acres of land along the East River
in New York, where it is located today. – The World Book Encyclopedia, Volume
20, page 40.
At least FORTY-SEVEN C.F.R [Council on Foreign Relations, Inc.} members
were among the American delegates to the founding of the United Nations in San
Francisco in 1945. Members of the CFR group included Harold Stassen, John J.
McCloy, Owen Lattimore {called by the Senate Internal Security Subcommittee a
‘conscious articulate instrument of the Soviet conspiracy’}, Alger Hiss
{Communist spy}, Philip Jessup, Harry Dexter White {Communist spy}, Philip
Jessup, Harry Dexter White {Communist agent}, Nelson Rockefeller, John Foster
Dulles, John Carter Vincent {security risk}, and Dean Acheson. – Gary Allen,
None Dare Call It Conspiracy, Concord Press, p. 86.
For many years, David Rockefeller was the Chairman of the Board of this
organization. All of these men, claiming to be loyal to the American people and its
constitution, made sure that America joined this organization, whose one great
intention was to destroy the sovereignty of America and all other nations. These
men all held positions of influence and power in the American government; all of
them were considered to be seeking America’s best, when in reality, they were all
members of the CFR, an organization created by Jesuit agents with the sole
intent of destroying America. This was their first great goal and it succeeded only
too well. Consider some of their methods for subverting America.
In order to bring America into this conspiratorial body, the CFR had to maintain
the utmost secrecy. The public was not aware of the existence of the CFR.
To guard against exposure, and to mold public opinion, as far back as 1915 the
powerful men in America working in world government set out to control the news
media. They accomplished this by employing 12 leading men in the newspaper
field to find out what was necessary to control the general policy of the daily
press throughout the country. It was decided that this could be accomplished by
purchasing control of 25 of the greatest papers. Thus, while the Council on
Foreign Relations was working to remake the world, for the first 35 years of its
existence, no feature article about it appeared in the news media. It was not until
the 1960s that this near total control of the media began to be circumvented.
For decades many top officials of the United States Government have been
members of the Council on Foreign Relations. This includes many presidents,
fourteen secretaries of state, fourteen treasury secretaries, eleven defense
secretaries, and scores of other federal department heads. – Dee Zahner, The
Secret Side of History, LTAA Communications Publishers, p. 91.
Most Americans have never heard of the Council on Foreign Relations. Although
unseen and unknown, it has exerted tremendous power and control over the
decision making process in America throughout most of the 20th century. Some
of the media organizations that show up repeatedly as being run and controlled
by CFR members include NBC, CBS, New York Times, Washington Post, Des
Moines Register, Los Angeles Times, Time magazine, Newsweek, Fortune,
Business Week, U.S. News and World Report, the news services such as
Associated Press, and many of the large, influential television stations. At least,
170 journalists are controlled by the CFR. The influence of these media giants on
public opinion is phenomenal, and it is done in such a subtle way that the people
are not aware that they are being conditioned what to think. The people generally
believe that they are independent thinkers.
John Swinton, Chief of Staff for the New York Times, who was considered to be
the dean of his profession, made a most revealing statement in 1953. At a New
York Press Club dinner, Swinton declared,
There is no such thing, at this date of the world’s history, in America, as an
independent press. You know it, and I know it. There is not one of you who dares
to write your honest opinions, and if you did, you know beforehand that it would
never appear in print. I am paid weekly for keeping my honest opinion out of the
paper I am connected with. Others of you are paid similar salaries for similar
things, and any of you who would be so foolish as to write honest opinions would
be out on the streets looking for another job. If I allowed my honest opinions to
appear in one issue of my newspaper, before twenty-four hours my occupation
would be gone. The business of the journalists is to destroy the truth; to lie
outright; to pervert; to vilify; to fawn at the feet of mammon, and to sell his
country and his race for his daily bread. You know it, and I know it and what folly
is this toasting an independent press? We are the tools and vassals of rich men
behind the scenes. We are the jumping jacks; they pull the strings and we dance.
Our talents, our possibilities and our lives are all the property of other men. We
are intellectual prostitutes. – Multiple contributors, A U.S. Police Action: Operation
Vampire Killer, The American Citizens and Laumen Association, pp. 18,19.
Swinton was honest enough to admit that he and most other journalists are told
to write the things that are in harmony with the plans and purposes of the CFR.
Ultimately, the world’s wealthy; like the Rothschilds, Rockefellers, and Morgans,
who founded and run the CFR, are under the control of the black pope, the Jesuit
General. The Jesuits are using the media to prepare the world to receive the
pope as the great man of peace, to receive the pope as the ruler of the world
from Jerusalem, to accept the destruction of the U.S. Constitution, and to bring
the world back to the feudalism of the Dark Ages.
You can see that most of what we are told about the topics and situations today
are complete lies. We were emphatically told by the CFR and the Jesuit
controlled politicians that the North American Free Trade Agreement, NAFTA,
was in the best interests of the American people, Instead, NAFTA has destroyed
thousands of middle class jobs in America and moved those jobs to Mexico and
Red China. NAFTA is devastating the industrial manufacturing base in the United
States. We have seen that the Jesuits are behind the effort to destroy the middle
class in America and return to the structure that existed during the Dark Ages.
The Jesuits want to undo everything that Protestantism and freedom has done
for America, and NAFTA is part of that process
.
The Jesuit run CFR has accomplished two of its goals by coercing America in the
United Nations and gaining control of mass media. Another goal of the CFR was
to gain control over many U.S. corporations that would help in furthering ongoing
and future projects. The following are just a few of the corporations that are
controlled by the CFR and the Jesuits: Ford Motor Company, Boeing Corp.,
Pepsi-Cola, Heinz Co., Lockheed-Martin, Time-Warner, and Chevron. This very
abbreviated list of companies makes it clear that powerful forces are being
applied through the CFR to destroy America and its Constitution. Monies from
these corporations and the Federal Reserve have been used to finance the
Bolshevik Revolution, the rise of Adolf Hitler and the restoration of Germany, the
taking over of Cuba by Fidel Castro, and the taking over of China by Mao Tse
Tung, as well as the destruction of free government in Nicaragua.
President Truman sent his Secretary of State, George Marshall, to China to
pressure Chiang to form a coalition government with Mao’s Communists.
Marshall even wanted to send U.S. officers to train Communist guerrillas. This
plan was blocked by Congress. Marshall later placed an embargo on military aid
to the Nationalists. Although Congress appropriated $125 million for military aid
to Chiang, the Truman administration ran such interference that only a small
portion of it ever reached Chiang and it proved to be too little and too late.
Chiang wrote in his diary that Marshall continues to try to accommodate the
Communists in every possible way and force us to make concessions. He
doesn’t seem to care whether China survives or perishes. This indeed is a most
painful situation.’ Marshall was a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. –
Dee Zahner, The Secret Side of History, LTAA Communications Publishers, p.
125.
Why did Harry Truman and George Marshall support the Communists butchers?
Communist ideology is totally opposite to the American Republic established by
the Constitution. Harry Truman and George Marshall were sympathetic with Mao
Tse Tung because they were controlled by the same masters, the Jesuits of
Rome, working through their front organization, the CFR.
The following quote shows one more example of how the Jesuits use the CFR pro
Communist fronts operating in America to destroy free governments in other
countries.
Nicaragua was a model for Latin American countries with freedom of the press,
freedom of religion, private ownership of property, a free market economy, and
open borders. Of all the Latin American countries, Nicaragua was among the top
in human rights and living standards. Its political system was fashioned after the
United States with a constitution and an electoral system based on two parties.
Anyone over the age 18 could vote... The events that were to change Nicaragua
from a free country to a slave state began one week after the inauguration of
James Earl Carter as President of the United States in January 1977.... High
officials in the State Department who went along with Carter’s destruction of
Nicaragua were: Secretary of State and CFR member Cyrus Vance, Deputy
Secretary of state and CFR member Warren Christopher, Assistant Secretary of
State for Human Rights and CFR member Patricia Derian, and Ambassador to
Nicaragua Lawrence Pezzulo also a member of the CFR. Jimmy Carter also
became a CFR member after he left the White House.
Ignoring the murder of millions by the Communists, Communists that the CFR
had put into power, the battle cry against Somoza was ‘human rights.’ A greater
example of hypocrisy would be hard to find in the annals of history.
The Scenario against Somoza was played out as usual, beginning with a
massive smear campaign by the CFR-controlled media in the United States to
condition the American people to accept a Communist take over of Nicaragua. –
Dee Zahner, the Secret Side of History, LTAA Communications Publishers, pp.
131-133.
Using the CFR, the Jesuits placed their agents in high places in the U.S.
government to destroy the freedom loving Nicaraguan people and to place in
power the Communist-Jesuit, Daniel Ortega. It was from Nicaragua that Jesuit
agents and CFR members, Bill Clinton and George Bush Sr., made millions of
dollars through the drugs that were brought from Nicaragua to America. These
Jesuit-CFR agents in the U.S. government have been working around the world
destroying freedom loving republics and replacing them with Communistic
regimes that are in harmony with the goals of the Jesuits to restore temporal
dominion to the pope.
The final goal of the CFR front organization of the Jesuits was to place Jesuit
agents into high places in the American government. That this goal has been
accomplished is obvious.
The CFR, which was initially dominated by J.P. Morgan and later by the
Rockefellers, is the most powerful group in America today. It is even more
powerful than the federal government, because almost all of the key positions in
government are held by its members. In other words, it is the United States
government. – G. Edward Griffin, The Creature from Jekyll Island, American
Opinion, p. 283, emphasis supplied.
Thus, the CFR-Jesuits run the United States today! How can it be anything else
since we are continually bombarded by propaganda from the controlled press
and politicians? For example, they try to convince Americans to exchange their
constitutional freedoms for security, as per the USA Patriot Act? How can it be
anything else when continual attempts are made to support governments around
the world that are anti-constitutional oligarchies? How can it be anything else
when attempts are made to destroy the middle class in America?
Here are a few of the American officials who have sold their souls and America to
ruin. These are the Benedict Arnolds of the 20th and 21th century. This is not a
complete list by any means.
Presidents:
Dwight D. Eisenhower, Jimmy Carter, George Bush Sr., William Clinton, George
Bush Jr.
Congressmen:
Newt Gingrich, Richard Gephardt, John Kerry, Joseph Lieberman, Thomas Foley,
John Chafee
Supreme Court Justices:
Sandra Day, O’Conner, Ruth Ginsburg, Steven Breyer
Others:
Alan Greenspan, Hubert Humphrey, George McGovern, Henry Kissinger, Tom
Brokaw, Colin Powell, Dick Cheney
What are the ramifications of having Americans in these high positions, working
for a foreign power, who wants to destroy this nation and everything for which it
stands? They have almost accomplished the destruction of the United States.
During elections, we are given a list of candidates for which to vote. The Jesuits
make sure that all these candidates are either Jesuits of sympathizers. Actually,
the Jesuits control both major political parties in this country. In other words, no
matter who gets into office, the CFR-Jesuits will carry out their policy through
their candidates, and it makes no difference which party the candidate chooses
of which candidate is elected. This means that elections are a huge scam that is
practiced on the American people in each election! From Barry Goldwater’s book,
we read,
When a new President comes on board, there is a great turnover in personnel,
but no change in policy. Example: During the Nixon [A Republican] years Henry
Kissinger, CFR member and Nelson Rockefeller’s protégé, was in charge of
foreign policy. When Jimmy Carter [A Democrat] was elected, Kissinger was
replaced by Zbigniew Brzezinski, CFR member and David Rockefeller’s protégé.
– Barry Goldwater, With No Apologies, William Morrow & Company, p. 279.
The CFR-Jesuits have gained such control of America that their policy will be put
into effect regardless of who is in office!
The Nixon-Carter situation is a perfect example. Both men are/were CFR
members (Nixon passed away). After Watergate and Nixon back in the early 70’s,
America was fed up with corruption in government. Therefore, CFR member
Nixon was replaced by CFR member Gerald Ford, and corruption in government
continued as before. After Ford, another insider, with the title, born-again and
Bible-believing, was picked to continue the corruption, CFR member Jimmy
Carter. Always new people, but no change in policy. The CFR-Jesuits still run the
show!
The CFR-Jesuits have been doing the same thing for the past several years.
Many Americans were sickened by the Democrat, CFR, lying, immoral Bill
Clinton. Next, they put into office a Republican CFR, moral, upstanding, born again
George Bush. Both men are controlled by the same people, the Jesuits,
and are carrying out the policy of the Jesuits. What a scam! To the unsuspecting
American public, it all looks like business as usual.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Chapter 7: Vietnam: Why Did We Go?
The Tragedy of America’s horrible experience in Vietnam has left us with many
bitter memories. Many suffer terrible bouts of depression over their experiences
in Vietnam. After 40 years, many cannot hold down jobs because of the
psychological trauma they experienced. The Vietnam wall in Washington, D.C. is
a grim reminder that 58,000 Americans were killed in that totally unnecessary
war. Why did we go?
The word that caused so much hard feelings, disgust and hatred. Vietnam. Some
call it a disgrace, some a police action. When soldiers came back battered, they
were looked down upon, humiliated. The U.S. lost face in the sight of all the
world. Why bring up the subject again? Because Vietnam was actually a religious
war... Avro Manhattan, world authority on Vatican politics, has blown the cover on
the real reason our boys suffered and died in Vietnam. He traces their death to
the Vatican’s passionate desire to make Asia Roman Catholic. Vatican agents
hatched and plotted the Vietnam War. American soldiers were serving the
Vatican in their desperate struggle to survive the jungles, the hell of warfare, pain
death and destruction. It was all engineered by the whore and her Jesuits. – Avro
Manhattan, Vietnam: why did we go? Chick Publications, publisher’s forward.
The political and military origin of the war in Vietnam has been described with
millions of written and spoken words. Yet, nothing has been said about one of the
most significant forces which contributed to its promotion, namely, the role played
by religion, which in this case, means the part played by the Catholic Church,
and by her diplomatic counterpart, the Vatican.
Their active participation is not mere speculation. It is an historical fact as
concrete as the presence of the U.S., or the massive guerrilla resistance of Asian
communism. The activities of the last two have been scrutinized by thousands of
books, but the former has never been assessed, not even in a summarized form.
The Catholic Church must be considered as a main promoter in the origin,
escalation and prosecution of the Vietnamese conflict. From the very beginning
this religious motivation helped set in motion the avalanche that was to cause
endless agonies in the Asiatic and American continents.
..
The tragedy of Vietnam will go down in history as one of the most pernicious
deeds of the contemporary alliance between politics and organized religion. --
ibid. p. 13.
Avro Manhattan was a world-renowned authority on the Roman Catholic Church
and the almost total control they have of politics throughout the world. He was a
writer for the British Broadcasting Corporation. He has laid the blame for the
Vietnam War directly at the feet of the Jesuits and the papacy.
Let us look at some background information for the Vietnam War. Bo Dai, a
French puppet, controlled all of Vietnam. By the early 1940s, a strong
nationalism was developing throughout Vietnam. The Vietnamese wanted their
country back. They wanted to get rid of the French and have total independence
from all outside forces. By 1945, the freedom fighters, who were trying to drive
this French puppet out of Vietnam, controlled a large part of the country.
Unfortunately, the supposed freedom fighters were the Viet Minh, a very brutal
communist front for Chinese and Russian communism. At the end of 1945, Bo
Dai resigned, and all Vietnam managed to do was trade French control for
Communist control. The Viet Minh was a group that was headed by Ho Chi Minh.
Since Communism was a creation of the Jesuits, the Catholic Church felt right at
home with the rule of Ho Chi Minh. However, the Catholics in Vietnam were in a
minority because the religion of Buddhism held a strong majority.
As Ho Chi Minh gained control of the entire area of North Vietnam, he appointed
many Roman Catholics to key positions in his government. When World War II
finally ended, however, France tried to step back into Vietnam again, specifically
into South Vietnam. As France tried to come back into the picture after World
War II, war broke out between the Ho Chi Minh controlled North Vietnamese, and
the French controlled South Vietnamese.
By 1950, Harry Truman, United States president, declared that America would
finance the French in fighting the North Vietnamese. By 1954, nine countries met
in Geneva, Switzerland to try to resolve the conflict. They passed an agreement
stating that in two years, in 1956, general elections would be held over all of
Vietnam, and whoever was elected would control the country. Neither the United
States nor Bao Dai signed this agreement. Ho Chi Minh was very popular. If
general elections were held, Ho Chi Minh would win. In fact, Dwight Eisenhower,
United States president from 1952 to 1960, made a statement in which he said,
“If we hold elections in Vietnam, Ho Chi Minh would get 80% of the vote.” The
manipulators in the American government realized that Ho Chi Minh would take
over the country if elections were held. This would mean communist control of all
of Vietnam. It would also mean the Buddhism would remain the most powerful
religion.
The elections were never held. The agreement to hold elections that was made
in Geneva was simply ignored. Who did not want the elections to take place and
why? Why were the elections stopped?
The military and above all the Catholic lobbyists in Washington set to work,
determined to persuade the United States government to prevent the election.
Pope Pius XII gave full support to their efforts. Cardinal Spellman, the
Washington-Vatican go-between, was the principal spokesman from both. The
policy of Pope Pius XII and John Foster Dulles eventually was accepted, and
implemented, notwithstanding widespread misgivings in the U.S. and in Europe.
– Avro Manhattan, Vietnam: Why did we go? Chick Publications, p. 17.
Truman, Eisenhower, and John Foster Dulles, all members of the Jesuit
controlled CFR, pushed the policy of the papacy in spite of the fact that all
Vietnam looked upon Ho Chi Minh as an independent leader, and they wanted to
have was their own autonomous government. The Catholics wanted to be the
dominant religion in Vietnam and eventually in Southeast Asia. Thus, the
Buddhists had to be subdued. In the mid 1950s it was becoming painfully evident
who was dictating Vietnam policy from Washington. Most of the leaders who love
the Constitution and the American republic were forced out, and Jesuits were put
in place to carry out the policies of the papacy!
The fact of the matter is that the leaders in Washington such as John Foster
Dulles, the Secretary of State, and the powerful Catholic lobbyists, greatly
influenced the decision-making process of the United States.
To the Vatican, Vietnam was another exercise for the planting of Catholic
authoritarianism in an alien land against the wishes of the majority of the
population. The Vatican is a master at using political and military opportunities to
further its own religious policies, which ultimately means the expansion of the
Catholic Church, which it represents. – ibid. p. 122.
While the papacy and the Jesuit controlled CFR members in America refused to
allow free elections, they already had a simple plan ready as an alternative.
It [the Jesuit’s plan] was divided into three principal sub sections: the prevention
of the elections, the setting up of a man who could rule with an iron gist, and the
swift Catholicization of South Vietnam.
One of the first moves was the selection of a man fit for the task. This was ready
at hand. His name was Ngo Dinh Diem. Diem had been carefully groomed by the
Catholic establishment, was an ardently religious person... and a ruthless
religious and political dogmatist...
Diem was a genuine believer, considered the Catholic religion the only true
religion, and had dedicated his life to its maintenance and propagation. He was
so religious from his earliest childhood, that at one time, he wanted to become a
Catholic priest, indeed a monk. Curiously enough, he did not enter the priesthood
because the life of a priest was too soft. At fifteen he spent some time in a
monastery. He prayed two whole hours every day and attended mass regularly...
Diem had convinced himself that he had been chosen by God to fulfill a definite
task, and that a day would come when he would be ready to carry out his
mission. – ibid. pp. 55, 57
.
President Ngo Dinh Diem of South Vietnam was a practicing Catholic who ruled
South Vietnam with an iron fist. He was a genuine believer in the evil of
communism and the uniqueness of the Catholic Church. He had originally been
‘planted’ into the presidency by Cardinal Spellman and Pope Pius XII. He
transformed the presidency into a virtual Catholic dictatorship, ruthlessly crushing
his religious and political opponents. Buddhist monks committed suicide by fire,
burning themselves alive in protest against his religious persecutions. His
discriminatory persecution of non-Catholics, particularly Buddhists, caused the
disruption of the government and mass desertions in the army. – ibid. p. 56.
Manhattan has thoroughly exposed Diem and the Catholics in Vietnam. What
specifically did Diem do to create Catholic tyranny in South Vietnam?
The next year, October 26, 1956, he promulgated a new Constitution. Imitating
Mussolini, Hitler and also Ante Pavelich of Catholic Croatia... he inserted an
article, Article 98, which gave him full dictatorial powers. During the first
legislative term, the president (that is Diem) may decree a temporary suspension
of ... (there followed almost all the civil liberties of the nation) to meet the
legitimate demands of public security, etc. – ibid. p. 77.
Have we heard that recently? This mistaken idea of giving up civil liberties in
order to be secure is becoming very popular. After the destruction of New York’s
Twin Towers in 2001, and after the bombing at Oklahoma City in 1995, the cry
that was made by Bill Clinton in 1995 and by George Bush in 2001 has been this:
in order for there to be security in America, we need to give up some of our
liberties. Both presidents have passed laws and issued executive orders, Clinton
in 1995 and Bush in 2001. Clinton’s was the Omnibus Anti terrorism Bill. George
Bush’s was the USA Patriot Act, and both of them stated exactly what Diem said.
Why? Because Diem, Clinton, and Bush are being directed to do what they do by
the same power, the Jesuits of the Catholic Church.
The article [Article 98 from the previous quote.] should have expired in April,
1961, but it was maintained indefinitely. But even more dangerously ominous
was a decree that Diem had issued before that. In January, 1956, he had already
promulgated a personal presidential order, which was already portending the
shape of things to come. The Order 46, read as follows: ‘Individuals considered
dangerous to the national defense and common security may be confined by
executive order to a concentration camp. – ibid. p. 77, 79.
An obvious word was left out of that order: terrorism. That word had not yet
become popular in 1956. Today he would probably have said, “Anyone
suspected of being a terrorist and a threat to the national defense and common
security may be confined by executive order to a concentration camp?” We
could, of course, not only be talking about Diem, but also about the current
President of the United States.
Diem took the teaching of these popes literally. For instance, he firmly held,...
that it is an error to believe that: the church is not a true and perfect society. For
the Church to be perfect, the state must be integrated with her so that the two
become as one, because quoting again Pius IX ‘it is an error to believe that: the
church ought to be separated from the State and the State from the church’ a
principle, which went totally against the Constitution of the U.S., his sponsor. –
ibid. p. 82, 83.
Why was the United States agreeing with Diem, who was going directly contrary
to the principles of our Constitution? The politicians in the United States were
directly manipulating things in Vietnam. Eisenhower was telling Diem what he
must do. The Catholic Church through American officials such as Eisenhower
and Dulles was covertly manipulating things in Vietnam. The Catholic Church and
Cardinal Spellman were the real problems in Vietnam.
Elements preventing such union [union of church and state], therefore, had to be
eliminated. This meant the Protestants, at that time numbering about 50,000,
mostly Baptists and Seventh Day Adventists. Diem had planned to eliminate
them chiefly via legislation by prohibiting their missions, closing their schools,
and refusing licenses to preach, or have religious meetings. This he would have
done legally in accordance with the future concordat to be signed with the
Vatican, modeled upon that of Franco’s Spain. Such anti-Protestant legislation
would have been enforced once the war was over and a Catholic state had been
firmly established. – ibid. p. 83.
Diem’s policies brought immediate persecution.
The jails were soon bursting with prisoners. The mass arrests became so
numerous that finally it was necessary to open detention camps followed by
additional ones euphemistically called internment camps...
There followed massacres within and outside such detention sites, like those
which took place at Mocay. Thanhphu, Soctrang, Cangiuoc, Dailoc, Duyxuyen, to
mention only a few. Religious sects and racial minorities were persecuted,
arrested and whenever possible eliminated. To save themselves from arrest of
even death many detainees had to accept the religion, language and customs of
the new South Vietnam, as did the minority of Chinese and Khmer, whose
schools were closed down. Minor groups were exterminated or accepted the
Catholic Church to save their lives. –ibid. p. 81.
Are we reading what happened in Vietnam of the Dark Ages? Do we recognize
that the same power that sought to annihilate all opposition to the papacy during
the Dark Ages is in virtual control in America today? The same detention
facilities, internment camps, etc. that Diem set up in Vietnam are already in place
for when similar controls are instituted in the United States.
Blatant violations of civil liberties, of personal freedom, multiplied by the
thousands. Dissenters, of all ages and political or religious persuasion, were
hauled off to jail or to concentration camps. To better check the dissatisfied, every
peasant was compelled to carry an identification card. -- ibid. p. 88.
Diem was convinced that he had been raised up by God to force the Catholic
religion down the throats of every person in South Vietnam. And if that
succeeded in South Vietnam, Diem would then take his policies into the North
and throughout all Asia. Many opposed him, especially the Buddhists. Several
pictures in Manhattan’s book show Buddhist monks at Diem’s Palace in Saigon in
1962, and prior to that, 1956 and 1957. The Buddhists realized what was going
on, and they tried to stop it by reasoning with Diem.
They first went to Diem and tried to work with him to help him understand their
plight. That didn’t work, and arrests followed. Diem’s policies resulted in riots,
demonstrations, and severe persecution. Catholic schools were attacked. Finally,
some of the Buddhist priests decided that they would make the ultimate sacrifice.
They would get a large gathering together, and in the center of this large group
they would pour gasoline over their bodies and ignite themselves. That is called
self-immolation. Many pictures were taken of Buddhist monks and priests that
immolated themselves in protest to what Diem was doing in South Vietnam.
For people to be driven to such an extent in their protest that they would take
their own lives, shows the depths of anger and frustration these faithful Buddhist
priests were experiencing under the ruthless, Catholic puppet, Diem!
The Catholic State machinery of suppression became so overpowering and
ruthless that even the U.S. had to protest, privately and officially, the bear faced
religious character of Diem’s Catholic policy. The sel-immolation of Buddhist
monks and nuns helped to revive the religiosity of millions of Buddhists, who
became determined to resist the unjust laws of the Diem government. The
Catholic Church never expressed and sorrow or admiration for these Buddhist
martyrs. -- p. 117.
More Buddhist demonstrations followed, all in vain. Finally, an elderly Buddhist
monk, Superior Thich Quang Duc, sent a message to President Diem. The
message: enforce a policy of religious equality.” Thereupon, having calmly sat
down in a main street of Saigon, poured gasoline on himself and burned himself
to death. It was June 2, 1963. The self-immolation caused enormous reaction
within and outside South Vietnam. The world at large could not understand what
was going on, the media having knowingly or unknowingly given muddled and
contradictory reports about the true state of affairs. -- ibid. p. 113.
We see that the CFR-Jesuit controlled media was lying to Americans about the
true situation in Vietnam. They were not telling Americans that America was
funding a war in Vietnam to set up a ruthless Catholic dictator, who was trying to
impose Catholicism on the country.
In spite of all the self-immolations of Buddhist priests, Diem did not change his
policy in the least. This policy continued for several more months through
October of 1963.
It is to the credit of many Americans in the civil and military administrations, that
they expressed their horror at what they were witnessing with their own eyes.
Most of them, although confused as to the basic issues of the religious-political
conflict, nevertheless were highly shocked at the ruthlessness of the Diem
regime. At Washington, the feelings were no less deep. There were
recriminations and criticism. The South Vietnam religious persecutions were
threatening the domestic peace within the U.S. itself. Besides, the rest of the
world was beginning to take notice of the events by openly asking awkward
questions as to the real objectives of the U.S. presence in Southeast Asia. -- ibid.
p. 115.
The man in the White House, John Kennedy, who had been instrumental in
bringing Diem to power, and like Diem, a roman Catholic, began to assert his
authority. Kennedy saw the deplorable situation and realized that decisions had
to be made. If Kennedy acted against the orders of his masters, the Jesuits,
there would be definite consequences, but he went ahead and acted anyway.
Finally the U.S. issued a declaration, ‘...it appears that the government... of
Vietnam, has instituted serious repressive measures against the Vietnamese
Buddhist leaders... The U.S. deplores repressive actions of this nature.’
Not withstanding this, and the worldwide publicity, the media of America
remained strangely silent about the whole issue. When they were forced to report
the news of the religious persecutions of the Buddhists by the Catholic Diem,
either they gave them the smallest coverage, or minimized the whole issue when
not slanting the news altogether. -- ibid. p. 115.
John Kennedy was the only President in the 20th century who bucked the Jesuit
Order, and he paid the ultimate price for doing what was right. He not only
verbally chided South Vietnam and Diem, but he took definite action.
Subsidies to the Vietnam Special Forces were suspended. Secret directives were
given to various branches closely connected with the inner links between the
U.S. and the Diem regime. Finally, on October 4th, 1963, John Richardson, the
head of the CIA in Vietnam, was abruptly dismissed and recalled to Washington.
-- ibid. p. 128.
President Kennedy began a slow, but steady withdrawal of aid from Diem.
Shortly thereafter Diem and his brother were slain on November 3, 1963.
Another Catholic leader died a short time after Diem. On November 22, 1963,
John Kennedy was shot by multiple shooters in Dealey Plaza, Dallas, Texas.
Kennedy was shot by Jesuit agents because he dared to do the right thing in
Vietnam.
Memorandum for the President. Subject: report of McNamara-Taylor mission to
South Vietnam. With this report in hand, President Kennedy had what he wanted.
it contained the essence of decisions he had to make. He had to get reelected to
finished programs set in motion during his first term. He had to get Americans out
of Vietnam.... On November 22, 1963, the government of United States was
taken over by this superpower group that wanted an escalation of the warfare in
Indochina and a continuing military buildup for generations to come. -- Fletcher
Prouty, JFK, the CIA, Vietnam and the Plot to Assassinate John F. Kennedy,
Carol Publishing Group, pp. 264, 257.
As Kennedy began to pull Americans out of Vietnam, the superpower group was
greatly angered. The plotted Kennedy’s assassination, and immediately after
Kennedy died, the U.S. re-escalated the awful war in Southeast Asia. It continued
for another 10 years at enormous cost! Who was the superpower group that so
desperately wanted America to remain in Vietnam? From the evidence we have
considered, this could only be the papacy.
At 8:30 a.m., Saturday, the 23rd of November, 1963, the limousine carrying CIA
director John McCone pulled into the White House.... He was also there to
transact one piece of business prior to becoming involved in all the details
entailed in a presidential transition, and the signing of National Security
Memorandum 278, a classified document which immediately reversed John
Kennedy’s decision to withdraw from the war in Vietnam. The effect of
memorandum 278 would give the Central Intelligence Agency carte blanch to
proceed with a full-scale war in the Far East... -- Robert Morrow, First Hand
Knowledge, Shapolsky Publishers, pp. 249.
This war eventually involved over half a million Americans in a life-and-death
struggle without the Constitutional requirement of congressional approval. So
President Kennedy began pulling troops from South Vietnam. The Catholic
church strongly objected to this, and President Kennedy was gunned down. The
very next day, Memorandum 278 was signed, which reversed Kennedy’s decision
to deescalate the war in South Vietnam.
Vietnam was a Jesuit war designed to create a Catholic superpower in Southeast
Asia. The only way this could occur was by the bitter persecution of a religious
giant already in the area, the Buddhists. Ngo Dinh Diem, a tyrannical Catholic
dictator, was put into power. The Jesuit controlled American press said almost
nothing about the terrible religious persecutions taking place in Southeast Asia.
John Kennedy began pulling America out of Vietnam but was gunned down by
Jesuit assassins before he could accomplish much, and the no-win war went on
for another 10 years, ending in ignominious defeat for America. What remains is
a winding wall in Washington, D.C., listing 58,000 Americans that lost their lives
there and millions of others not listed who have lived retarded lives as a result of
wounds and afflictions received in this religious war.
Jesuit wars to destroy religious enemies continue today. Next we will look at the
Middle East and why do so many die near the city of peace, Jerusalem?_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Chapter 8: Won’t They Ever Stop Fighting?
During the last two generations, there has been continual conflict in the Middle
East. The six-day Israeli-Egyptian war of 1967, and the Yom Kippur Arab-Israeli
war of 1973 are more prominent that the others. The bombing, bloodshed, crying,
and the misery of war never seem to stop. Why do they continue fighting? What
is the purpose of continuing this senseless killing?
The land of Israel lies at the center of an area that is completely hostile to it.
Israel is of great religious and historical significance because the Messiah, Jesus
Christ, walked the land of Israel for three and a half years of public ministry.
Alberto Rivera was a Jesuit who escaped the order and revealed a tremendous
amount of information about them. He has written extensively about the Jesuits
and their operation in the Middle East. The Jesuits greatly maligned him because
of the information he provided. This information cost him dearly. He died from
poison administered by a Jesuit assassin. All of Alberto’s information has proven
to be true.
A Jesuit cardinal named Augustine Bea showed us how desperately the Roman
Catholics wanted Jerusalem at the end of the third century. Because of its
religious history and its strategic location, the Holy City was considered a
priceless treasure. A scheme had to be developed to make Jerusalem a roman
Catholic city.
The great untapped source of manpower that could do this job was the children
of Ishmael. The poor Arabs fell victim to one of the most clever plans ever
devised by the powers of darkness....
The Vatican desperately wanted Jerusalem because of its religious significance,
but was blocked by the Jews. Another problem was the true Christians in North
Africa preaching the gospel. Roman Catholicism was growing in power and
would not tolerate any opposition. Somehow the Vatican had to create a weapon
to eliminate both the Jews and the true Christian believers who refused to accept
Roman Catholicism. Looking to North Africa, they saw the multitudes of Arabs as
a source of manpower to do their dirty work....
The Vatican wanted to create a messiah for the Arabs, someone they could raise
up as a great leader, a man with charisma who they could train, and eventually
unite all the non-Catholic Arabs behind him... creating a mighty army that would
ultimately capture Jerusalem for the pope. -- Jack Chick, The Prophet, Alberto
part 6, Chick Publications, pp. 5, 18.
Here we see that the Catholic Church desperately wanted control of Jerusalem
because of its location and its great religious significance. The wanted to use the
Arabs to grind the Jews and Christians into the dust so they could take over
Jerusalem. The Vatican also invented a ‘messiah’ figure from among the Arabs
around whom the Arab world would unite.
A wealthy Arabian lady, who was a faithful follower of the pope, played a
tremendous part in this drama. She was a widow named Khadijah.... Her job was
to find a brilliant young man who could be used by the Vatican to create a new
religion and become the messiah for the children of Ishmael.
She soon found young Muhammad, and they were married.... Under orders from
the Vatican, Roman Catholic Arabs across North Africa began spreading the
story of a great one... who was about to rise up among the people and be chosen
one of their god. -- ibid. pp. 19,20.
Islam and the rise of Muhammad was an invention of the Catholic Church. The
purpose for this new religion was the destruction of Jews and the followers of
Christ in order to gain the Middle East, and especially Jerusalem for the pope.
By the time Muhammad died, the religion of Islam was exploding. The nomadic
Arab tribes were joining forces in the name of Allah and his prophet, Muhammad.
In their ‘holy book, the Koran, Jesus is regarded as only a prophet. If the pope
was His representative on earth, then he also must be a prophet of God... which
caused the followers of Muhammad to fear and respect the pope as another ‘holy
man.’ The pope moved quickly, and issued bulls granting the Arab generals
permission to invade and conquer the nations of North Africa. The Vatican helped
to finance the building of these massive Islamic armies in exchange for three
special favors:
1. Eliminate the Jews and Christian [which they call infidels].
2. Protect the Augustinian monks and Roman Catholics.
3. Conquer Jerusalem for ‘his holiness’ in the Vatican.
As time passed, the power of Islam became tremendous.... Jews and Christians
were slaughtered, and Jerusalem fell into their hands.... It was time for the payoff....
The pope asked for Jerusalem. But by now, the Arab generals felt the
exhilaration of victory everywhere they went. They felt nothing could stand in
their way. The pope’s carefully laid plans began to backfire, and then crumbled
before his eyes. -- ibid. pp. 21, 22.
The pope’s plans failed miserably. Instead of giving Jerusalem to the pope, the
Moslems built their sacred building, Dome of the Rock, in Jerusalem on the very
site of the old Jewish temple, thus making Jerusalem the second most holy
place, nest to Mecca, in the whole Islamic world. There was no way that the
victorious and powerful Arab armies would give Jerusalem to the pope. Now the
Arab leaders turned to new lands to conquer.
The Muslim general were determined to conquer the world for Allah... so they
turned their eyes towards Europe. The Islamic ambassadors approached ‘His
Holiness’ in the Vatican and asked for papal bulls to give them permission to
invade European countries. The Vatican was outraged. War was inevitable.
Temporal power and control of the world was considered the basic right of the
pope. He wouldn’t think of sharing it with what he considered heathens. The
pope raised up his armies and called them crusades to hold back the children of
Ishmael from grabbing Catholic Europe. The wars continued for centuries... and
Jerusalem slipped out of the pope’s grasp. -- ibid. p. 23, emphasis supplied.
The Arab forces wanted to take over the world for Allah.
The pope said no, and wars ensued. These wars, called crusades, went on for
centuries throughout Europe and the Middle East. The papacy wanted, not only
to keep the Arabs out of Europe, but also to wrench Jerusalem out of the hands
of the Arabs. Is it possible that the statement made by George Bush on
September 17, 2001, had any historical reference? Bush declared that America
was fighting a crusade against terrorism. Is it possible that the president realized
that one of the key objectives in this current war on terrorism is to regain
Jerusalem for the pope? In light of Bush’s track record of obedience to Rome, it
should be obvious!
U.S. News and World Report of April 8, 2002 has cover title that reads, “The
Crusades.... The Truth About the Epic clash Between Christianity and Islam.” The
article shows that Catholicism and Islam clashed in the crusades during the Dark
Ages. In this issue, when they refer to ‘Christianity’ they are referring to
Catholicism. This issue has a lengthy article that covers the crusades.
It was the fall of 1187, and an emissary from the besieged city of Jerusalem had
come to beg Saladin, the sultan of Egypt, for mercy. After barely four days of
assaults, the Christian defenders saw that Saladin had them hopelessly
outmatched. Waiting in his tent outside the city’s walls, the Muslim ruler knew
both sides had a lot riding on the outcome of this battle.
For the city’s defenders, the prospect of Saladin’s wrath loomed. The last time
Jerusalem was sacked by an invading army -- a Christian one -- its narrow
streets ran red with blood. For Saladin, his honor depended on capturing
Jerusalem. All summer his armies had battled their way north through the
Christian fiefs like an angry desert wind, with only one goal: recapturing the holy
city that had been occupied by European invaders for 88 years. -- The First Holy
War, U.S. News And World Report, April 8, 2002, p. 36, emphasis supplied.
For nearly three centuries, the Catholic armies fought the Muslim armies for
control of Jerusalem, the so-called city of peace. The Catholic armies wanted to
give it to the pope as a gift because the pope wanted to rule the world from
Jerusalem. The Arabs wanted it because the Dome of the Rock, their second
most holy shrine, was located there. War and bloodshed raged for centuries over
this piece of real estate.
Saladin doesn’t get much play in Western history books. You’re more likely to
read about Richard the Lion-Hearted, the leader of the European expedition to
retake Jerusalem -- and even he is most often remembered as a peripheral
character in robin Hood tales....
The battle between Saladin and Richard marked the high point of the Crusades,
the first major clash between Islam and Western Christendom, which lasted more
than three centuries.
From their beginnings in 1095, the crusades inspired more passion than anyone
expected. The first Crusade was preceded by droughts and famine and heralded
by meteor showers. The idea of an expedition to reclaim Jerusalem from the
unbelievers seized the imagination of people from all social classes. Led by
deeply religious knights like Godfrey of Bouillon and Tancred, armies of ‘Latin’
Christians [followers of the Catholic Church] from France, Germany, England,
and elsewhere marched through what is now Hungary to Constantinople, the
great center of Christianity in the East. -- ibid. p. 38, emphasis supplied.
The First Crusade was really the only one that the papacy won. Blood ran knee high
through the streets of Jerusalem as the Arabs were slaughtered. This,
however, would be the only victory for the papacy. Thereafter, the Muslims
dominated the fighting.
Following the First Crusade,
It took almost a century before a leader strong enough to unite the Muslim Middle
East appeared. When Saladin finally retook Jerusalem, it was Christendom’s turn
to be shocked. The archbishop of Tyre, a Christian [Catholic] stronghold north of
Jerusalem, hurried west to Italy on a black-sailed ship with news of Jerusalem’s
fall, along with letters begging for help. -- ibid. p. 39.
The letters for help brought to their aid Richard the Lion-Hearted, England’s most
temperamental sovereign.
He arrived in the Holy Land in 1911 at the age of 33.... For 16 months, Saladin
and Richard Battled across the parched plains of the Holy Land. Finally, ill and
leading an exhausted army, Richard negotiated a truce with Saladin and headed
home. He never returned. -- ibid. p. 39.
The truce permitted the crusaders to occupy a strip of land along the land along
the coast and permitted the Muslims to continue to occupy Jerusalem, but
allowed Christians to visit Jerusalem.
While the crusades of the Dark Ages failed to obtain control of Jerusalem for the
pope, the most recent wars in the last 100 years have brought the papacy closer
to her goal than she ever has been.
Marching into a Jerusalem captured from the Turks in 1917, a British general, Sir
Edmund Allenby, proudly declared:
‘today the wars of the Crusaders are completed,’ and the British press celebrated
his victory with cartoons of Richard the Lion-Hearted looking down at Jerusalem
above the caption ‘At last my dream come true.’ The colonial powers glorified the
Crusaders as their ideological forebears. -- ibid. p. 39.
During WWI, the papacy, still with a strong desire for control of Jerusalem,
planned a sequence of events that would finally allow the papacy to take over
Jerusalem. Using nations under her control, among whom was Britain, the
papacy took control of the Holy Land from the Muslim Turks. This was step 1 in
the process.
England was to take Palestine away from the Turks. This resulted in the creation
of a national homeland for the Jews with the Balfour Declaration. During World
War II, the Jesuits would not allow the trapped European Jews to emigrate to
Roosevelt’s American Empire, Churchill’s Great Britain or Stalin’s Russian
Empire. Rather, the Order permitted many to enter Palestine while the majority
perished in the Death Camps located deep in the woods of Roman Catholic,
Jesuit-controlled, Poland... By 1918, the order, financed by its Federal Reserve
Bank and Bank of England, will have completed the first phase of its Second
Thirty Years’ War -- World War I, including the Great Influenza Pandemic of 1918
having globally killed forty to one hundred million people. During that time the
Jesuit General will have used his British Intelligence Service and Lawrence of
Arabia to unite the Arabs of Palestine in driving out the Ottoman Turks. He will
have used General Allenby to drive the Turkish Moslems out of Jerusalem -- a
major accomplishment.
And how would the Company maintain control of Palestine and Jerusalem won
by its British sword? Enter the House of Rothschild with the Jewish Masonic
Zionists.
In 1918, the Jesuits would cause their Zionists in England to issue the Balfour
Declaration declaring Palestine to be the new homeland for ‘The Wandering
Jew’. Could it be that after nineteen hundred years of Rome’s crusades,
inquisitions and pogroms the Jewish Race would now have a place to call its
own? Or was Zionism a setup for the greatest betrayal the Jewish Race has ever
known.... World War I prepared the Land for the People. World War II prepared
the People for the Land. -- Eric Phelps, Vatican Assassins, Halycon Unified
Services, pp. 464, 512, 514.
Instead of taking a public stand, he [Spellman] would operate behind the scenes
by ‘personally calling on every South American country to cast their votes for
Israel.... There was little doubt that Spellman knew U.N. delegates.... After a
bitter struggle, Israel was admitted to the United Nations by a vote of thirty-seven
to twelve. The Israelis had turned to a number of men of prominence, including
John
Foster Dulles to promote their cause. Many were convinced that Spellman had
been the deciding factor. -- John Cooney, The American Pope, Times Books, pp.
186, 187.
We have seen that the Jesuits place great significance on Israel and have fought
two major wars and the papacy’s great desire to rule the world from Jerusalem,
future wars planned by the Jesuits and the Illuminati will be used as further
attempts to bring the pope to Jerusalem to rule the world from there.
Their plan is that when the terrorism and killing get bad enough, the Jesuit
controlled news media will urge upon the blinded masses the need for a peace
maker to come to that troubled area to rule. This peacemaker will be the pope.
Once he is enthroned in Jerusalem, the 1,700-year old dream of the papacy will
come true.
General Allenby declared upon entering Jerusalem that the wars of the crusades
were completed. This was near the end of World War I. General Eisenhower,
commander of the Allied forces in Europe during World War two, declared that he
was fighting a crusade in Europe. George Bush in 2001 declared that a crusade
was being fought against terrorism. In light of Albert Pike’s statement requiring
three world wars, do you suppose that each of these men recognized the
significance of these three wars on regaining Jerusalem for the pope?
Will there ever be peace in Israel? There will probably be peace for a brief
interval when the pope is enthroned there. But the pope will soon thereafter start
to exercise his authority to force the entire world to become Catholic as he did
during the Dark Ages when he controlled the world. This will bring about terrible
persecution and destruction throughout the earth. Only those who are in
submission to God’s control will find safety in that awful time._______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Chapter 9: Treason In High Places
We have clearly seen from history that the Illuminati was established by the
Jesuit Order as a front organization behind which the Jesuits could operate and
continue to conceal their actions in the eyes of humanity. We have clearly seen
that the Jesuits have created further organizations as buffer organizations (the
Council on Foreign Relations, for example) so that no one detects their existence
and role in various heinous and cruel activities.
Another such a group, but on a much smaller scale, is the exclusive fraternity at
Yale University called the Skull and Bones Society. While some understand that
is an exclusive fraternity, few realize the global implications of being part of such
an organization. This society has connections. Watch carefully.
The Taft family (which is also related to George Bush by blood) and the Harriman
family are two families that have been intimately connected to the Skull and
bones Order (which is an entry point into the Illuminati and on the surface just an
exclusive fraternity). -- Fritz Springmeier, Bloodlines of the Illuminati, Ambassador
House p. 320.
The Skull and Bones Order is the entry point into the Illuminati. The Illuminati,
which we have seen, is a front for the Jesuit Order. Anyone, who is working for or
a part of the Illuminati, is connected to the Jesuits, the greatest foe of Protestant
religious and civil liberty. To be part of the Illuminati and the Jesuits makes it
impossible to love the Constitution or to uphold its principles because those
groups exist for the destruction of the Constitution. No president or public official
in America could ever be part of these groups because it would be impossible to
uphold their oath to defend the Constitution because they are part of
organizations whose great goal is the abolishment of that great document.
Are you aware of any leaders of Presidents that have ever held office who have
been part of the Skull and bones Order of Yale University?
George Bush (father and son) was a Skull and Bonesman.... George Bush also is
a descendant of the 13th top Illuminati family -- the family that ties in with British
royalty and the Merovingians - ibid. p. 320.
George Bush, the father and George Bush, the son, have both attended Yale
University and are both a part of the Skull and Bones Order. Both of these men
are part of the Illuminati and the Jesuits. Both of these men, by their entrance
into these groups, are disqualified from being President of the United States.
than to defend the Protestant principles upon which it stands. The men have and
do occupy the highest position of trust in America and they are being told by their
handlers to slowly, but surely destroy this great land!!! America is in deep
trouble.!!!
The Bush family's connection to the Harriman's / Illuminati/Jesuits goes way
back.
Cornelius Vanderbilt Whitney married Marie Norton who later married W. Averell
Harriman (init. Into Skull & Bones in 1913), the man who helped finance Hitler to
power. The Harrimans also helped bring the Bush family from oblivion back in the
early 1920's. When Prescott Bush (George Bush's father) lost all his money in
the 1929 stock market crash, the Harrimans again came to financially help
Prescott Bush back on his feet. During the 1920's, the W. Averell Harriman,
Prescott Bush, Fritz Thyssen and Friedrich Flick created several entities to help
finance Hitler and to produce the weapons Hitler would need to fight W.W.II. --
ibid. p. 63.
The Bush family has been connected with the people of the Illuminati/Jesuits for
the last 85 years. Their influence on this family and the policies both George
Bush, father and son, have made since being in the White House have only
aided the Illuminati/Jesuits in their ongoing efforts to destroy the blood-bought
Protestant freedoms that make America great. We will even discover in the next
chapter that the Jesuits/Illuminati has used George Bush to involve America in
the awful war in Afghanistan and Iraq. How many courageous, American young
men and women have died fighting in wars that the Illuminati/Jesuits have
planned for over 100 years; we will look at this in our next chapter.
Before George Bush ever entered the White House in January of 2001, he was
already vowing his support for the work of the Catholic Church in America. He
showed that his allegiance would not be for the Constitution and the American
people, but rather for a man whose position over the last 200 plus years has
been opposed to the Protestant Constitution.
In 1960, John Kennedy went from Washington to Texas to assure Protestant
preachers that he would not obey the pope. In 2001, George Bush came from
Texas up to Washington to assure a group of Catholic Bishops that he would
obey the pope. -- Washington Times, April 16, 2001.
The President of the United States is not running the United States; a foreign
dictator, whose position pushed for the slaughtering of millions of people, who
never changes and who would love to see the destruction of this country, is
telling the President of the United States what to do and he is happy to do it!!!
That’s a stunning, shocking, and revolting statement.
The pope is the ruler of the world. All the emperors, all the kings, all the princes,
all the presidents of the world are as these altar boys of mine. -- Priest Phelan,
Western Watchman, June 27, 1912.
Emperors, kings, princes, and Presidents are as altar boys. What does an altar
boy do? An alter boy is a willing and obedient servant/slave to the priest. When
the priest tells the alter boy to do something, the altar boy carries out exactly
what the priest has told him to do. Doesn’t ask any questions, but does exactly
what he is told. According to this priest, almost 100 years ago, the Presidents of
the world are as altar boys of Rome. According to the article in the Washington
Times, the president of the United States is an altar boy.
From another document, a Catholic paper called Peter’s Voice; this was also
quoted in Reuters News service of March 22, 2001. There was a cultural center
in Washington DC dedicated to John Paul II. This is what the President declared,
“The best way to honor Pope John Paul II, truly one of the great men, is to take
his teachings seriously, to listen to his words and put his words and teachings
into action here in America.” The President of the United States, by those words,
has committed the crime for which Benedict Arnold was hung. It is called treason.
George Bush, the President of the United States, declared that we need to put
the words and teachings of the pope into action here in America, and that is
treason. From the very inception of the United States of America, the Catholic
church and the Jesuit order has wanted to destroy this nation, and has wanted to
abolish the Constitution of the United States. George Bush swore that he would
defend and protect the Constitution. By his declaration at the dedication of the
cultural center, he has now declared he wants to destroy the Constitution.
Treason worse that Benedict Arnold ever dreamed of is being practiced from the
highest office in this land!!!
George Bush is not an American. Let me share with you from the book, Fifty
Years in the Church of Rome, page 284, to show you the contrast between the
words of the Constitution and the words of the church of Rome.
The most sacred principle of the United States Constitution is the equality of
every citizen before the law. The fundamental principle of the Church of Rome is
the denial of that equality. Liberty of conscience is proclaimed by the United
States, a most sacred principle which every citizen must uphold... But liberty of
conscience is declared by all the popes and councils of Rome, a most godless,
unholy, and diabolical thing, which every good Catholic must abhor and destroy
at any cost. -- Charles Chiniquy, Fifty Years in the Church of Rome, Chick
Publications, p. 284.
So by George Bush’s statements at the dedication of the cultural Center, he
would destroy and abolish the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United
States.
The American Constitution assures the absolute independence of the civil from
the ecclesiastical or church power; but the Church of Rome declares through all
her pontiffs and councils that such independence is an impiety and revolt against
God. -- ibid. p. 284.
The American Constitution assures the separation of the church from the state,
but the Catholic Church throughout the dark ages and today has been trying to
mesh them together. The result of such a union has always been terrible
bloodshed and persecution. Because the Founding Fathers of America realized
the evils of church/state union, they made sure in the Bill of Rights that the
church and state would remain separate.
The American Constitution leaves every man free to serve God according to the
dictates of his own conscience; but the Church of Rome declares that no man
has ever had such a right, and that the pope alone can know and say what man
must believe and do. -- ibid. p. 284.
That is absolute insanity that another man believes that he has the right to tell
someone what they can believe and what they can do. That is utter blasphemy.
The Constitution of the United States denies the right in anybody to punish any
other for differing form him in religion. But the Church of Rome says that she has
the right to punish with the confiscation of their goods, or the penalty of death,
ibid p. 284.
That is laughable. As you go down through history and how one pope after
another differed from previous popes and argued and there were rival popes, two
or three at one time, disagreeing with each other, which infallible pope are we to
accept? How many beliefs of the pope and of the Church of Rome are even
found in the word of God? Is purgatory? Is worship of the Virgin Mary? Is turning
the bread in the communion service into the actual body of Christ? This is
insanity, and the Church of Rome declares that the pope can punish those who
don’t go along with him in faith. So for a human being to bow down and receive
their faith from a man who doesn’t’ know what he believes is utter insanity!!!
The United States have established schools all over their immense territories,
where they invite the people to send their children, that they may cultivate their
intelligence and become good and useful citizen. But the Church of Rome has
publicly cursed all those schools, and forbidden their children to attend them,
under pain of excommunication in this world and damnation in the next. -- ibid. p.
284.
When Charles Chiniquy wrote this in the 19th century, this was, indeed, a fact. In
the 19th-century in the American public school system, the children were taught
that the Bishop [pope] of Rome was to be shunned as evil, and as an evil system
that would attack the United States and our freedoms. The educational system in
the United States for most of the 19th-century was Protestant. But as Mr. Dewey,
and as the Rockefellers began to use their immense wealth to rewrite the
textbooks in the American public school system, the American public schools no
longer were Protestant, and so in the 20th-century Roman Catholic children in
may cases, began attending public schools.
The Constitution of the United States is based on the principle that the people
are the primary source of all civil power. (It’s a government of the people by the
people for the people). But hundreds of times, the Church of Rome has
proclaimed that this principle is impious and heretical. She says that ‘all
government must rest upon the foundation of the Catholic faith; with the pope
alone as the legitimate and infallible source and interpreter of the law. -- ibid., p.
284.
If the principles of the Church of Rome, as George Bush has declared he would
like to see happen in this country are put into practice in the United States of
America, then we are entering another dark age.
We are entering a time in earth’s history, when the blood of conscientious
Christians will flow across this land as it did throughout Europe during the Dark
Ages. George Bush’s words at the dedication of the cultural center in March of
2001 will take us to the Dark Ages again.
You say, but they’re not Catholics. How could they be part of the Jesuit Order and
they’re not even Catholics? All the more reason why the Jesuit order would use
them, because no American would suspect somebody who is not Roman
Catholic to be carrying out exactly what the Jesuits are telling them to do, would
they? All the more reason. The only Catholic president that we know about in the
20th century was John F. Kennedy and he was the only president in the 20th century
that refused to submit to the Jesuit Order and he was the one that was
killed. Every other president from Roosevelt in the early 1900s, all the way down
to today, has behaved as altar boys of the Roman Catholic church.
How about after September 11? Did George Bush stand up as a strong American
president defending the Constitution? We with he had. But we find that George
Bush’s response to the terrorist attack of September 11 was his USA Patriot Act
of 2001, which was proposed five days after the attacks, and these were George
Bush’s words. This is taken from Reuters News service. The title of the article is ‘
Bush Signs Sweeping New Laws to Combat Terrorism’. The article is by Patricia
Wilson. If somebody is saying “oh, but you got that off the Internet.” George Bush
did not sing the USA Patriot Act of 2001 in a dark corner that only the Internet
picked up. Go to the Washington Times; go to the Orlando Sentinel; go to the LA
Times; go to the New York Times; it’s in there too.
President Bush signed new anti-terror laws on Friday, aggressively expanding
the US government’s power to hold immigrants without charges, eavesdrop on
electronic communications, and crack money-laundering schemes.
“Today, we take an essential step in defeating terrorism while protecting the
constitutional rights of all Americans,” Bush said...
Crafted in response to the Sept. 11 attacks on the United States, the bill
enhances the ability of federal authorities to tap phones, share intelligence
information, track Internet usage, e-mails and cell phones and protect U.S.
borders.” -- Patricia Wilson, Reuters Internet news page, October 26, 2001.
George Bush, Skull and bones/Illuminati/Jesuit puppet endorses an act that
would gut the constitutional rights of Americans. He gives federal agencies the
right to read your e-mail before you do, to listen in on your phone calls and tap
your phone, and then has the audacity to tell Americans, “We are destroying all
your liberties, but don’t worry, we won’t bother your constitutional rights.” He
thinks we are idiots!!!!
In the same article, we read a quote from the director of the American Civil
Liberties Union, “We can not as a nation allow very legitimate public anxiety to
immunize the administration and Congress from their obligation to protect the Bill
of Rights and the fundamental values that document embodies.” The director,
Laura Murphy understood that the New Patriot Act would annihilate our basic
freedoms.
What else is George Bush capable of doing? He has sold himself and his country
to America’s greatest enemy and the total destruction of the Constitution is their
ultimate goal. George Bush and his controllers will continue to ravage our
freedoms all in the name of saving them.
An Associated Press article declared this concerning Bush’s New Patriot Act.
“Attorney General John Ashcroft freed the FBI to monitor Internet sites, libraries,
churches and political organizations, calling restrictions on domestic spying ‘a
competitive advantage for terrorists.’” “Civil liberties groups criticized the move.
But President Bush said, ‘We intend to honor our constitution and respect the
freedoms that we hold so dear.’”
The president is taking away the civil liberties that Americans have had for a long
time in the name of terrorism. With all of our freedoms gone, will that somehow
make terrorism go away? It sounds so good to be safe from terrorism, but
terrorism will not leave when all of our freedoms have disappeared. The New
Patriot Act destroys freedom. President Bush is leading this nation to ruin!!!!
In yet another Associated Press article, we read,
Attorney General John Ashcroft ordered Federal prosecutors Friday to use new
anti-terrorism powers to track down terrorists by intercepting their Internet and
telephone communications and financial trans actions...
Under the new law, prosecutors have more powers to eavesdrop on suspected
terrorists, wherever they are and whether they are communicating on the Internet
of by phone.
On Thursday, Ashcroft warned would-be terrorists that the government will be
closing watching how they act, carefully listening to what they say and secretly
reading the words they write.
“He pledged to use the new powers granted by Congress to pursue terrorist
suspects relentlessly, intercept their phone calls, read their unopened e-mail and
phone messages and throw them in jail for the smallest crimes.” -- Karen Gullo,
‘Feds Vow to Use Anti-Terror Tools’, 10-26-01.
The new patriot act of 2001 was a direct assault on the bill of Rights, the first 10
amendments to our Constitution, and it was passed by Illuminist/Jesuit led altar
boy, George Bush.
In whose name are all these things being done? Newsweek, March 10, 2003,
declared that
Faith Changed His Life and Shaped His Presidency; the President is praying on
the cover of the magazine. The American people are being told that God is
guiding the President as he destroys the Constitution and seeks to bring America
back under the umbrella control of Rome. As far as Bush’s domestic programs,
like his faith-based initiative and his views on stemcell research and abortion, all
reflect the teachings of Rome. The Newsweek magazine relates that the
President was aided in these programs by one John Dilulio who tutored him in
the philosophy of Catholic social doctrine. -- Newsweek, March 10, 2003, p. 29.
While it is clear that the President is being led by a god, it certainly is not the one
in heaven, but rather the god of Rome!!! He promised Catholic bishops that he
would obey the pope before ever reaching the White House and he is certainly
keeping his word. With the president of the United States obeying Protestant
America’s greatest enemy, the Constitution and this nation are treading on very
dangerous ground!!!
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Chapter 10: War On Terror Planned
135 Years Ago!
The basis for this entire chapter is a letter that was written August 15, 1871 by
Albert Pike to Giusseppe Mazzini quoted in the book Descent Into Slavery.
Having consolidated their financial grip on most of the European nations by the
middle of the last century, the International Bankers worked feverishly to extend
their sphere of influence to the ends of the earth in preparation for their final
assault on the United States- a nation which, through its unique Constitution,
remained free.
In the decades that followed it became apparent that, in order to achieve their
goal of world domination, they would have to instigate of the old world order in
preparation for the construction of the New World Order. This plan was outlined
in graphic detail by Albert Pike, the Sovereign Grand Commander of the Ancient
and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry and the top Illuminist in America, in a
letter to Giusseppe Mazzini dated August 15, 1871. Pike stated that the First
World War was to be fomented in order to destroy Czarist Russia- and to place
that vast land under the direct control of Illuminati agents. Russia was then to be
used as a ‘bogey man’ to further the aims of the Illuminati worldwide.
World War II was to be fomented through manipulation of the differences that
existed between the German Nationalists and the Political Zionists. This was to
result in an expansion of Russian influence and the establishment of a state of
Israel in Palestine.
The Third World War was planned to result from the differences stirred up by
Illuminati agents between the Zionists and the Arabs. The conflict was planned to
spread worldwide. The Illuminati planned to unleash the Nihilists and Atheists
and provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly
to the nations the effect of absolute atheism, origin of savagery and of the most
bloody turmoil. Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves
against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of
civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits
will from that moment be without compass [direction], anxious for an ideal, but
without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through
the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in
the public view, a manifestation which will result from the general reactionary
movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both
conquered and exterminated at the same time. -- Des Griffin, Descent Into
Slavery, Emissary Publications, pp. 38, 39.
While it is clear that the Illuminati and the International Bankers are one and the
same, we need to be very clear that both of these entities are simply front
organizations for the Jesuit Order. Again, the Illuminati was founded by Adam
Weishaupt in 1776. Weishaupt was teaching Catholic Canon Law in a Jesuit
University in the Jesuit stronghold of Germany known as Bavaria. The
fundamental principles of the Illuminati are Jesuit inspired and devised. Jesuit
General Ricci used Weishaupt to start the Illuminati so that the Jesuits could
carry out their evil deeds in the dark so that no one would detect them as the
source of evil.
The International Bankers, who funded the Illuminati, were controlled by the
Jesuits as well. Saussy’s book Rulers of Evil, pages 160, 161 makes it clear that
the Rothschilds and the Jesuits are partners in seeking the takeover of the world.
So, while Griffin mentions the Illuminati and the International Bankers as the
ones palling these wars for world takeover, it is clear that the Jesuits are
ultimately the ones seeking this dominion!!
Griffin declares that Albert Pike is the top Illuminist in America. We must
understand that as the top Illuminist, Pike is under the control of the Jesuits,
doing their bidding, and in on their most secret plans! When Pike speaks of three
wars that have been planned; he is revealing the Jesuits plan for the world. As far
back as 1871, the Jesuit Order had planned the wars of the 20th century and the
current war on terror. How we have been lied to; it wasn’t the shooting of the
Archduke of Austria that bought World War I; nor was it Adolf Hitler and Benito
Mussolini that brought World War II; nor was it weapons of mass destructions of
Saddam Hussein that brought this current war on terror. These wars have been
on the Jesuit chalkboard for over 130 years; to them and them alone is the
responsibility for these horrors. The visible leaders that are paraded before the
world are mere puppets whose strings are being pulled by their masters!!!
Pike declared that the First World War would be used to destroy Czarist Russia
and then to place that land under the control of Illuminati agents. That Czarist
Russia was destroyed in WWI is a fact of history. Czar Nicholas and his wife,
Alexandra, along with their many children, were all slain while posing for a picture
in 1917. The reasons why Czarist Russia was targeted are more skewed
elements in history. The Czars of Russia had for well over 100 years been a
thorn in the side of the Jesuits.
The Russian emperor, Alexander, was currently compelled to issue a royal
decree in 1816, by which he expelled them [the Jesuits] from St. Petersburg and
Moscow. This proving ineffectual, he issued another in 1820, excluding them
entirely from the Russian dominions. -- R.W. Thompson, The Footprints of the
Jesuits, Hunt and Eaton, pp. 245, 246.
Five years later, Alexander was poisoned to death. He wasn’t the only czar to
oppose the Jesuits.
Alexander II had progressed well with his great reforms and had attached his
signature to a Constitution to be adopted by Russia. The next day a bomb was
thrown at his carriage, which killed and wounded a number of Cossacks, who
accompanied the carriage. The Emperor in deep sympathy left the carriage to
look at the dying man, when a second bomb blew him to pieces. -- Amo
Gaebelien, Conflict of the Ages, The Exhorters, p. 85.
This same czar, who had the audacity to bring a constitution to the Russian
people, also did something else for which the Jesuits would not forgive him. At
the height of the Civil War, when the balance of the war could go either way,
Alexander II came to the aid of Abraham Lincoln.
It was a masterful move that possibly could have won the game had not an
unexpected event tipped the scale against it. Tsar Alexander II- who, incidentally had
never allowed a central bank to be established in Russia- notified Lincoln
that he stood ready to militarily align with the North.... The presence of the
Russian Navy helped the Union enforce a devastating naval blockade against the
Southern states which denied them access to critical supplies from Europe....
The fact that neither France nor England at that time wanted to risk becoming
involved in an open war with the United States and Russia led them to be
extremely cautious with overt military aid to the South. Throughout the entire
conflict, they found it expedient to remain officially neutral. Without the inhibiting
effect of the presence of the Russian fleet, the course of the war could have been
significantly different. -- G. Edward Griffin, The Creature from Jekyll Island,
American Opinion, pp. 377, 378.
By driving the Jesuits from Russia, refusing to establish a central bank, planning
a constitution, and aiding the North during the Civil War, the czars of Russia had
incurred the undying wrath of the Jesuit Order. Payback was imminent. The other
no-no of the czars was their protection of the Russian Orthodox Church, the
implacable enemy of Rome for over 1000 years.
The overthrow of the Czarist system therefore, brought with it the inevitable
overthrow of the established Orthodox Church. To the Vatican, which had waged
war against the Orthodox Church since the eleventh century, the downfall of her
millenarian rival was too good to be true. -- Avro Manhattan, The Vatican Billions,
Chick Publications, pp. 120, 121.
Not only was the czarist system in Russia to be destroyed, but the Orthodox
Church would be toppled as well. Pike revealed that Illuminati agents would then
be put into positions of power in Russia. Illuminati agents, acting as a front for the
evil deeds of the Jesuits, would bring an awful reign of terror to that great land for
several generations. Starting with Lenin, Trotsky, and Stalin, the Jesuits used
them to have millions of Russians obliterated for the next 30 odd years. Kruschev
and Breshnev continued the onslaught to a lesser degree for several more years.
All of this was done in the name of Communism, but in truth, the Jesuits used the
Communism front to carry out heinous crimes in Russia.
In order to bring America into this conflict across the Atlantic and thus violate the
famed Monroe doctrine, which stated that Europe could fight her own wars and
America would stay out of them, there was a planned ‘terrorist’ attack that caused
the loss of many Americans lives and thus, brought America into the war.
The terrorist attack that was carried out against innocent Americans was the
torpedoing of the Lusitania.
The Lusitania was built to military specifications and was registered with the
British Admiralty as an armed auxiliary cruiser. She carried passengers as a
cover to conceal her real mission, which was to bring contraband war materials
from the United States. This fact was known to Wilson and others in his
administration, but they did nothing to stop it. When the German embassy tried to
publish a warning to American passengers, the State Department intervened and
prevented newspapers from printing it. When the Lusitania left New York harbor
on her final voyage, she was virtually a floating ammunition depot.
The British knew that to draw the United States into the war would mean the
difference between defeat and victory, and anything that could accomplish that
was proper-even the coldly calculated sacrifice of one of her great ships with
Englishmen abroad. But the trick was to have Americans on board also in order
to create the proper emotional climate in the United States. As the Lusitania
moved into hostile waters, where a German U-boat was known to be operating,
first Lord of the Admiralty, Winston Churchhill, ordered her destroyer to abandon
her. This, plus the fact that she had been ordered to travel at reduced speed,
made her an easy target. After the impact of one well placed torpedo, a mighty
second explosion from within ripped her apart, and the ship that many believed
could not be sunk, gurgled to the bottom in less than eighteen minutes.
The deed had been done, and it set in motion great waves of revulsion against
the Germans. These waves eventually flooded through Washington and swept
the United States into war. -- G. Edward Griffin, The Creature From Jekyll Island,
American Opinion, pp. 260, 261, emphasis added.
Does that sound familiar? Is the author talking about WWI, or WWII at Pearl
Harbor, or about September II and the war on terror? In every case, the situation
has been nearly identical. Create a fervor of anger against a foreign power and
America goes to war and it was all planned that way!!! The Jesuits, who preplanned
the war, planned for the terrorist attacks in order to bring America into
the battle!!!
What about Pearl Harbor? Did ‘American’ leaders, who were doing the bidding of
the Jesuits, have any idea that Japan would attack? Did ‘American’ leaders do
anything to stir up the Japanese to bring on the terrorist attack at Pearl Harbor
and bring America into war? In a book written by Congressman Hamilton Fish,
we read,
President Roosevelt’s responsibility for goading the Japanese into war by
sending a war ultimatum on November 26, 1941, demanding that the Japanese
withdraw all troops from Indo-china, and China (Manchuria) is an historic fact,
although a closely-guarded secret.
FDR’s war ultimatum was deliberately withheld from Congress until after Pearl
Harbor... all agreed that the ultimatum left Japan no alternative but war...
The Japanese would have done almost anything to avoid war with America...
Prince Kenoye, the prime minister, who was very peacefully inclined, repeatedly
requested to come to Washington or Honolulu to meet with President Roosevelt.
He was willing to agree to our terms to keep out of war on a modus vivendi but
FDR refused to talk with the Japanese prime minister simply because he was
determined to get into war with Japan, and through that, with Germany. The
American ambassador in Tokyo, Joseph Grew, knew how much the Japanese
wanted to maintain peaceful relations and urged such a conference. But FDR
and his fellow ardent interventionists used ruses, dodges and tricks to involve us
in a totally unnecessary war. -- Hamilton Fish, FDR- The Other Side of the Coin,
Vantage Press, pp. 132-134.
Fish believed that Roosevelt’s deception of the American people
was an immoral and infamous act. This shrewd and astute politician covered his
tracks by shouting from the housetops and denouncing the attack on Pearl
Harbor as a day of infamy, blaming it entirely on the Japanese. While Roosevelt
was trying to bring America into war with Japan, he was telling Americans, “While
I am talking to you mothers and fathers, I give you one more assurance. I have
said this before, and I shall say it again and again: Your boys are not going to be
sent into any foreign wars.” -- ibid. p. 29.
In both cases, with WWI and WWII, Wilson and Roosevelt assured Americans
that their sons would not be going into any war, and while they were lying, they
were preparing plans to get American to fight in the war. Both of these men were
made out by the Jesuit controlled press as God fearing men who would not lie. In
both cases, America lost so many lives and their blood will be on the hands of
those lying, wicked, and heartless politicians who were following their masters
and not standing up for the rights of Americans!!!
We have watched this same scenario played out twice. In both Jesuit planned
wars America was brought into war because of a terrorist attack by some foreign
power. Then, the president in office, who was looked upon as a God-fearing man,
and who was working to bring America into the conflict, told Americans that in
order to defend freedom we must go to war. Does this sound familiar? Does
George Bush meet this same mold of am I just seeing things?
Let us notice the emerging pattern that has been played out several time in
America.
(President-God/man)
1. Woodrow Wilson
2. Franklin Roosevelt
3. George Bush
(Pre-Planned terrorist Attack)
1. The Lusitania Attack
2. Pearl Harbor
3. Sept. 11 - World Trade Center
(War Involvement)
1. World War I
2. World War II
3. War on Terror
Illuminist-Jesuit Pike declared that the second war would result in an expansion
of Russian influence and the creation of a state of Israel in Palestine. Did the
Second World War do those things? The influence of Russia world wide was
certainly seen following the Second World War. Due to the war, Russian
expansion was certainly seen as the Russian government brought under her
wings several satellite countries and even the control of East Berlin. The Second
world War also brought about the creation of Israel in Palestine. The Jews were
given the strip of land along the eastern shores of the Mediterranean Sea. Albert
Pike is batting 1.000%. Are we listening?
According to Pike, the third war would be stirred up by Illuminati agents between
the Zionists and the Arabs. Since the Illuminati is a front organization for the
Jesuits, the Jesuits created the current war on terror. What event was is that
ignited the involvement of America in this conflict? It was the tragic events of
September 11, 2001. Could it be that the World Trade Center attacks, just like the
Lusitania and Pearl Harbor, were orchestrated to bring America into this conflict?
To think anything else but this is ludicrous!! None of the newscasters have said
this. None of the newspapers have stated this. None of our ministers have said
this. The magazines haven’t declared this. Is it possible that all of these outlets
are controlled by the Jesuits and they naturally would not betray their hidden
masters?
This conflict was to originate between the Zionists and the Arabs. Who are
Zionists? They are Jews or those who are pro-Israel. In the current war on terror,
who is fighting? The Americans and the English, the two most pro-Israeli nations
on the earth, are at war against the Arabs of Afghanistan and Iraq. The conflict,
according to Pike, was planned to extend worldwide. After a time of death and
devastation, the world would become so fed up with the horrors of war that they
would welcome anything. At that moment, the 'pure doctrine of Lucifer' would be
manifest in the earth.
What is the pure doctrine of Lucifer? Lucifer is the name that originally was given
to the angel that was closest to God in heaven. After a time, Lucifer, the bearer of
light, became so proud of his powers, given to him by his Creator, that he
rebelled and tried to bring all the angels to his side. Eventually, there was war in
heaven (Revelation 12:7-9) and Lucifer, now the devil, was cast to the earth. He
devilishly sought to bring all created beings to his side. He sought the worship
that belonged to God and God alone!! For finite beings that had cast off their
allegiance to their Creator, the devil had the perfect and most ready object for
men to adore and worship. He obviously chose the most powerful thing in man's
visible universe, the sun. Through Nimrod, the great grandson of Noah, sun
worship was introduced. As generations passed, the devil's sun worshipers
began to make monuments in honor of the sun. Stonehenge in England and the
Parthenon in Rome were just a few of the memorials in the sun's honor. After
millennia, the building of St. Peter's basilica in Rome was shaped in the form of
the sundial in honor of the sun.
Towards the end of the war on terror, there would be a universal manifestation of
Lucifer's doctrine of sun worship; it will be seen in the honoring of the day that
honors the sun. It is called Sunday. Laws to worship on the day of the sun will
spread all over the earth because the devil wants everyone to worship him. Most
of the earth will choose to honor this day- the day that is steeped in devil worship.
There are so many dear, dear people who have no idea that by worshiping on
the day of the sun that they are honoring the devil's counterfeit. They have done
this in ignorance for so many years, even all of their lives, because that is what
they have been taught and seen practiced by their parents and grandparents.
Nevertheless, the sun-day worship has no basis except in the mind of the devil
for he is bent on turning all mankind away from honoring their Maker and
Redeemer and to deceive them into honoring him.
This universal manifestation will be brought out in the public view, on full display,
before all of mankind. All the world will be brought to decide to honor the doctrine
of Lucifer/the devil by honoring Sunday or to honor the one command that
reveals God as the only One who deserves worship. Throughout the Bible, it is
clear that worship of God is due Him because He is the Creator.
O come, let us worship and bow down: let us kneel before the LORD our maker.
(Psalms 95:6) Know ye that the LORD he is God: it is he that hath made us, and
not we ourselves; we are his people, and the sheep of his pasture. (Psalms
100:3)
Only one commandment reveals God as the Creator.
Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days shalt thou labour, and do all
thy work: But the seventh day is the Sabbath of the LORD thy God: in it thou
shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor
thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates: For in six
days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and
rested the seventh day: wherefore the LORD blessed the Sabbath day, and
hallowed it. (Exodus 20:8-11)
The seventh day Sabbath, that we call Saturday, reveals God as the Creator and
thus, as we honor His day of rest, we are acknowledging that He alone deserves
our worship.
As we rest on the Sabbath day, we are reminded of God's great power in the
creating of the world. As we behold God's mighty and majestic power as wrought
in creation, it cheers our hearts to know that the same Creator can speak peace,
hope, and joy to our troubled, restless, and weary hearts and minds. For the
same Creator/Redeemer is just as willing to manifest His creative power in our
own lives, to make us new creatures. So, while the Sabbath speaks of Christ's
great power in creation, it also speaks to us of His wonderful strength to restore
in us His gracious character.
As the devil brings forth his sun-day worship to all the world, the great men of the
earth who have given their lives into his hands, the world's wealthy who have
allowed their money to be their god, the famous who have coveted the homage
and worship of the masses, but who have used their talents to glorify themselves,
will array themselves under the banner of the devil and will urge the inhabitants
of the earth to follow the sunday. The media moguls who have fed us lies for so
long, who have sold their race and their nation to deception and lies, will use all
their deceptive cunning to convince the masses to honor sun-day, and will pour
foul remarks on those who choose to honor the Creator/Redeemer. The religious
leaders who have taught their followers to disregard the plain teachings of the
Bible and to resist the warnings of God's faithful people, will use their utmost
energy to turn their people away from the truth for this time. In spite of the terrific
odds against the small group of God's faithful people, they will stand unflinchingly
for the right thou the heavens fall.
May the God of Heaven help us to valiantly fight this battle that will surely come
and stand faithful to the truth no matter what the cost!!!
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Chapter 11: The Hand That Still Intervenes
It may be surprising to learn that even the Bible talks about much of the subject
matter we have covered so far. It has considerable information about the papacy,
its associates, and what the papacy will be able to accomplish in the near future
in their efforts to regain their extensive political power that they enjoyed during
the Dark Ages.
One of the problems people have with the Bible and especially the books of
Daniel and Revelation is that it uses many symbols. This is not a problem,
however, because the Bible, itself, explains what all of these symbols mean.
When you understand the symbols, you can read the Bible as clearly as if
reading plain text. In the following discussion, all the symbols used will be made
perfectly clear.
Starting with Revelation, chapter 17, and verse 1 (Usually written as Revelation
17:1) we read: “...I will show unto thee the judgment of the great whore that
sitteth upon many waters.” Here we have the first two symbols that we must
consider: the great whore and waters. The Bible uses the symbol of a woman to
represent a church. A pure woman represents God’s true church, and an impure
woman, a whore, as we just read, represents on of the many false or counterfeit
churches. Watch carefully as the Bible interprets itself. Isaiah 1:1,21 says, “The
vision of Isaiah... which he saw concerning Judah and Jerusalem... How is the
faithful city become an harlot: it was full of judgment; righteousness lodged in it;
but now murderers.” Verse two indicates that what Isaiah wrote here is a
statement from God. Jerusalem in this verse represents God’s true church, and
God said they had become a harlot because His professed people had fallen
deep into sin.
Jeremiah says the same thing. ”...Hast thou seen that which backsliding Israel
hath done? She is gone up upon every high mountain and under every green
tree, and there hath played the harlot.” (Jeremiah 3:6). Israel, God’s people, in
the days of Josiah the king, had grievously departed from God’s law and were
worshiping the gods of the heathen around them. In their backslidden condition,
Jeremiah was impressed by God to rebuke His people; in so doing, Jeremiah
said they were acting like a harlot. Here again, as in Isaiah, when God’s
professed people fallen into sin, they were referred to as a harlot.
Ezekiel says the same thing. “Son of man, cause Jerusalem to know her
abominations.... But thou didst trust in thine own beauty, and playedst the harlot
because of thy renown, and pouredst out thy fornications on every one that
passed by.” (Ezekiel 16:2,15). This was a very common thing in Israel. His
people, His church, would forsake Him, and God used one of His prophets to call
His people a harlot or a whore
.
Finally, another prophet, Hosea, was asked to do a very strange thing. As an
object lesson to illustrate the unfaithfulness of God’s people, Hosea was told to
marry Gomer, a prostitute. Hosea represented God, and Gomer represented
Israel, God’s people. Hosea was to marry Gomer to show God’s tender, loving
regard for His erring people. “...Go, take unto thee a wife of whoredoms and
children of whoredoms: for the land hath committed great whoredom, departing
from the Lord.” (Hosea 1:2).
The symbols of a whore, harlot, and prostitute represent a church that has
forsaken God’s law. Revelation 17:1 declared, “...I will shew unto thee the
judgments of the great whore that sitteth upon many waters.” This passage also
declares that this apostate church sits upon many waters. Revelation 17:15 tells
us, “...The waters which thou sawest, where the whore sitteth, are people, and
multitudes, and nations, and tongues.” Thus, this apostate church dwells in a
heavily populated area of the world, in the heavily populated areas of Europe.
Can you think of a church in apostasy that rose up in Europe?
Revelation 17:2 states “With whom the kings of the earth have committed
fornication and the inhabitants of the earth have been made drunk with the wine
of her fornication.” The kings of the earth are the leaders, the presidents, the
prime ministers, and the dictators of the world. Verse two tells us that the leaders
of the world are connected to this false church. Can you think of a church that
has for a long time connected itself to governments and leaders? This church
demands that the church and state be tied together so that she can control the
leaders. This church believes that it rules all leaders by divine right, meaning that
all rulers govern with the church’s permission. Can you think of the church that
rose up in Europe and demands control of the leaders of our world by divine
right?
Revelation 18:24 gives us more information on this whore or apostate church.
“And in her [this apostate church] was found the blood of prophets, and of the
saints, and of all that were slain upon the earth.” This apostate church is
responsible for the blood shed in our world. Knowing that and the fact that this
church controls the leaders of nations, who then is responsible for persecution,
war and terrorism? The Al Quaida, the Taliban, Osama bin Ladan, Saddam
Hussein? No. Revelation 17 and 18 says that the responsibility for war and
terrorism lies at the door of this apostate church.
We have seen that this apostate church
1. rises in the area of Europe,
2. controls the leaders of our world,
3. controls them because she believes that she is Christ’s earthly representative,
4. has persecuted God’s people and prophets,
5. is responsible for wars, terror attacks, and all manner of bloodshed.
This great whore of Revelation can only be the Roman Catholic Church. She
alone meets all the specifications of this prophecy. Since the Bible declares that
she controls the leaders of our world, and is responsible for the blood shed in our
world, then --
Who runs the White House?
Who was behind September 11?
Who is behind the war on terror?
Who controls Tony Blair?
Who controls Saddam Hussein?
Who was responsible for Vietnam?
Who controls Fidel Castro?
Who is responsible for the wars of the last 15 centuries?
Who controls the drug trade?
A book by Dr. L.A. Lehman entitled Behind the Dictators has a cover picture of
four leaders in Europe during World War II. Connected to each of them are
strings, and a man at the top is dangling their strings, because these leaders are
mere puppets. The man at the top pulling the strings in Pope Pius XII who ruled
the world from 1939-1958.
According to Revelation 17 and 18, the only correct view of Vietnam is the one
given by Avro Manhattan in his book, Vietnam: Why Did We Go? Manhattan
shows that the papacy and the Jesuits were the chief instigators of the war. Their
intention was to gain a powerful Catholic foothold in Southeast Asia, and to crush
the strong Buddhist presence in the Far East. All other reasons given for the
Vietnam war are total lies.
The many books written concerning the two World Wars are correct only as they
portray the role of the Catholic Church and the Jesuit Order in these conflicts. It
is a gross misrepresentation of the facts to claim that Adolf Hitler, Benito
Mussolini, Francisco Franco, Josef Stalin, Winston Churchhill, and Franklin
Roosevelt were the chief movers in that war. The Catholic Church controlled an
manipulated these leaders.
George Bush, Dick Cheney, Colin Powell, the Taliban, Osama bin Ladan,
Saddam Hussein, and others are paraded before our eyes as the key players in
the war on terror. We have seen that the Bible reveals a far different scenario. All
of these people are doing what they are being told to do by the Jesuits and the
papacy. The current war is a religious conflict to further the papacy’s design for
world take over, when they will rule the world from Jerusalem. This is the only
possible conclusion one can draw if we understand what the Bible tells us.
There are two other points from the chapters in Revelation we have been
considering that are very important to this discussion. Revelation 18:3 says, “For
all nations have drunk of the wine of the wrath of her fornication with her, and the
merchants or the earth are waxed rich through the abundance of her delicacies.”
In this passage, we see another powerful entity in this world that is connected to
the great whore. Revelation 18:15 adds this, “The merchants of these things,
which were made rich by her, shall stand afar off for the fear of her torment,
weeping and wailing...” Who are the merchants? They are the buyers and sellers,
merchandizing the commodities of earth. Revelation 18:11-13 lists some of the
things that they buy and sell, “...gold, and silver, and precious stones, and of
pearls, and of fine linen, and purple, and silk, and scarlet, and all thyine wood,
and all manner vessels of ivory, and all manner vessels of most precious wood,
and of brass, and iron, and marble, and cinnamon, and odours, and ointments,
and frankincense, and wine, and oil, and fine flour, and wheat, and beasts, and
sheep, and horses, and chariots, and slaves, and souls of men.”
According to Revelation 17 and 18, the wealthy of the earth are made so
because of their connection to the Jesuits and the papacy. The worldly rich have
bowed low before the god of the Vatican and have been given rich rewards in
return. We have seen several times that the granddaddy of all the world’s wealthy
families are the Rothschilds. We have also seen from Saussy’s book, Rulers of
Evil, pages 160, 161, that the Rothschild’s hold the keys to, and are the
guardians of, the Vatican’s treasures. We have also seen that the Rockefellers,
the Morgans, the Carnegies, the Fords, the Stanfords, and the Harrimans have
all become rich through their connection to the papacy. Many more names could
be added to that list. Cecil B. Rhodes and the Rhodes Scholarship, the Getty
tycoons, the Onassis family, and the Kennedys can all be traced right back to the
Vatican as the source of their millions.
How certain men and their families became rich overnight are fascinating stories.
To show how it works, think of an American family that used to own a few little
five and dime stores in Arkansas. That family has five siblings in the top ten chart
of the wealthiest people in America. The family is the Waltons of Walmart and
Sam’s Club fame. A little digging into the way Sam Walton went from small store
owner to multi-billionaire is very shocking. The man who financed Walton in his
Walmart and Sam’s Club enterprises was Jackson Stephens, a multi-billionaire.
The records reveal that Stephens owns many corporations, one of which is a
bank in Mena, Arkansas where billions of dollars of drug money were laundered.
Stephens and an Indonesian by the name of James Riady used this bank almost
exclusively for laundering the Mena-Clinton-Bush drug money that came into the
Mena Airport. This money was from the guns for drug sales that were going on
between the Reagan-Bush White House and the Sandinistas of Nicaragua.
Clinton, while governor of Arkansas, which is Rockefeller’s back yard, got
involved with the elite’s drug running. Nella and Mena Airports in south-west
Arkansas were part of the drug running system that is related to the Iran-Contra
scandal. A reporter from a small newspaper in a small Arkansas town asked why
Larry Nichols worked for the Arkansas Development Finance Authority. The
question seems innocent enough, but the answers began to uncover the whole
web of intrigue that involved the drug running and illegal arms shipments to
Central America that both Bush and Clinton were involved in. -- Fritz Springmeier,
Bloodlines of the Illuminati, Ambassador House, p. 326.
Stephens has used much of this money to finance both Republican George Bush
and Democrat bill clinton in their respective presidential campaigns. How Clinton
in their respective presidential campaigns. How could Stephens do such a thing?
Both Bush and Clinton were working as Jesuit agents. Since Stephens also is a
Jesuit agent, he could easily fund men from both parties.
Not only did Stephens use the drug money for presidential campaigns, but so
much money came into Arkansas campaigns, but so much money came into
Arkansas that the Attorney General and the then Governor Bill Clinton, along with
Stephens and his company, began putting it into business that had images of
being patriotic Americans. Walmart was one of many businesses that benefited.
Two other companies, that came into prominence during the reign of Stephens
and Clinton in Arkansas, were Hunt Trucking and Tyson Foods. Tyson Foods,
which has become known as the chicken king of America, even stooped so low
as to stuff chickens with drugs and then send them across America. One of the
board members of Walmart for years was Hillary Clinton. She also served as
Walmart's chief counsel. Walmart, Tyson Foods, and Hunt Trucking were three
companies that have become wealthy, corporate giants because of their unlawful
and evil association with Jesuit agents who are working to destroy the great
Protestant principles of America!
Revelation 17:5 tells us of another entity that is tied to the papacy and the
Jesuits. "And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY BABYLON THE
GREAT. THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH."
The word "Babylon" means confusion. The name of the great whore, the
apostate Roman Catholic Church, is called Babylon the Great because she has
brought total confusion into the world, claiming to be following Christ and the
Bible, while leading multitudes away from Jesus and the plain teachings of
Scripture. In the process of turning people from the Bible, the church claims to be
the only gateway to heaven. The Babylon here has nothing to do with the
attempted rebuilding of the ancient city of Babylon in the area of Iraq today!
This verse indicates that the Catholic Church is the Mother church, the mother of
every abominable and wicked thing that has been foisted on the world in the
name of religion. We also see that the Catholic Church has many daughters who
are harlots as well; for the verse says “BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER
OF HARLOTS.” To what could these harlot daughters be referring? To what could
these harlot daughters be referring? We have seen that the symbol of an impure
woman in Scripture represents an apostate church. (Isaiah 1:21; Jeremiah 3:6;
Ezekiel 16:15; Hosea). Plugging these passages back into Revelation 17, we can
only arrive at the conclusion that there are other churches that are following in
the papacy’s footsteps. These church can only be the ones that once broke away
from the mother church, but have since that time been gradually coming back to
her. The harlot daughters of the papacy represent the Protestant churches of
today that are no longer protesting against Rome’s abuses, but are rather finding
harmony in working with her. These apostate Protestant churches of today are
the harlot daughters of the mother-Roman Catholic Church!
Alberto Rivera is an ex-Jesuit priest who offers some very valuable insight in to
apostasy of the Protestant churches of today. He carried out many evil deeds for
the Jesuit Order. However, he responded to the leading of the Holy Spirit and left
the Jesuits and became a follower of the Lord, Jesus Christ. While some of his
understandings of Scripture were not correct, Rivera was very clear on the role of
the Jesuits and the Vatican in history. Eventually, Rivera died a martyr, having
been poisoned by the Jesuits. Rivera discussed the Jesuits’ desire to infiltrate
and takeover all Protestant churches and lead them to follow the papacy. He
stated that a sign would be given to Jesuits worldwide when every Protestant
denomination had been successfully infiltrated and overcome by the Jesuits.
The sing was to be when a President of the U.S. took his oath of office facing an
obelisk. For the first time in U.S. history, the swearing in ceremonies were moved
to the West front of the capitol, and President Ronald Reagan faced the
Washington Monument. This happened January 20, 1981. -- Jack Chick, The
Godfathers, Alberto Part Three, Chick Publications, page 26.
Some may think that Alberto does not know what he is talking about. They
probably believe that their church has not been taken over by the Jesuits.
Consider this:
1. Is your church still protesting against the tyranny of the papacy?
2. Does your church still teach that the papacy is the anti-Christ, or is it, or is it
something that your church once taught, but now shies away from because it is
not politically correct?
3. Does your church engage in celebration style church services that are more
contemporary with the times and have more upbeat music? This was part of the
papacy’s plan at Vatican II in taking over all the churches.
4. Is your church forgetting their historic teachings and becoming more modern,
casting away the old truths as relics of the past?
5. Are your church periodicals finding more and more good things to say about
the papacy, even considering the Vatican leaders to be fine Christian people?
6. Is your church willing to join the ecumenical movement, even if it means
sacrificing some basic teachings or principles that the church once believed?
If you can answer yes to one or more of these questions, or yes to all of these
questions, then Alberto Rivera is right. Are there any major religious bodies or
denominations today that don’t meet these criteria?
It is interesting that Pope John Paul II agrees with Alberto Rivera. John Paul
made a statement in which he declared a major concern of the Vatican. He is
concerned about new religious groups that are arising in America that are
warning the world about the plans of the papacy to takeover the world. These
new groups are telling the world that the papacy is still the anti-christ, and,
according to John Paul II, these groups are seriously affecting the plans of the
papacy.
The proselytizing activity of the sects and new religious groups of America is a
grave hindrance to the work of evangelization.... [what he means is that there are
independent religious groups that are hindering the papacy’s drive to take over
the world.] The success of proselytism by the sects and new religious groups in
American cannot be ignored. It demands of the Church on the continent a
thorough study, to be carried out in each nation and at the international level....
For the response to the challenge of the sects to be effective, there is a need for
an appropriate coordination of initiatives among dioceses, aimed at bringing
about a more effective through shared projects which will produce better results.
-- Pope John Paul II, The Challenge of the Sects, Exhortation, Article 73.
John Paul did not express concern about denominations that have been around
for a century or two. Why? The answer is obvious; those denominations are of no
concern to John Paul because they have been infiltrated and taken over by the
Jesuits. Those churches have stopped protesting about the evils of the papacy!
John Paul is concerned about groups that have arisen in the last few decades,
who, in response to the suppression of truth in their mainline churches, have
been forced to preach the truth outside of these churches.
According to Revelation 17:5, the Catholic Church has many harlot daughters.
According to Alberto Rivera and John Paul II, those harlot daughters include
every Protestant denomination today that has forsaken their message, which is
their sole purpose for existence! When a denomination refuses to give the
straight Biblical truth, that denomination is committing spiritual adultery before
God, and is considered to be an harlot.
Revelation 17 supports every principle outlined in this book. It reveals the control
of the papacy’s Jesuits over the leaders of our world, over the wealthy of the
earth, and over the churches today. May God help us to walk humbly before Him,
trusting in His grace, that we may rightly represent Him._______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Chapter 12: Divine Hand Over The United States Removed
The change of the Sabbath is a sign or mark of the authority of the Romish
Church. Those who, understanding the claims of the forth commandment,
choose to observe the false Sabbath in the place of the true, are thereby paying
homage to that power by which alone it is commanded. The mark of the beast is
the papal Sabbath, which has been accepted by the world in the place of the day
of God’s appointment.
There are true Christians in every church, not excepting the Roman Catholic
communion. None are condemned until they have had the light and have seen
the obligation of the fourth commandment. But when the decree shall go forth
enforcing the counterfeit Sabbath, and the loud cry of “the third angel” shall warn
men against the worship of the beast and his image, the line will be clearly drawn
between the false and the true. Then those who still continue in transgression will
receive the mark of the beast.
With rapid steps we are approaching this period. When Protestant churches shall
unite with the secular power in sustaining a false religion, for opposing which
their ancestors endured the fiercest persecution, then will the papal Sabbath be
enforced by the combined authority of church and State. There will be a national
apostasy [Apostasy is defined as the abandonment of biblical Truths], which will
end in national ruin.
Marvelous in her shrewdness and cunning is the Roman catholic Church. She
presents a fair front to the world, covering with apologies her record of horrible
cruelties, and declaring that her spirit of persecution no longer exists. But she is
the same as in the days of the Reformation, when men of God stood up at the
peril of their lives to expose her iniquity; the same as when she assumed the
power to control kings and princes, and claimed the prerogatives of God. She
may clothe herself in Christlike garments, the better to carry forward her
purposes; but she still retains the venom of the serpent, and her principles are
exerting their influence in legislative halls, in churches, and in the hearts of men.
Her spirit is no less cruel and despotic now than when it crushed out human
liberty, and slew the saints of the Most High.
When the State [the United States] shall enforce the decrees and sustain the
institutions of the church, then will Protestant America have formed an image of
the Papacy. Then the true church will be assailed by persecution as were God’s
people in ancient times. Almost every century furnishes instances of what human
hearts, controlled by rage and malice, can do under a plea of serving God by
protecting the right of the church and State. The Protestant churches that have
followed in the steps of Rome by forming alliances with worldly powers have
manifested a similar desire to restrict liberty of conscience. How many nonconformist
ministers have suffered under the power of the Church of England!
Persecution always follows a restriction of religious liberty on the part of secular
governments. (1)
God has a law which... is designed to govern the inhabitants of this world. Christ
died that the human family might be brought back to their allegiance to God. He
was their only hope of redemption. He did not suffer and die on Calvary’s cross to
annul the law, because he would thus be the administrator of sin by perpetuating
transgression. If the law of God could have been changed, or one precept of it
altered to meet man’s fallen condition, then the Son of God need not have come
into our world and died. But because the law of God was changeless in its
character; because not one principle of it , not even a jot or a tittle(dotting I’s or
crossing T’s), could be dishonored and swept away, God consented to let his Son
take upon himself the results of man’s transgression of that law, thus making it
possible for man to be pardoned, and to become obedient to all God’s
commandments. It is the righteousness and perfection of his Son, who takes
upon himself our sins, our defect, our weaknesses, which God accepts; and
through faith in the merits of the blood of a crucified and risen Saviour we are
prisoners of hope. Christ’s righteousness becomes our righteousness, if we
sustain a living connection with him. Then we cease to transgress the holy law of
God, and become partakers of the divine nature.
A time is coming when the law of God is, in a special sense, to be made void in
our land. The rulers of our nation will, by legislative enactments, enforce the
Sunday law, and thus God’s people be brought into great peril. When our nation,
in its legislative councils, shall enact laws to bind the consciences of men in
regard to their religious privileges, enforcing Sunday observance, and bringing
oppressive power to bear against those who keep the seventh-day Sabbath
[Saturday], the law of God will, to all intents and purposes, be made void in our
land; and national apostasy will be followed by national ruin. (2)
The time has come when judgment is fallen in the streets, and equity cannot
enter, and he that departeth from evil maketh himself a prey.... The people of the
United States have been a favored people; but when they restrict religious liberty,
surrender Protestantism, and give countenance to popery, the measure of their
guilt will be full, and "national apostasy" will be registered in the books of heaven.
The result of this apostasy will be national ruin. (3)
But the time to receive the mark of the beast, as designated in prophecy, has not
yet come. The testing time has not yet come. There are true Christians in every
church, not excepting the Roman Catholic communion. None are condemned
until they have had the light and have seen the obligation of the fourth
commandment. But when the decree shall go forth enforcing the counterfeit
Sabbath, and when the loud cry of the third angel shall warn men against the
worship of the beast and his image, the line will be clearly drawn between the
false and the true. Then those who still continue in transgression will receive the
mark of the beast in their foreheads or in their hands.
With rapid steps we are approaching this period. When Protestant churches shall
unite with the secular power to sustain a false religion, for opposing which their
ancestors endured the fiercest persecution, then will the papal Sabbath be
enforced by the combined authority of church and state. There will be a national
apostasy, which will end only in national ruin. (4)
We are now making our choice, and we shall soon discern between him that
serveth God and him that serveth him not. Read the fourth chapter of Malachi,
and think about it seriously. The day of God is right upon us. The world has
converted the church. Both are in harmony, and are acting upon a short-sighted
policy. Protestants will work upon the rulers of the land to make laws to restore
the lost ascendency of the man of sin, who sits in the temple of God, showing
himself that he is God. The Roman Catholic principles will be taken under the
care and protection of the State. This national apostasy will speedily be followed
by national ruin. The protest of Bible truth will be no longer tolerated by those
who have made not the law of God their rule of life. Then will the voice be heard
from the graves of martyrs, represented by the souls which John saw slain for the
word of God and the testimony of Jesus Christ which they held; then the prayer
will ascend from every true child of God, "It is time, Lord, for thee to work: for
they have made void thy law." (5)
Men are prone to abuse the long suffering of God, and to presume on his
forbearance. But there is a point in human iniquity when it is time for God to
interfere; and terrible are the issues. "The Lord is slow to anger, and great in
power, and will not at all acquit the wicked. [Nahum 1:3]" The long-suffering of
God is wonderful, because he puts constraint on his own attributes; but
punishment is none the less certain. Every century of profligacy has treasured up
wrath against the day of wrath; and when the time comes, and the iniquity is full,
then God will do his strange work. It will be found a terrible thing to have worn out
the divine patience; for the wrath of God will fall so signally and strongly that it is
represented as being unmixed with mercy; the very earth will be desolated. It is
at the time of the national apostasy, when, acting on the policy of Satan, the
rulers of the land will rank themselves on the side of the man of sin [the pope] -- it
is then the measure of guilt is full; the national apostasy is the signal for national
ruin. (6)
Already the doctrine that men are released from obedience to God's
requirements has weakened the force of moral obligation, and opened the floodgates
of iniquity upon the world. Lawlessness, dissipation, and corruption are
sweeping in upon us like an overwhelming tide. In the family, Satan is at work.
His banner waves, even in professedly Christian households. There is envy, evil
surmising, hypocrisy; estrangement, emulation, strife, betrayal of sacred trusts,
indulgence of lust. The whole system of religious principles and doctrines, which
should form the foundation and framework of social life, seems to be a tottering
mass, ready to fall to ruin. The vilest of criminals, when thrown into prison for
their offenses, are often made the recipients of gifts and attentions, as if they had
attained an enviable distinction. The greatest publicity is given to their character
and crimes. The papers publish the revolting details of vice, thus initiating others
into the practice of fraud, robbery, and murder; and Satan exults in the success
of his hellish schemes. The infatuation of vice, the wanton taking of life, the
terrible increase of intemperance and iniquity of every order and degree, should
arouse all who fear God to inquire what can be done to stay the tide of evil. {ST,
July 4, 1899 par. 9}
Courts of justice are corrupt. Rulers are actuated by desire for gain, and love of
sensual pleasure. Intemperance has beclouded the faculties of many, so that
Satan has almost complete control of them. Jurists are perverted, bribed,
deluded. Drunkenness and revelry, passion envy, dishonesty of every sort, are
represented among those who administer the laws. "Justice standeth afar off; for
truth is fallen in the street, and equity cannot enter.[Isaiah 59:14]" {ST, July 4,
1899 par. 10}
Our land is in jeopardy. The time is drawing on when its legislators shall so abjure
the principles of Protestantism as to give countenance to Romish [Catholic]
apostasy. The people for whom God has so marvelously wrought, strengthening
them to throw off the galling yoke of popery, will, by a national act, give vigor to
the corrupt faith of Rome, and thus arouse the tyranny which only waits for a
touch to start again into cruelty and despotism. With rapid steps are we already
approaching this period. When Protestant churches shall seek the support of the
secular power, thus following the example of that apostate church, for opposing
which their ancestors endured the fiercest persecution, then will there be a
national apostasy which will end only in national ruin. (7)
With rapid steps we are approaching this period. When Protestant churches shall
unite with the secular power to sustain a false religion, for opposing which their
ancestors endured the fiercest persecution, then will the papal Sabbath [Sunday]
be enforced by the combined authority of church and state. There will be a
national apostasy, which will end only in national ruin. (8)
1. E.G. White, The Signs of the Times, Pacific Press, {ST, November 8, 1899 par.
6}
2. E.G. White, Advent Review and Sabbath Herald, Review & Herald, {RH,
December 18, 1888 par. 5}
3. E.G. White, Advent Review and Sabbath Herald, Review & Herald, {RH, May
2, 1893 par. 11}
4. E.G. White, Bible Training School, Review & Herald, {BTS, February 1, 1913
par. 6}
5. E.G. White, The General Conference Bulletin, Review & Herald, {GCB,
January 1, 1900 par. 10}
6. E.G. White, General Conference Daily Bulletin, Review & Herald, {GCDB, April
13, 1891 par. 21}
7. E.G. White, The Signs of the Times, Pacific Press, {ST, July 4, 1899 par. 11}
8. E.G. White, Manuscript 51, 1899. {Ev 235.1}
If you would like more information on the Bible and especially the book of
Revelation, please write to:
Truth Triumphant
P.O. Box 1417
Eustis, Florida 32727
AN ENEMY HAS BEEN STALKING AMERICA FOR OVER 200 YEARS
She is about to apply the death grip from which America will never recover. The
book in your hand tells who the enemy is, who they have used in history, who is
aiding them today, and how the final scenes will unfold.